Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wjfd9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:31:08.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Device closure of atrial septal defect: medium-term outcome with special reference to complications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2011

Masood Sadiq ,
Tehmina Kazmi ,
Asif U. Rehman ,
Farhan Latif ,
Najam Hyder  and
Shakeel A. Qureshi
Masood Sadiq*
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, The Children's Hospital, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan
Tehmina Kazmi
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, The Children's Hospital, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan
Asif U. Rehman
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Ghaus-ul-Azam Road, Lahore, Pakistan
Farhan Latif
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, Punjab Institute of Cardiology, Ghaus-ul-Azam Road, Lahore, Pakistan
Najam Hyder
Affiliation:
Department of Paediatric Cardiology, The Children's Hospital, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan
Shakeel A. Qureshi
Affiliation:
Department of Congenital Heart Disease, Evelina Children's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence to: Professor Dr Masood Sadiq, FRCPCH, FRCP(Ed), Head Department of Paediatric Cardiology, The Children's Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Ferozepur Road, Lahore, Pakistan. Tel: 0092-42-99231723; Fax: 0092-42-99230358; E-mail: drmasoodsadiq@hotmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

There are concerns over the outcome of device closure of secundum atrial septal defect with special reference to erosions and aortic regurgitation.

Aim

To assess the medium-term outcome of device closure of atrial septal defects with special reference to complications.

Methods

A total of 205 patients with secundum atrial septal defects underwent transcatheter closure from October, 1999 to April, 2009. The median age was 18 (1.4–55) years. Amplatzer Septal Occluder was used in all the patients. Medium-term follow-up was available in 176 of 200 (88%) patients.

Results

Device closure was successful in 200 out of 205 (98%) patients. The device embolised in four patients and was associated with short inferior caval vein margin (p = 0.003). Balloon sizing in 71 patients (35%) resulted in implantation of a larger device (p = 0.002). Early complications included pericardial effusion, 2:1 heart block, and infective endocarditis (1 patient each). There were eight patients who reported migraine (3.9%). At median follow-up of 5.8 (0.6–10.3) years, complete closure occurred in 197 out of 200 patients. Short superior caval vein margin was associated with a residual shunt (p < 0.001). There were two patients who developed mild aortic regurgitation (1%), which correlated with a device-to-defect ratio of >1.3:1 (p = 0.001). There were no erosions, late embolisation, or thromboembolism. Atrial fibrillation occurred in three adults (1.5%).

Conclusions

Device closure of secundum atrial septal defects using Amplatzer Septal Occluder is safe and effective in the medium term. Short inferior caval vein margin correlates with increased risk of embolisation and short superior caval vein margin with a residual shunt. The risk of developing aortic regurgitation is low and correlates with increased device-to-defect ratio.

Keywords

Congenital heart diseaseinterventionsfollow-upatrial septal defect

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Cardiology in the Young , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 71 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Vogel, M, Berger, F, Dahnert, I, Ewert, P, Lange, PE. Treatment of atrial septal defects in symptomatic children aged less than 2 years of age using the Amplatzer septal occluder. Cardiol Young 2000; 10: 534–537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Masura, J, Gavora, P, Formanek, A, et al. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects using the new self-centring Amplatzer septal occluder: initial human experience. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 42: 388–393.3.0.CO;2-7>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Wilkinson, JL, Goh, TH. Early clinical experience with use of the “Amplatzer septal occluder” device for atrial septal defect. Cardiol Young 1998; 8: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Chan, KC, Godman, MJ, Walsh, K, Wilson, N, Redington, A, Gibbs, JL. Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and interatrial communications with a new self expanding Nitinol double disc device (Amplatzer septal occluder): multicentre UK experience. Heart 1999; 82: 300–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Hijazi, ZM, Cao, Q, Patel, H, Rhodes, J. Transcatheter closure of atrial communications using the Amplatzer septal occluder. J Interv Cardiol 1999; 12: 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Berger, F, Ewert, P, Bjorn tad, PG, et al. Transcatheter closure as standard treatment for most interatrial defects: experience in 200 patients treated with the Amplatzer septal occluder. Cardiol Young 1999; 9: 468–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chessa, M, Carminati, M, Butera, G, et al. Early and late complications associated with transcatheter occlusion of secundum atrial septal defect. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1061–1065.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Knepp, MD, Rocchini, AP, Lloyd, TR, Aiyagari, RM. Long-term follow up of secundum atrial septal defect closure with the Amplatzer septal occluder. Congenital Heart Disease 2010; 5: 32–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Spence, MS, Qureshi, SA. Complications of transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects. Heart 2005; 9: 1512–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Amin, Z, Hijazi, ZM, Bass, JL, Cheatham, JP, Hillenbrand, WE, Kleinmann, CS. Erosion of Amplatzer septal occluder device after closure of secundum atrial septal defects: review of registry of complications and recommendations to minimize future risk. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 496–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Schoen, SP, Boscheri, A, Lange, SA, et al. Incidence of aortic valve regurgitation and outcome after percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects and patent foramen ovale. Heart 2008; 94: 844–847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Sadiq, M, Akram, Z, Butt, M. Transcatheter occlusion of Secundum atrial septal defects with Amplatzer Septal Occluder – initial experience. Pakistan J Cardiol 2001; 12: 61–66.Google Scholar
13. Pondar, T, Martanovic, P, Gavora, P, Masura, J. Morphological variations of secundum-type atrial septal defects: feasibility for percutaneous closure using Amplatzer septal occluder. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 386–391.Google Scholar
14. Shrivastava, S, Radhakrishnan, S. Echocardiographic anatomy of the atrial septal defects: “nomenclature of rims”. Ind Heart J 2003; 55: 88–89.Google Scholar
15. Dalvi, B. Balloon assisted technique for closure of large atrial septal defects. Images Paediatr Cardiol 2008; 37: 5–9.Google Scholar
16. Divekar, A, Gaamangwe, T, Shaikh, N, Raabe, M, Ducas, J. Cardiac perforation after device closure of atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer septal occluder. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 1213–1218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Fischer, G, Stieh, J, Uebing, A, Hoffmann, U, Morf, G, Kramer, H. Experience with transcatheter closure of Secundum atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer septal occluder: a single centre study in 236 consecutive patients. Heart 2003; 89: 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Raghuram, RA Krishnan, R, Kumar, S, Balamurugan, K. Complications in atrial septal defect device closure. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 496–502.Google Scholar
19. Rao, PS, Berger, F, Rey, C, et al. International Buttoned Device Trial Group. Results of transvenous occlusion of secundum atrial septal defects with the fourth generation buttoned device: comparison with first, second and third generation devices. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 36: 583–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Worms, AM, Rey, C, Bourlon, F, et al. Experience francaise de la fermeture des communications interauruculaires de type ostium secundum par la prothese boutonnee de Sideris. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 1996; 89: 509–515.Google Scholar
21. Krumsdorf, U, Ostermayer, S, Billinger, K, et al. Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 302–305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Scholtz, W, Jategaonkar, S, Faber, L. Unusual complication with transcatheter closure of an atrial septal defect prevented by adequate imaging. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Circulation 2008; 117: 181–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23. Shaheen, J, Alper, L, Rosenmann, D, et al. Effect of surgical repair of secundum-type atrial septal defect on right atrial, right ventricular, and left ventricular volumes in adults. Am J Cardiol 2000; 86: 1395–1397.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24. Gomez, C, Ludomirsky, A, Ensing, G, Rocchini, A. Effect of acute changes in load on left ventricular diastolic function during device closure of atrial septal defects. Am J Cardiol 2009; 95: 686–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Schubert, S, Peters, B, Abdul-Khaliq, H, Nagdyman, N, Lange, PE, Ewert, P. Left ventricular conditioning in the elderly patient to prevent congestive heart failure after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 64: 333–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Gatzoulis, MA, Freeman, MA, Siu, SC, Webb, GD, Harris, L. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. NEJM 1999; 340: 839–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27. Ghosh, S, Chatterjee, S, Black, E, Firmin, RK. Surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults: effect of age at operation on outcome. Heart 2002; 88: 485–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
28. Jategaonkar, S, Scholtz, W, Schmidt, H, Horstkotte, D. Percutaneous closure of atrial septal defects: echocardiographic and functional results in elderly patients over 60 years. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Nehgme, RA, Huddleston, AR, Cheatham, JP. Progression to late complete atrioventricular block following Amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defect in a child. Pediatr Cardiol 2009; 30: 367–370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30. Massin, MM, Dessy, H, Malekzadeh-Milani, SG, Khaldi, K, Topac, B, Edelman, R. Chronotropic impairment after surgical or percutaneous closure of atrial septal defect. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 73: 564–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31. Suda, K, Raboisson, MJ, Piette, E, Dahdah, NS, Miró, J. Reversible atrioventricular block associated with closure of atrial septal defects using the Amplatzer device. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1677–1682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed