Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T22:04:37.947Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Product of Ideals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

David F. Anderson  and
David E. Dobbs
David F. Anderson
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A
David E. Dobbs
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Tennessee Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, U.S.A
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article introduces the concept of a condensed domain, that is, an integral domain R for which IJ = {ij: i ∊ I, j ∊ J} for all ideals I and J of R. This concept is used to characterize Bézout domains (resp., principal ideal domains; resp., valuation domains) in suitably larger classes of integral domains. The main technical results state that a condensed domain has trivial Picard group and, if quasilocal, has depth at most 1. Special attention is paid to the Noetherian case and related examples.

Keywords

13F0513A1513CT513E0513G05

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , 01 March 1983 , pp. 106 - 114
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1983

References

1. Bourbaki, N., Commutative algebra, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1972.Google Scholar
2. Gilmer, R., Multiplicative ideal theory, Dekker, New York, 1972.Google Scholar
3. Kaplansky, I., Commutative rings, rev. edition, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1974.Google Scholar
4. Nagata, M., Local rings, Interscience, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
5. Papick, I.J., Topologically defined classes of going down domains, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 219 (1976), 1-37.Google Scholar
6. Vasconcelos, W.V., Divisor theory in module categories, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1974.Google Scholar
7. Zafrullah, M., On pre-Schreier domains, preprint.Google Scholar