Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-27T03:53:17.679Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standardized Screening and Assessment of Older Emergency Department Patients: A Survey of Implementation in Quebec*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 March 2010

Jane McCusker ,
Josée Verdon ,
Nathalie Veillette ,
Katherine Berg ,
Tina Emond  and
Eric Belzile
Jane McCusker*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital Centre Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University
Josée Verdon
Affiliation:
McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital Division of Geriatrics, McGill University
Nathalie Veillette
Affiliation:
Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, Université de Montréal
Katherine Berg
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto
Tina Emond
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital Centre
Eric Belzile
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St. Mary's Hospital Centre
*
Requests for offprints should be sent to: / Les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: Jane McCusker, M.D., Dr.P.H., St. Mary's Hospital Centre, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, 3830 Lacombe Avenue Montreal, QC H3T 1M5. (jane.mccusker@mcgill.ca)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cost-effective methods have been developed to help busy emergency department (ED) staff cope with the growing number of older patients, including quick screening and assessment tools to identify those at high risk and note their specific needs. This survey, from a sample of key informants from all EDs (n=111) in the province of Quebec (participation rate of 88.2%), investigated the implementation of these tools and barriers to implementation. Questionnaires (administered either by telephone or by self-completion) included characteristics of the ED, characteristics of the respondent, use of tools, and method of implementation. Barriers to the implementation of these tools included lack of resources for screening and follow-up, misunderstandings of the difference between screening and assessment tools, and need for adaptation of the tools to the local context. Education of staff and pre-implementation adaptation and testing are needed for successful implementation.

Résumé

Des méthodes efficientes ont été développées pour aider le personnel des départements d'urgence (DU) à s'ajuster au nombre croissant de patients âgés, leur procurant des outils de dépistage et d'évaluation permettant d'identifier les patients plus à risque ainsi que les besoins spécifiques à ceux-ci. Ce sondage des informateurs-clé de tous les départements d'urgence (n=111) de la province de Québec porte sur l'implantation de ces outils ainsi que sur les barrières à leur implantation. Les questionnaires (complétés soit par téléphone ou auto-administrés) incluaient : les caractéristiques du département d'urgence (DU), les caractéristiques des répondants, l'utilisation d'outils ainsi que le mode d'implantation. Les barrières à l'implantation de ces outils sont : le manque de ressources pour dépister et faire le suivi, la méconnaissance de la différence entre outils de dépistage et d'évaluation et enfin, la nécessité d'adapter les outils aux contextes locaux. La formation des intervenants et des essais préalables sont nécessaires à l'implantation fructueuse.

Keywords

agingscreeningemergency departmentimplementationsurveyvieillissementdépistageservice des urgencesmise en oeuvresondage
Type
Articles
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 26 , Issue 1 , Spring/Printemps 2007 , pp. 49 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

The authors are grateful to Dr. Alain Vadeboncoeur and Sylvie Berger of the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services, for making the working documents on the ED classification available to us. We also appreciate the assistance provided by Karine St-Denis in the data collection. This study was funded by a grant from the Inter-University Group on Emergency Research (Groupe interuniversitaire de recherche sur les urgences—GIRU).

References

1.Shah, MN, Rathouz, PJ, Chin, MH. Emergency department utilization by non-institutionalized elders. Acad Emerg Med 2001 8(3):267–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Brown, EM, Goel, V.. Factors related to emergency department use: results from the Ontario Health Survey 1990. Ann Emerg Med 1994;24(6):1083–1091.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Béland, F., Lemay, A., Philibert, L., Maheux, B., Gravel, G.. Elderly patients' use of hospital-based emergency services. Med Care 1991;29(5):408–416.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Denman, SJ, Ettinger, WH, Zarkin, BA, Coon, PJ, Casani, JA. Short-term outcomes of elderly patients discharged from an emergency department. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37(10):937–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.McCusker, J., Ardman, O., Bellavance, F., Belzile, E., Cardin, S., Verdon, J.. Use of community services by seniors before and after an emergency visit. Can J Aging 2001;20(2):193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.McCusker, J., Bellavance, F., Cardin, S., Belzile, E., Verdon, J.. Prediction of hospital utilization among elderly patients during the six months after an emergency department visit. Ann Emerg Med 2000;36(5):438–445.Google Scholar
7.Adams, JG, Gerson, LW. A new model for emergency care of geriatric patients (Commentary). Acad Emerg Med 2003;10(3):271–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Currie, CT, Lawson, PM, Robertson, CE, Jones, A.. Elderly patients discharged from accident and emergency departments: their dependency and support. Arch Emerg Med 1984;1(4):205–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Hedges, JR, Singal, BM, Rousseau, EW, Sanders, AB, Bernstein, E., McNamara, RM. Geriatric patient emergency visits, part 2: perceptions of visits by geriatric and younger patients. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21(7):808–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Brookoff, D., Minniti-Hill, M. (1994). Emergency department-based home care. Ann Emerg Med 1992;23(5):1101–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Gerson, LW, Rousseau, EW, Hogna, TM, Bernstein, E., Kalbfleisch, N.. Multicenter study of case finding in elderly emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 1995;2:729–734.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Dalby, DM, Sellors, JW, Fraser, FD, Fraser, C., van Ineveld, CHM, Pickard, L., et al. . Screening seniors for risk of functional decline: results of a survey in family practice. Can J Public Health 1999;90(2):133–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13.Bowns, I., Challis, D., Tong, M.. Case finding in elderly people: validation of a postal questionnaire. Br J Gen Pract 1991;41:100–104.Google ScholarPubMed
14.Pacala, JT, Boult, C., Boult, L.. Predictive validity of a questionnaire that identifies older persons at risk for hospital admission. J Am Geriatr Soc 1995;43(4):374–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15.Hébert, R., Bravo, G., Korner-Bitensky, N., Voyer, L.. Predictive validity of a postal questionnaire for screening community-dwelling elderly individuals at risk of functional decline. Age Ageing 1996;25:159–167.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16.McCusker, J., Kakuma, R., Abrahamowicz, M.. Predictors of functional decline in the hospitalized elderly: a systematic review. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2002;57A(9):M569–M577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.McCusker, J., Bellavance, F., Cardin, S., Trépanier, S., Verdon, J., Ardman, O.. Detection of older people at increased risk of adverse health outcomes after an emergency visit: the ISAR screening tool. J Am Geriatr Soc 1999;47(10):1229–1237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18.McCusker, J., Cardin, S., Bellavance, F., Belzile, É. Return to the emergency department among elders: patterns and predictors. Acad Emerg Med 2000;7(3):249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dendukuri, N., McCusker, J., Belzile, E.. The Identification of Seniors at Risk screening tool: further evidence of concurrent and predictive validity. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52(2):290–296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20.Meldon, SW, Mion, LC, Palmer, RM, Drew, BL, Connor, JT, Lewicki, LJ. A brief risk-stratification tool to predict repeat emergency department visits and hospitalization in older patients discharged from the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10(3):224–232.Google ScholarPubMed
21.McCusker, J., Verdon, J., Tousignant, P., Poulin de Courval, L., Dendukuri, N., Belzile, E.. Rapid emergency department intervention for elders reduces risk of functional decline: results of a multi-centre randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2001;49(10):1272–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.McCusker, J., Jacobs, P., Dendukuri, N., Latimer, E., Tousignant, P., Verdon, J.. Cost-effectiveness of a brief 2-stage emergency department intervention for high risk elders: results of a quasi-randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med 2003;41(1):45–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23.Caplan, GA, Williams, AJ, Daly, B., Abraham, K.. A randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department: the DEED II study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52(9):1417–1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Runciman, P., Currie, C., Nicol, M., Green, L., McKay, V.. Discharge of elderly people from an accident and emergency department: evaluation of health visitor follow-up. J Adv Nurs 1996;24:711–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.McCusker, J., Dendukuri, N., Tousignant, P., Verdon, J., Poulin de Courval, L., Belzile, E.. Rapid two-stage emergency department intervention for seniors: impact on continuity of care. Acad Emerg Med 2003;10(3):233–243.Google ScholarPubMed
26.Hulscher, M., Wensing, M., van der Weijden, T., Grol, R.. Interventions to implement prevention in primary care. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1997;(1).Google Scholar
27.Fournier, MA, Leclerc, C., Contandriopoulos, AP, Kergoat, MJ, Latour, J., Lebel, P., et al. . Les unités de courte durée gériatriques au Québec: portrait de la situation. Montréal, QC: Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé (GRIS); 1999. p. R99–R108.Google Scholar
28.Hébert, R., Durand, PJ, Dubuc, N., Tourigny, A. . Frail elderly patients. new model for integrated service delivery. Can Fam Physician 2003;49:992–997.Google ScholarPubMed
29.Goldberg, T., Chavin, S.. Preventive medicine and screening in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 1997;45:344–354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30.Rogers, E.. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed.New York: Free Press; 2003.Google Scholar
31.Last, JM. A dictionary of epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.Google Scholar
32.Warburton, RN, Parke, B., Church, W., McCusker, J.. Identification of seniors at risk: process evaluation of a screening and referral program for patients aged 75 and over in a community hospital emergency department. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2004;17(6):339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Logan, J., Graham, ID. Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Sci Commun 1998;20(2):227–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.O'Brien, TM, Oxman, A., Davis, D., Haynes, R., Freemantle, N., Harvey, E.. Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1997;(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Thomson O'Brien, M., Oxman, A., Davis, D., Freemantle, N., Harvey, E.. Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Library 2000;(1):13.Google ScholarPubMed
36.Lavis, J., Davies, H., Oxman, A., Denis, J-L, Golden-Biddle, K., Ferlie, E.. Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(Supp 1):S1–S35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed