Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T00:05:03.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“That Party was Born without a Soul.” Re-examining the Populism of the Saskatchewan Party

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2025

Simon Enoch*
Affiliation:
Saskatchewan Office of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, 2138 McIntyre, Regina, SK, S4P 2R7 Department of Politics and International Studies, University of Regina
Charles Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Political Studies at St. Thomas More College, University of Saskatchewan, 1437 College Dr., Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0W6
*
Corresponding author: Simon Enoch; Email: simon@policyalternatives.ca

Abstract

For the Saskatchewan Party (SKP), identifying with the Western populist tradition was essential to both its creation and initial electoral viability, leading many political commentators to regularly refer to the SKP as a right-wing populist party. Yet scholars have been much more reticent to classify the SKP as an authentically Canadian populist party in the style of the Reform Party of Canada. Part of this disconnect is a result of the SKP's uneven and opportunistic use of populism throughout its history. Indeed, this article argues that the SKP's initial commitment to populism was largely performative, embraced to fend off the challenge of a potential provincial Reform Party. Once the utility of the SKP's performative populism threatened its electoral viability, most of the party's symbolic nods to populism were abandoned. Yet, more recently, the SKP has embraced a new form of populism that merges its pro-business support for the region's oil and gas industry with right-wing policies that are often linked to its rural base. This form of populism, defined as extractive populism, demonstrates that the SKP continues to use populist discourse opportunistically when its right-wing base is threatened.

Résumé

Résumé

Pour le Parti saskatchewanais (SKP), l'identification à la tradition populiste occidentale était essentielle à la fois à sa création et à sa viabilité électorale initiale, ce qui a conduit de nombreux commentateurs politiques à fréquemment qualifier le SKP de parti populiste de droite. Pourtant, les chercheurs se sont montrés beaucoup plus réticents à classer le SKP comme un parti populiste authentiquement canadien semblable au style du Parti réformiste du Canada. Cette différenciation est en partie le résultat de l'utilisation inégale et opportuniste du populisme par le SKP tout au long de son histoire. En effet, cet article soutient que l'engagement initial du SKP au populisme était largement performatif, adopté pour repousser la compétition d'un éventuel parti réformiste provincial. Une fois que l'utilité du populisme performatif du SKP menaçait sa viabilité électorale, la plupart des clins d’œil du parti au populisme ont été abandonnés. Pourtant, plus récemment, le SKP a adopté une nouvelle forme de populisme qui fusionne son soutien favorable aux entreprises à l'industrie pétrolière et gazière de la région avec des politiques de droite souvent liées à sa base rurale. Cette forme de populisme, définie comme le populisme extractif, démontre que le SKP continue d'utiliser le discours populiste de manière opportuniste lorsque l'appui de sa base électorale de droite est menacé.

Type
Research Note/Note de recherche
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Canadian Political Science Association (l’Association canadienne de science politique) and/et la Société québécoise de science politique

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Drew and Fletcher, Robson. 2016. “Saskatchewan Party received millions in donations from Alberta companies.” CBC News, https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/saskatchewan-party-donations-alberta-companies-1.3831759 (February 14, 2024).Google Scholar
Barney, Darin and Laycock, David. 1999. “Right Populists and Plebiscitary Politics in Canada.” Party Politics 5 (3): 317–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Raymond. 2008. “The Saskatchewan Party and the Politics of Branding.” In Saskatchewan Politics: Crowding the Centre, ed. Leeson, Howard. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.Google Scholar
Braden, Bonny. 1997a. “Saskatchewan party seeks opposition status.The StarPhoenix, August 9, A1.Google Scholar
Braden, Bonny. 1997b. “Reformers to weigh options at regional meeting.” The StarPhoenix, October 10, A10.Google Scholar
Braden, Bonny. 1997c. “Reformers stuck with status quo.” Saskatoon Star-Phoenix, October 14, A3.Google Scholar
Braden, Bonny. 1999. “Hermanson vows to travel with farmers to press Ottawa.The StarPhoenix, August 26, A3.Google Scholar
Brewer, Mark. 2016. “Populism in American Politics.” The Forum 14 (3): 249–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Press. 1997a. “New Saskatchewan party aims to unite the right.” Canadian Press Newswire, August 8.Google Scholar
Canadian Press. 1997b. “Reformers don't agree on new party.” Regina Leader-Post, August 19, A1.Google Scholar
Canovan, Margaret. 1999. “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy.” Political Studies 47: 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carty, R.K and Cross, W.. 2010. “Political Parties and the Practice of Brokerage Politics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Canadian Politics, eds. Courtney, J.C. and Smith, D.E.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheater, Glen. 1998. “Farmers anxiously await rescue plan.” Globe and Mail, December 14, A3.Google Scholar
Conway, Aidan and Conway, John. 2015. “Saskatchewan: From Cradle of Social Democracy to Neoliberalism's Sandbox.” In Transforming Provincial Politics: The Political Economy of Canada's Provinces and Territories in a Neoliberal Era, eds. Evans, Bryan and Smith, Charles. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Cuenco, Michael. 2022. “The Canadian Ideology.” American Affairs Journal. https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2022/05/the-canadian-ideology/ (May 20, 2024).Google Scholar
Dean, Jonathan and Maiguashca, Bice. 2020. “Did somebody say populism? Toward a renewal and reorientation of populism studies.” Journal of Political Ideologies 25 (1): 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, Emily. 2017. “Inside Saskatchewan's Oil Economy.” Briarpatch Magazine, January 1.Google Scholar
Eaton, Emily and Enoch, Simon. 2021. “Make the Energy Sector Great Again: Extractive Populism in Saskatchewan.” In Divided: Populism, Polarization and Power in the New Saskatchewan, eds. Jaffe, JoAnn, Elliott, Patricia, and Sellers, Cora. Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Eisler, Dale. 2022. From Left to Right: Saskatchewan's Political and Economic Transformation. Regina: University of Regina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enoch, Simon. 2011. “The “New Saskatchewan:” Neoliberal Renewal or Redux?Socialist Studies Spring/Fall: 191215.Google Scholar
Enoch, Simon. 2022. “The Oil Industry's Frankenstein.” Briarpatch Magazine, October.Google Scholar
Enoch, Simon and Korpan, Roxanne. 2021. Big Oil in City Hall: Climate and Energy Politics in the Queen City. Regina: Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Saskatchewan Office.Google Scholar
Fraser, D.C. 2017. “Irate Wall compares federal carbon price plan to ‘ransom note’; Premier reiterates vow to fight anything imposed by Ottawa on Saskatchewan.” The StarPhoenix, May 19, A3.Google Scholar
Gatehouse, Jonathon. 1999. “Opposition leader demands action from Romanow.” National Post, September 18, A7.Google Scholar
Gunster, Shane. 2019. “Extractive populism and the future of Canada.” The Monitor. July/August.Google Scholar
Gunster, Shane and Saurette, Paul. 2014. “Storylines in the Sands: News, Narrative and Ideology in the Calgary Herald.” Canadian Journal of Communication 39: 333–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunster, Shane, Neubauer, Robert, Bermingham, John, and Massie, Alicia. 2021. “‘Our Oil’ Extractive Populism in Canadian Social Media.” In Regime of Obstruction: How Corporate Power Blocks Energy Democracy, ed. Carroll, William. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
Kiely, Ray. 2020. “Assessing Conservative Populism: A New Double Movement or Neoliberal Populism?Development and Change 51 (2): 398417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krawetz, Gail. 2017. Risk and Reward: The Birth of the Saskatchewan Party. Regina: Friesen Books.Google Scholar
Laughlin, Colin. 1997. “By the time Reform's internal debate is over.” CanWest News, November 23.Google Scholar
Laycock, David. 1995. Populism and Democratic Thought in the Canadian Prairies, 1910 to 1945. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Laycock, David. 2005. “Populism and the New Right in English Canada.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. Panizza, Francisco. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Laycock, David. 2012. “Populism and democracy in Canada's Reform Party.” In Populism in Europe and the Americas, eds. Mudde, Cas and Rovira, Cristobal. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1968. Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan: A Study in Political Sociology. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Macaulay, Marcia. 2022. Populism and Populist Discourse in North America. Cham: Palgrave-MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macneil, Robert. 2020. “Is Canadian carbon pricing here to stay? The outlook after 14 elections.” Environmental Politics 29 (2): 354–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 1997a. “Time ripe for Reform in Sask.” The StarPhoenix, August 7, A6.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 1997b. “Party has its work cut out for it.” The StarPhoenix, November 17, A4.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 2000a. “Hermanson wants an apology.” Regina Leader-Post, February 3, A4.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 2000b. “Right-wing and Populist too.” Regina Leader Post, June 14, A11.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 2002. “Conventions show party quirks.” The StarPhoenix, November 16, A16.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 2005. “Healthy debate tests mettle.” The StarPhoenix, November 18, A12.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 2017. “Wall's politicking, contempt for Trudeau becoming problematic.” The StarPhoenix, May 10, A7.Google Scholar
Mandryk, Murray. 2024. “Harder push to right big dilemma for Moe's Sask. Party.” Regina Leader-Post, March 18, A5.Google Scholar
McGrane, David. 2005. “Western alienation or mere critique of federal government policies? Saskatchewan social democrats view of federalism from 1900 to the present.” International Journal of Canadian Studies 32: 205–35.Google Scholar
Moe, Scott. 2019. “There's Their Real Agenda: The Federal Government Is Going to Study the Complete Elimination of Our Oil and Gas Industry,” twitter.com/PremierScottMoe/status/1172171477849956352 (September 12, 2019).Google Scholar
Moffit, Benjamin. 2020. Populism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Jim. 1997. “Reformers divided over move into SK.” Edmonton Journal, August 19, C8.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cass. 2004. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulawka, Brian. 1997. “How close is too close?Alberta Report, 24: 7.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2020. “Measuring Populism Worldwide: Faculty Research Working Paper Series.” https://www.hks.harvard.edu/publications/measuring-populism-worldwide (March 12, 2024).Google Scholar
Panizza, Francisco. 2005. “Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.” In Populism and the Mirror of Democracy, ed. Panizza, Francisco. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
Parker, James. 1997. “Reform true party of the right.” The StarPhoenix. September 20, A3.Google Scholar
Parker, James. 2000. “Scent of power tempers debate in Sask. Party.” The StarPhoenix, November 7, A10.Google Scholar
Parker, James. 2001. “Crowns’ fate under Sask. Party debated.” The StarPhoenix, July 27, A3.Google Scholar
Parker, James. 2003. “New Democrats score razor-thin victory.” The StarPhoenix, November 6, A1.Google Scholar
Patten, Steve. 1996. “Preston Manning's Populism: Constructing the Common Sense of the Common People.” Studies in Political Economy 50 (1): 95132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rassmussen, Ken. 2021. “The Suburbanization of Saskatchewan Politics.” In Divided: Populism, Polarization and Power in the New Saskatchewan, eds Jaffe, JoAnn, Elliott, Patricia, and Sellers, Cora. Halifax: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Richardson, Dale. 2022. “Experts’ missing white paper's true message; Protecting Sask. families, businesses is the point.” The StarPhoenix, November 1, A5.Google Scholar
Salloum, Alec. 2023. “Government passes bill to establish Saskatchewan Revenue Agency.” Regina Leader-Post, May 10.Google Scholar
Salloum, Alec. 2024. “Poll suggests NDP has narrow lead in province.” Regina Leader-Post, February 12, A1.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Party. 1999. The Way Up! Election Platform of the Saskatchewan Party. Regina: Saskatchewan Party.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Party. 2003. Let's Get Saskatchewan Growing: 2003 Election. Regina: Saskatchewan Party.Google Scholar
Saskatchewan Party. 2007. Securing the Future: New Ideas for Saskatchewan. Regina: Saskatchewan Party.Google Scholar
Sinclair, Peter. 1973. “The Saskatchewan CCF: Ascent to Power and the Decline of Socialism.” Canadian Historical Review 54 (4): 424–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Charles. 2018. “Active Incrementalism and the Politics of Austerity in the “New Saskatchewan.” In The Public Sector in an Age of Austerity: Perspectives from Canada's Provinces and Territories, eds. Evans, Bryan and Fanelli, Carlo. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Charles. 2024. “‘Workers in Saskatchewan now have a clear-cut bill of rights:’ Labour Law, Social Democracy, and the Saskatchewan Trade Union Act, 1944-1950.” Labour/Le Travail. Forthcoming Fall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taube, Michael. 2012. “Wall brings Harperism to the provinces.” Ottawa Citizen, November 21, A9.Google Scholar
Walter, Ron. 1999. “Platform pitches aid.” Moose Jaw Times-Herald, August 26, A1.Google Scholar
Wishlow, Kevin. 2001. “Rethinking the Polarization Thesis: The Formation of the Saskatchewan Party, 1997-2001.” In Saskatchewan Politics into the Twenty-First Century, ed. Leeson, Howard. Regina: Canadian Plains Research Center.Google Scholar
Wood, James. 2005. “Sask. Party retools policies.” The StarPhoenix. February 7, A1.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Mark. 1997a. “Reform sets tone for Sask. party.” Regina Leader-Post, November 18, D7.Google Scholar
Wyatt, Mark. 1997b. “Sask. Party MLAs willing to put seats to the test.” The StarPhoenix, November 17, A3.Google Scholar
Young, Walter D. 1969. The Anatomy of a Party: The National CCF, 1932-61. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zakuta, Leo. 1964. A Protest Movement Becalmed: A Study of Change in the CCF. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar