Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-ff9ft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T19:25:42.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where do lmplicatures come from?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Rod Bertolet
Rod Bertolet*
Affiliation:
Purdue University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There is trouble at the foundations of Grice's theory of conversational implicature, or so I shall argue. Grice's commentators seem to agree, and some of Grice's own remarks suggest, that every case of implicature is one in which ‘the speaker gets across more than he says…. ’ The problem is that there are cases in which nothing is said - in which case it is not clear that there is any vehicle by which the implicature might be carried, and consequently not clear that Grice's theory can account for the implicature which does appear to be carried.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 181 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austin, J.L.: 1957, ‘Pretending,’ in Urmson, J. and Warnock, G. eds., Philosophical Papers (Oxford 1961), 253-71Google Scholar
Gordon, D. and G. Lakoff: 1971, ‘Conversational Postulates,’ in Cole, P. and Morgan, J. eds., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3 (Academic Press 1975). 83–106Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.: 1961, ‘The Causal Theory of Perception,’ in Swarts, R. ed., Perceiving, Sensing, and Knowing (Anchor 1965). 438-72Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.: 1968, ‘Utterer's Meaning, Sentence-Meaning, and Word-Meaning,’ in Searle, J. ed., The Philosophy of Language (Oxford 1971). 54–70Google Scholar
Grice, H.P.: 1969, ‘Utterer's Meaning and Intentions,’ The Philosophical Review, 78 (1969) 147-77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation,’ in Cole and Morgan, 41-58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H.P.: 1978, ‘Further Notes on Logic and Conversation,’ in Cole, P. ed., Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9 (Academic Press 1978). 113-27Google Scholar
Huntley, M.: 1976, ‘Presupposition and Implicature,’ Semantikos, 1 (1976) 67-88Google Scholar
Katz, J. and Langendoen, T.: 1976, ‘Pragmatics and Presupposition: in Bever, T. Katz and Langedoen, eds., An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Ability (Crowell 1976), 393–413Google Scholar
Searle, J.: 1969, Speech Acts (Cambridge 1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J.: 1979, ‘Metaphor: in Ortony, A. ed., Metaphor and Thought (Cambridge 1979), 92–123Google Scholar
Schiffer, S.: 1972, Meaning (Oxford 1972)Google Scholar
Walker, R.: 1975, ‘Conversational Implicatures,’ in Blackburn, S. ed., Meaning, Reference, and Necessity (Cambridge 1975). 133-81Google Scholar
Wilson, D. and Sperber, D.: ‘On Grice's Theory of Conversation: in Werth, P. ed., Conversation, Speech and Discourse (Croom Helm 1981)Google Scholar