Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Rahe, M.
1979.
Finite coding factors of Markov generators.
Israel Journal of Mathematics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 4,
p.
349.
Kieffer, John C.
1982.
A direct proof that vwb processes are closed in the $$\bar d$$ -metric.
Israel Journal of Mathematics,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
154.
2002.
Vol. 1,
Issue. ,
p.
205.
Hoffman, Christopher
2003.
The scenery factor of the [𝑇,𝑇⁻¹] transformation is not loosely Bernoulli.
Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society,
Vol. 131,
Issue. 12,
p.
3731.
THOUVENOT, J.-P.
2008.
Two facts concerning the transformations which satisfy the weak Pinsker property.
Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 2,
p.
689.
van Handel, Ramon
2012.
On the exchange of intersection and supremum of σ-fields in filtering theory.
Israel Journal of Mathematics,
Vol. 192,
Issue. 2,
p.
763.
Austin, Tim
2018.
Measure concentration and the weak Pinsker property.
Publications mathématiques de l'IHÉS,
Vol. 128,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
or Hamming distance plays an important role. Two finite state stationary processes are close in the
metric if, on the average, strings from one process can be matched with strings from the other process so that their outputs agree with high frequency. Since such agreement must hold in the arbitrarily distant future, it might at first seem difficult to control the pairing.