Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-31T14:39:51.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On a Question of Seidel Concerning Holomorphic Functions Bounded on a Spiral

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

K. F. Barth  and
W. J. Schneider
K. F. Barth
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York
W. J. Schneider
Affiliation:
Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Let S be a spiral contained in D = {|z| < 1} such that S tends to C = {|z| = 1}. For the sake of brevity, by “f is bounded on S” we shall mean that f is holomorphic in D, unbounded, and bounded on S. The existence of such functions was first discussed by Valiron (9; 10); see also (1; 3; 8). Valiron also proved that any function that is “bounded on a spiral” must have the asymptotic value ∞ (10, p. 432). Functions that are bounded on a spiral may also have finite asymptotic values (1, p. 1254). In view of the above, Seidel has raised the question (oral communication): “Does there exist a function bounded on a spiral that has only the asymptotic value ∞?”. The following theorem answers this question affirmatively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 21 , 1969 , pp. 1255 - 1262
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1969

References

1. Bagemihl, F. and Seidel, W., Spiral and other asymptotic paths, and paths of complete indétermination, of analytic and meromorphic functions, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 39 (1953), 1251–1258.Google Scholar
2. Bagemihl, F. and Seidel, W., Some boundary properties of analytic functions, Math. Z. 61 (1954), 186–199.Google Scholar
3. Bagemihl, F., Erdôs, P., and Seidel, W., Sur quelques propriétés frontières des fonctions holomorphes définies par certains produits dans le cercle-unité, Ann. Sci. Ecole Norm. Sup. (3) 70 (1953), 135–147.Google Scholar
4. Barth, K. F. and Schneider, W. J., On a problem of Bagemihl and Erdôs concerning the distribution of zeros of an annular function, J. Reine Angew. Math. 234 (1969), 179–183.Google Scholar
5. Barth, K. F. and Schneider, W. J., Exponentiation of functions in MacLane's class A, J. Reine Angew. Math. 236 (1969), 120–130.Google Scholar
6. Mergelyan, S. N., On the representation of functions by series of polynomials on closed sets (Russian) Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR (N.S.) 78 (1951), 405–408; Amer. Math. Soc. Transi., no. 85, Providence, R.I., 1953.Google Scholar
7. Schneider, W. J., An entire transcendental function whose inverse takes sets of finite measure into sets of finite measure, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1966), 841–842.Google Scholar
8. Schneider, W. J., An elementary proof and extension of an example of Valiron, Pacific J. Math, (to appear).Google Scholar
9. Valiron, G., Sur certaines singularités des fonctions holomorphes dans un cercle, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 198 (1934), 2065–2067.Google Scholar
10. Valiron, G., Sur les singularités de certaines fonctions holomorphes et de leurs inverses, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 15 (1936), 423–435.Google Scholar
11. Walsh, J. L., Interpolation and approximation by rational functions in the complex domain, 3rd éd., Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., Vol. 20 (American Math. Soc, Providence, R.I., 1960).Google Scholar