Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-ks5gx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-18T21:33:40.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An arithmetic property of intertwining operators for p-adic groups

Part of: Lie groups Discontinuous groups and automorphic forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2021

A. Raghuram Open the ORCID record for A. Raghuram [Opens in a new window]
A. Raghuram*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Fordham University at Lincoln Center, New York, NY 10023, USA
*
e-mail: araghuram@fordham.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The main aim of this article is to show that normalised standard intertwining operator between induced representations of p-adic groups, at a very specific point of evaluation, has an arithmetic origin. This result has applications to Eisenstein cohomology and the special values of automorphic L-functions.

Keywords

intertwining operatorsp-adic groupspoint of evaluationarithmeticity

MSC classification

Primary: 22E50: Representations of Lie and linear algebraic groups over local fields
Secondary: 22E55: Representations of Lie and linear algebraic groups over global fields and adèle rings 11F67: Special values of automorphic $L$-series, periods of modular forms, cohomology, modular symbols 11F70: Representation-theoretic methods; automorphic representations over local and global fields
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Mathematics , Volume 75 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 83 - 107
Check for updates
Copyright
© Canadian Mathematical Society 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Atobe, H. and Gan, W. T., On the local Langlands correspondence and Arthur conjecture for even orthogonal groups . Represent. Theory 21(2017), 354–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, I. N. and Zelevinsky, A. V., Induced representations of reductive $p$ -adic groups. I . Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. 10(1977), no. 4, 441–472.Google Scholar
Bhagwat, C. and Raghuram, A., Eisenstein cohomology for orthogonal groups and the special values of L-functions for $\mathrm{GL}(1)\times O(2n).$ Preprint, 2020. arxiv:2005.01062Google Scholar
Borel, A., Automorphic L-functions. In: Borel, A. and Casselman, W. (eds.) Automorphic forms, representations and L-functions (Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics held at Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1977), Proceedings of Symposia Pure Mathematics, XXXIII, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, Part 2, pp. 27–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clozel, L., Motifs et formes automorphes: applications du principe de fonctorialité. (in French) [Motives and automorphic forms: applications of the functoriality principle]. In: Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and $L$ -functions. Vol. I (Ann Arbor, MI, 1988), Perspectives in Mathematics, 10, Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990, pp. 77–159.Google Scholar
Deligne, P., Valeurs de fonctions $L$ et périodes d’intégrales (in French). In: Automorphic forms, representations and $L$ -functions (Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics held at Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, 1977), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXIII, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1979, Part 2, pp. 313–346, with an appendix by N. Koblitz and A. Ogus.Google Scholar
Gan, W. T. and Raghuram, A., Arithmeticity for periods of automorphic forms . In: Prasad, D., Rajan, C. S., Sankarnarayanan, A., and Sengupta, J. (eds.) Automorphic representations and L-functions, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Studies in Mathematics, 22, TIFR, Mumbai, 2013, pp. 187–229.Google Scholar
Harder, G. and Raghuram, A., Eisenstein cohomology for ${\mathrm{GL}}_N$ the special values of Rankin–Selberg L-functions, Annals of Math. Studies, 203, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiermann, V. and Opdam, E., On the tempered L-functions conjecture . Amer. J. Math. 135(2013), no. 3, 777–799.Google Scholar
Jacquet, H., Generic representations . In: Carmona, J. and Verne, M. (eds.), Non-commutative harmonic analysis, Lecture Notes in Math., 587, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1977, pp. 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H., Automorphic L-functions . In: Cogdell, J., Kim, H. H., and Ram Murty, M. (eds.) Lectures on automorphic L-functions, Fields Inst. Monogr., 20, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2004, pp. 97–201.Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, M. and Raghuram, A., Eisenstein cohomology for unitary groups and the arithmetic of Asai $L$ -functions. Preprint, in preparation.Google Scholar
Kudla, S., The local Langlands correspondence: the non-Archimedean case . In: Jannsen, U., Kleiman, S., and Serre, J.-P. (eds.) Motives, Part 2 (Seattle, WA, 1991), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., 55, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1994, pp. 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlands, R., Euler products (A James K. Whittemore Lecture in Mathematics given at Yale University, 1967), Yale Mathematical Monographs, 1, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT and London, 1971.Google Scholar
Mœglin, C. and Tadić, M., Construction of discrete series for classical $p$ -adic groups . J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15(2002), no. 3, 715–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, D. and Raghuram, A., Representation theory of $\mathrm{GL}(n)$ over non-Archimedean local fields. In: School on automorphic forms on $\mathrm{GL}(n)$ , ICTP Lecture Notes, 21, Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, 2008, pp. 159–205.Google Scholar
Raghuram, A., On the special values of certain Rankin–Selberg  $L$ -functions and applications to odd symmetric power $L$ -functions of modular forms . Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2010(2010), 334–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnp127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raghuram, A., Eisenstein cohomology for ${{GL}}_N$ the special values of Rankin–Selberg L-functions-II. Preprint, 2020.Google Scholar
Shahidi, F., On certain L-functions . Amer. J. Math. 103(1981), no. 2, 297–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahidi, F., On the Ramanujan conjecture and finiteness of poles for certain L-functions . Ann. Math. 127(1988), no. 3, 547–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahidi, F., A proof of Langlands’ conjecture on Plancherel measures; complementary series for p-adic groups . Ann. Math. 132(1990), no. 2, 273–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahidi, F., On the Ramanujan conjecture for quasisplit groups . Asian J. Math. 8(2004), no. 4, 813–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahidi, F., Eisenstein series and automorphic L-functions, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ., 58, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahidi, F., Arthur packets and the Ramanujan conjecture . Kyoto J. Math. 51(2011), no. 1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldspurger, J.-L., La formule de Plancherel pour les groupes p-adiques (d’après Harish-Chandra) . J. Inst. Math. Jussieu 2(2003), no. 2, 235–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar