Hostname: page-component-5447f9dfdb-89v5q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T11:12:09.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Case of Surface Constraint Violation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2016

John J. McCarthy
John J. McCarthy*
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The idea that constraints on well-formedness play a role in determining phonological alternations, which dates back at least to Kisseberth’s (1970) pioneering work, has by now achieved almost universal acceptance. A tacit assumption of this program, largely unquestioned even in recent research, is the notion that valid constraints must state true generalizations about surface structure or some other level of phonological representation. Anything different would seem antithetical to the very idea of a well-formedness constraint.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Archangeli, Diana 1984. Underspecification in Yawelmani Phonology and Morphology. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Archangeli, Diana, and Pulleyblank, Douglas 1992. Grounded Phonology. Ms.Google Scholar
Bird, Steven 1990. Constraint-Based Phonology. PhD thesis, Edinburgh University.Google Scholar
Borowsky, Toni 1986. Topics in English and Lexical Phonology. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea 1988. Toward a Theory of Phonological Alphabets. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John 1990. Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Blackwell’s.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John 1991. Phonology as an Intelligent System. Pp. 247–267 in Bridges between Psychology and Linguistics. Jo Napoli, Donna and Kegl, Judy, eds. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos 1986. English Plosive Allophones and Ambisyllabicity. Gramma. 10:119–141.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce 1986. Inalterability in CV Phonology. Language. 48:525–540.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce 1989. The Prosodic Hierarchy in Meter. Pp. 201–260 in Rhythm and Meter. Kiparsky, Paul and Youmans, Gilbert, eds. Orlando: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hung, Henrietta 1993. The Rhythmic and Prosodic Organization of Edge Constituents. PhD thesis, Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Inkelas, Sharon 1989. Prosodic Constituency in the Lexicon. PhD thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko 1986. Syllable Theory in Prosodic Phonology. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko 1989. A Prosodic Theory of Epenthesis. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 7:217–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itô, Junko, Kitagawa, Yoshihisa, and Mester, R. Armin 1992. Prosodic Type Preservation in Japanese: Evidence from zuuja-go . SRC-92-05, Syntax Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko, and Mester, R. Armin 1992. Weak Layering and Word Binarity. Ms.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto 1909. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles Part I: Sounds and Spellings. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Johansson, Stig 1973. Linking and Intrusive /r/ in English: A Case for a More Concrete Phonology. Studia Linguistica. (Lund) 27:53–68.Google Scholar
Kahn, Daniel 1976. Syllable-Based Generalizations in English Phonology. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Kaisse, Ellen 1985. Connected Speech. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Robert 1992. Harmonic Phonology Within One Language: An Analysis of Yidiny . MA thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Kisseberth, Charles 1970. On the Functional Unity of Phonological Rules. Linguistic Inquiry. 1:291–306.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Linda 1991. Laryngeal Features and Laryngeal Neutralization. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John 1991. Synchronic Rule Inversion. Pp. 192–207 in Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Sutton, Laurel A., Johnson, Christopher, and Shields, Ruth, eds. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan 1990. Prosodic Morphology and Templatic Morphology. Pp. 1–54 in Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics 2. Eid, Mushira and McCarthy, John, eds. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Prince, Alan 1993. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Ms.Google Scholar
McCarthy, John, and Taub, Alison 1993. Review of Paradis, Carole and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. The Special Status of Coronals. Phonology. Phonetics and Phonology Series 2. [In press.]Google Scholar
Mester, R. Armin 1993. The Quantitative Trochee in Latin. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. [In press.]Google Scholar
Mester, R. Armin, and Itô, Junko 1989. Feature Predictability and Underspecification: Palatal Prosody in Japanese Mimetics. Language. 65:258–293.Google Scholar
Mohanan, K.P. 1985a. Syllable Structure and Lexical Strata in English. Phonology Yearbook. 2:139–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohanan, K.P. 1985b. The Phonology of /r/ in RP. Ms.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott 1987. Vowel Shortening in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. 5:485–518.Google Scholar
Myers, Scott 1991. Persistent Rules. Linguistic Inquiry. 22:315–344.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene 1982. Prosodic Domains of External Sandhi Rules. Pp. 225–255 in The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part 1. van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina, and Vogel, Irene 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1980. La règle de Canadian raising et l’analyse en structure syllabique. Canadian Journal of Linguistics. 25:35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1988a. On Constraints and Repair Strategies. The Linguistic Review. 6:71–97.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole 1988b. Toward a Theory of Constraint Violations. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics. 5:1–44.Google Scholar
Paradis, Carole, and Prunet, Jean-François, eds. 1991. The Special Status of Coronals. Phonetics and Phonology Series 2. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Piggott, Glyne 1991. Apocope and the Licensing of Empty-Headed Syllables. The Linguistic Review. 8:287–318.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1991a. Optimality. Paper read at Arizona Phonology Conference, Tucson.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1991b. Notes on Connectionism and Harmony Theory in Linguistics. Technical Report CU-CS-533-91. Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado, Boulder.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1992. Optimality: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Paper read at 12th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Prince, Alan, and Smolensky, Paul 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Ms.Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey 1976. The Duke of York Gambit. Journal of Linguistics. 12:83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthall, Samuel 1993. The Phonology of Vowels and Glides. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James 1992a. Against Rule Inversion: The Development of English [r]-Sandhi. Ms.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James 1992b. Towards Declarative Phonology. Edinburgh Working Papers in Cognitive Science. 7:1–26.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1972. The Phrase Phonology of English and French. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1981. Epenthesis and Degenerate Syllables in Cairene Arabic. Pp. 209–232 in Theoretical Issues in the Grammar of Semitic Languages. (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 3). Borer, Hagit and Aoun, Youssef, eds. Cambridge, Mass.: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1982. The Syllable. Pp. 337–383 in The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part 2. van der Hulst, Harry and Smith, Norval, eds. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Tateishi, Koichi 1988. Constraints on Minor Phrase Formation in Japanese. Pp. 316–336 in Papers from the Twenty-Fourth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Brentari, Diane, Larson, Gary and MacLeod, Lyne, eds. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth, and Shen, Tong 1990. Prosodic Domains in Shanghai Chinese. Pp. 313–337 in The Phonology-Syntax Connection. Inkelas, Sharon and Zec, Draga, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sherer, Tim 1993. Prosodic Phonotactics. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Singh, Rajendra 1987. Well-Formedness Conditions and Phonological Theory. Pp. 27-3-285 in Phonologica 1984. Dressler, Wolfgang, Lushützky, Hans C., Pfeiffer, Oskar E. and John, R. Rennison, eds. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stampe, David 1979. A Dissertation on Natural Phonology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca 1982. Greek Prosodies and the Nature of Syllabification. PhD thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo 1972. Rule Inversion. Lingua. 29:209–242.Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene 1986. External Sandhi Rules Operating between Sentences. Pp. 55–64 in Sandhi Phenomena in the Languages of Europe. Andersen, Henning, ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zec, Draga 1992. Coda Constraints and Conditions on Syllable Weight. Paper read at Linguistics Colloquium, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold M. 1970. Auxiliary Reduction in English. Linguistic Inquiry. 1:323–336.Google Scholar