Hostname: page-component-69cd664f8f-tp5d2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-13T03:57:26.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seafood allergy is a specific and unique contraindication to the administration of ionic contrast media

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2015

Adam Schlifke  and
Joel M. Geiderman
Adam Schlifke
Affiliation:
UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, Calif.
Joel M. Geiderman*
Affiliation:
Ruth and Harry Roman Emergency Department, Department of Emergency Medicine, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
*
Department of Emergency Medicine, Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars–Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles CA 90048; 310 423-8780, fax 310 423-0424, geiderman@cshs.org

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Medical Mythology • Mythes médicaux
Information
Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , May 2003 , pp. 166 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians 2003

References

1.Keizur, JJ, Das, S.Current perspectives on intravascular contrast agents for radiological imaging. J Urology 1994;151:1470–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Lang, DM, Alpern, MB, Visintainer, PF, Smith, ST.Increased risk for anapyhlactoid reaction from contrast media in patients on beta-adrenergic blockers or with asthma. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:270–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Leder, R.Questions and answers. Am J Radiology 1997;169: 906–7.Google Scholar
4.Witten, DM, Hirsch, FD, Hartman, GW.Acute reactions to urographic contrast medium: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to history of hypersensitivity states. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 1973;119:832–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5.Shehadi, WH.Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media. Am J Radiology 1975;124:145–52.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Ansell, G, Tweedie, MCK, West, CR, Evans, P, Couch, L.The current status of reactions to intravenous contrast media. Invest Radiol 1980;15:S32–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hildreth, EA.Anaphylactoid reactions to iodinated contrast media. Hosp Pract (Off Ed) 1987;22(5A):77–85,89–90, 95.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Goss, JE, Chambers, CE, Heupler, FA.Laboratory performance standards committee of the society for cardiac angiography and interventions. Systematic anaphylactoid reactions to ICM during cardiac catheterization procedures: guidelines for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;34:99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Lang, DM, Alpern, MB, Visintainer, PF, Smith, ST.Increased risk for anapyhlactoid reaction from contrast media in patients on beta-adrenergic blockers or with asthma. Ann Intern Med 1991;115:270–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.ACR Standard for the use of intravascular contrast media. 2001 (Res. 51), effective 1/1/02. In: American College of Radiology Standards. Available: www.acr.org/departments/stand_accred/standards/dl_list.html#radonc (accessed 2003 Apr 7).Google Scholar
11.Halpern, JD, Hopper, KD, Arredondo, MG, Trautlein, JJ.Patient allergies: role in selective use of nonionic contrast material. Radiology 1996;199:359–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Cohan, RH, Ellis, JH, Dunnick, NR.Use of low-osmolar agents and premedication to reduce the frequency of adverse reactions to radiographic contrast media: a survey of the society of uroradiology. Radiology 1995;194:357–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar