Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-gtc7z Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-20T17:03:25.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where went the dung-breeding insects of the American bison?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2012

K. Tiberg  and
K.D. Floate
K. Tiberg
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 – 1 Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
K.D. Floate*
Affiliation:
Lethbridge Research Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 5403 – 1 Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
*
1Corresponding author (e-mail: Kevin.Floate@agr.gc.ca).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The demise of the American bison, Bison bison (L.), following European settlement has given rise to two hypotheses regarding the fate of their dung-associated insects. The “extant” hypothesis proposes that all of these taxa now persist in the dung of cattle, Bos taurus L. The “extinction” hypothesis proposes that a subset of these taxa were unable to make this transition and have gone extinct. We examined these hypotheses by comparing the response of coprophilous insects to dung of bison versus cattle on similar diets and versus dung of cattle on different diets. Results showed insects to be more responsive to changes in diet than to changes in host species and, therefore, were supportive of the extant hypothesis. To our knowledge, these data provide the first experimental comparisons of bison dung versus cattle dung as habitat for coprophilous insects.

Résumé

Le déclin des bisons d'Amérique, Bison bison (L.), après l—établissement des européens, a mené à l—élaboration de deux hypothèses concernant le sort des insectes associés à leur bouse. L'hypothèse de la «persistence» veut qu'un sous-ensemble de ces taxons survive dans la bouse des bovins domestiques, Bos taurus L. L'hypothèse de la «disparition» avance qu'un sous-ensemble de ces taxons n'a pas réussi à faire cette transition et s'est éteint. Nous examinons ces hypothèses en comparant les réactions d'insectes coprophiles à de la bouse de bisons par comparaison à de la bouse de bæufs nourris de régimes similaires et de la bouse de bæufs nourris de régimes différents. Les coléoptères réagissent plus fortement aux changements de régime alimentaire qu'aux changements d'espèce hôte; nos résultats appuient donc l'hypothèse de la persistance. À notre connaissance, ces données représentent les premières comparaisons expérimentales de la bouse de bisons et de la bouse de bæufs comme habitats pour les insectes coprophiles.

[Traduit par la Rédaction]

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 143 , Issue 5 , September 2011 , pp. 470 - 478
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barth, D. Karrer, M. Heinze-Mutz, E.M. Elster, N. 1994. Colonization and degradation of cattle-dung: aspects of sampling, fecal composition, and artificially formed pats. Environmental Entomology, 23: 571–578.Google Scholar
Bertone, M. Green, J. Washburn, S. Poore, M. Sorenson, C. Watson, D.W. 2005. Seasonal activity and species composition of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae and Geotrupidae) inhabiting cattle pastures in North Carolina. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 98: 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blume, R.R. 1985. A check-list, distributional record, and annotated bibliography of the insects associated with bovine droppings on pasture in America north of Mexico. Southwestern Entomologist (Supplement), 9: 1–55.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y. (Editor). 1991. Checklist of beetles of Canada and Alaska. Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Bousquet, Y. Laplante, S. 2006. Coleoptera Histeridae, NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Ontario.Google Scholar
Bowling, G.A. 1942. The introduction of cattle into colonial North America. Journal of Dairy Science, 25: 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amato, L.A. Knapp, F.W. Dahlman, D.L. 1980. Survival of the face fly in feces from cattle fed alfalfa hay or grain diets: effect of fermentation and microbial changes. Environmental Entomology, 9: 557–560.Google Scholar
Dickinson, C.H. Craig, G. 1990. Effects of water on the decomposition and release of nutrients from cow pats. New Phytologist, 115: 139–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickinson, C.H. Underhay, V.S.H. Ross, V. 1981. Effect of season, soil fauna and water content on the decomposition of cattle dung pats. New Phytologist, 88: 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, E.R. Lysyk, T.J. 1986. Response of a laboratory strain of the face fly to seasonal changes in manure quality. Journal of Agricultural Entomology, 3: 179–185.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. 1998. Off-target effects of ivermectin on insects and on dung degradation in southern Alberta, Canada. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 88: 25–35.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. 2007. Endectocide residues affect insect attraction to dung from treated cattle: implications for toxicity tests. Medical and Veterinary Entomology, 21: 312–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floate, K.D Gill, B.D. 1998. Seasonal activity of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) associated with cattle dung in southern Alberta and their geographic distribution in Canada. The Canadian Entomologist, 130: 131–151.Google Scholar
Floate, K.D. Wardhaugh, K.G. Boxall, A.B. Sherratt, T.N. 2005. Fecal residues of veterinary parasiticides: nontarget effects in the pasture environment. Annual Review of Entomology, 50: 153–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Floate, K.D. Bouchard, P. Holroyd, G. Poulin, R. Wellicome, T.I. 2008. Does doramectin use on cattle indirectly affect the endangered burrowing owl?. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 61: 543–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredeen, F.J.H. Glen, G.S. 1970. The survival and development of Leptocera caenosa (Diptera: Sphaeroceridae) in laboratory cultures. The Canadian Entomologist, 102: 164–171.Google Scholar
Freese, C.H. Aune, K.E. Boyd, D.P. Derr, J.N. Forrest, S.C. Cormack Gates, C., et al.  2007. Second chance for the plains bison. Biological Conservation, 136: 175–184.Google Scholar
Gordon, R.D. 1983. Studies on the genus Aphodius of the United States and Canada (Coleoptera: Scarbaeidae). VII. Food and habitat; distribution; key to eastern species. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 85: 633–652.Google Scholar
Greenham, P.M. 1972. The effects of the variability of cattle dung on the multiplication of the bushfly (Musca vetistissima Walk.). Journal of Animal Ecology, 41: 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornaday, W.T. 1889. The extermination of the American bison. From the Report of the National Museum, 1886–87. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. pp. 369–548.Google Scholar
Isenberg, A.C. 2000. The destruction of the bison: an environmental history, 1750–1920. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurence, B.R. 1954. The larval inhabitants of cow pats. Journal of Animal Ecology, 23: 234–260.Google Scholar
Lee, J.M. Peng, Y.-S. 1982. Influence of manure availability and nesting density on the progeny size of Onthophagus gazella. Environmental Entomology. 11: 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumaret, J.-P. Errouissi, F. Floate, K.D. Römbke, J. Wardhaugh, K.G. 2011. A review on the toxicity and non-target effects of macrocyclic lactones in terrestrial and aquatic environment. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. [In press].Google Scholar
Lysyk, T.J. Easton, E.R. Evenson, P.D. 1985. Seasonal changes in nitrogen and moisture content of cattle manure in cool-season pastures. Journal of Range Management, 38: 251–254.Google Scholar
Macqueen, A. Beirne, B.P. 1974. Insects and mites associated with fresh cattle dung in the southern interior of British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia, 71: 5–9.Google Scholar
Marsh, R. Campling, R.C. 1970. Fouling of pastures by dung. Herbage Abstracts, 40: 123–130.Google Scholar
Merritt, R.W. Anderson, J.R. 1977. The effects of different pasture and rangeland ecosystems on the annual dynamics of insects in cattle droppings. Hilgardia, 45: 31–71.Google Scholar
Meyer, J.A. Christensen, C.M. Knapp, F.W. 1978. The influence of various levels of ground ear corn and alfalfa hay in the bovine diet on the development of the face fly. Environmental Entomology, 7: 829–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohr, C.O. 1943. Cattle droppings as ecological units. Ecological Monographs, 13: 275–298.Google Scholar
Morgan, N.O. Graham, O.H. 1966. Influence of cattle diet on survival of horn fly larvae. Journal of Economic Entomology, 59: 835–837.Google Scholar
O'Hara, J.E. Floate, K.D. Cooper, B.E. 2000. The Sarcophagidae (Diptera) of cattle feedlots in southern Alberta. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 72: 167–176.Google Scholar
Peden, D.G. Dyne, G.M.V. Rice, R.W. Hansen, R.M. 1974. The trophic ecology of Bison bison L. on shortgrass plains. Journal of Applied Ecology, 11: 489–497.Google Scholar
Perotti, M.A. Lysyk, T.J. 2003. Novel growth media for rearing larval horn flies, Haematobia irritans (Diptera: Muscidae). Journal of Medical Entomology, 40: 22–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, H.F. 1958. A feedlot study of bison, cattalo and hereford calves. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 38: 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plumb, G.E. Dodd, J.L. 1993. Foraging ecology of bison and cattle on a mixed prairie: implications for natural area management. Ecological Applications, 3: 631–643.Google Scholar
Plumb, G.E. Dodd, J.L. 1994. Foraging ecology of bison and cattle. Rangelands, 16: 107–109.Google Scholar
Ratcliffe, B.C. 1991. The scarab beetles of Nebraska. Bulletin of the University of Nebraska State Museum, 12: 1–333.Google Scholar
Rice, W.R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43: 223–225.Google Scholar
Skidmore, P. 1991. Insects of the British cow-dung community. Richmond Publishing Co. Ltd., Slough, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Smetana, A. 1978. Revision of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae of America north of Mexico (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada. No. 110.Google Scholar
Soper, J.D. 1941. History, range, and home life of the northern bison. Ecological Monographs, 11: 347–412.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. 2011. Cattle inventories, by province (Canada) [online]. Available from http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/prim50a.htm. [accessed 3 March 2011].Google Scholar
United States Department of Agriculture [online]. Cattle. A.S.B. National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available from http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/Catt/Catt-07-22-2011.pdf [accessed 31 August 2011].Google Scholar
Valiela, I. 1969. An experimental study of the mortality factors of larval Musca autumnalis DeGeer. Ecological Monographs, 39: 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuren, D.V. Bray, M.P. 1983. Diets of bison and cattle on a seeded range in southern Utah. Journal of Range Management, 36: 499–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar