Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-10T10:44:25.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

INTRASPECIFIC AND INTERSPECIFIC BREEDING BEHAVIOR OF CHIRONOMUS PALLIDIVITTATUS (DIPTERA: CHIRONOMIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. Hein  and
J. C. Schmulbach
J. Hein
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion
J. C. Schmulbach
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A chironomid population found in a temporary pond in South Dakota and believed to be conspecific with the European Chironomus pallidivittatus was studied. Field and laboratory observations of intraspecific mating behavior are reported. The percentages of females producing viable eggs in crosses of C. pallidivittatus males with females of C. tentons and C. crassicaudatus were 6.2% and 6.3% respectively. In the reciprocal combinations, mating was difficult to induce and no viable eggs were produced. Neither the South Dakota population nor the European species called C. pallidivittatus conform to the morphology of the lectotype.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 103 , Issue 3 , March 1971 , pp. 458 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acton, A. B. 1957. Chromosome inversions in natural populations of Chironomus tentans. J. Genet. 55: 61–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acton, A. B. 1959. A study of the differences between widely separated populations of Chironomus (= Tendipes) tentans (Diptera). Proc. R. Soc. 151: 277–296.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. 1937. Cytogenetik. Fortschr. Zool. (N.F.) 2: 547–570.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. 1945. Chromosomen und Systematik bei Chironomiden. Arch. Hydrobiol. 40: 994–1008.Google Scholar
Bauer, H. and Beermann, W.. 1952. Die Polytänie der Riesenchromosomen. Chromosoma 4: 630–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beermann, W. 1953. Chromosomenpolymorphismus und Bastardierung zweier Chironornus-Arten. Zool. Anz. Suppl. 17: 290–295.Google Scholar
Beermann, W. 1955 a. Cytologische Analyse eines Camptochironomus Artbastards. I: Kreuzungsergebnisse und die Evolution des Karyotypus. Chrormosoma 7: 198–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beermann, W. 1955 b. Geschlechtsbestimmung und Evolution der genetischen Y-Chromosomen bei Chironomus. Biol. Zbl. 74: 525–544.Google Scholar
*Coe, R. L. 1950. Handbooks for the identification of British insects. Diptera, Nematocera, Vol. 9, pt. 2. London.Google Scholar
Edwards, F. W. 1929. British non-biting midges. Trans. ent. Soc. Lond. 77: 279–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossbach, U. 1968. Cell differentiation in the salivary glands of Camptochironomus tentans and C. pallidivittatus. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 5: 37–40.Google Scholar
Grossbach, U. 1969. Chromosomen-Aktivitaet und biochemische Zelldifferenzierung in den speicheldruesen von Camptochironomus. Chromosoma 28: 136–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Havinga, B. 1941. De veranderingen in den hydrographischen toestand en in de macrofauna van het IJsselmeer gedurende de jaren 1936–1940. Med. Zuiderzee-Commissie. Afl. 5: 1–26.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. and Townes, H. K.. 1952. Guide to the insects of Connecticut. VI: The Diptera or true flies., Fifth fascicle: midges and gnats., Tendipididae (Chironomidae). St. Conn. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull. 80.Google Scholar
Kalugina, N. S. 1963. The larva and pupa of Chironomus (Camptochironomus) pallidivittatus Mall. (Diptera, Chironomidae). Zool. Zh. 42: 624–627.Google Scholar
*Kruseman, G. 1935. 8e mededeeling over Tendipedidae. T. Entomolog. 78: S.LX–LXII.Google Scholar
*Kruseman, G. 1936. 10e mededelling over Tendipedidae. T. Entomolog. 79: S.LXXXIX–XC.Google Scholar
Malloch, J. R. 1915. The Chironomidae of Illinois. Bull. Ill. Lab. nat. Hist. 10: 275–543.Google Scholar
Nietzke, G. 1938. Die Kossau. Hydrobiologisch-faunistische Untersuchungen an schleswigholsteinischen Fliessgewässernn. Arch. Hydrobiol. 32: 1–74.Google Scholar
Palmèn, E. and Aho, L.. 1966. Studies on the ecology and phenology of the Chironomidae (Diptera) of the northern Baltic. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 3: 217–244.Google Scholar
Sadler, W. O. 1935. Biology of the midge Chironomus tentans Fabricius and methods for its propagation. Cornell. Univ. agric. Exp. Stn Mem. 173, 25 pp.Google Scholar
Shilova, A. I. 1957. Palearctic species of the subgenus Camptochironomus Kieff., genus Tnedipes Mg. (Diptera, Tendipedidae). Ent. Obozr. 36: 224–230.Google Scholar
Steffan, A. W. 1966. Zur Bedeutung der Chromosomen-Forschung für die Systematik der Chironomidae (Diptera). Gewass. Abwäss. 41/42: 22–37.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. 1954. Chironomus. Leben, Verbreitung und wirtschaftliche Bedeutung der Chironomiden. Binnengewässer 20: 1–834.Google Scholar
Wülker, W. 1963. Parasitologische und biochemische Verwandschaft in der gattung Chironomus (Dipt.). Naturwissenschaften 49/50: 1–3.Google Scholar