Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-npwhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T14:35:04.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of Flight and Attack Activity of the Ambrosia Beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), and other Scolytids1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. A. Chapman  and
J. M. Kinghorn
J. A. Chapman
Affiliation:
Forest Biology Laboratory, Victoria, B.C.
J. M. Kinghorn
Affiliation:
Forest Biology Laboratory, Victoria, B.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The flight habits of any scolytid beetle are an important aspect of its biology, and times of flight should be known for effective chemical protection of logs against its attacks. Consequently, during the course of biological and chemical control investigations of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), from 1954 through 1956, much attention was directed to a study of its flight activity. This species is well known to attack early in the spring. There are other attack flights later in the season but far fewer beetles are involved then. The beetles also fly at the time they leave the brood logs to enter forest litter, where they overwinter. Several methods were used to study the influence of weather, season, and other factors on flights of Trypodendron and, to a lesser extent, of other scolytids. These methods and some of the data secured are described and discussed in this paper.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 90 , Issue 6 , June 1958 , pp. 362 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balachowsky, A. 1949. Coléoptères Scolytides. Faune de France 50. Lechevalier, Paris.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1955. Window flight traps for insects. Can. Ent. 87: 46–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, S. W. 1953. Response of insects to black and white light. J. Econ. Ent. 42: 376–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadorn, C. 1933. Recherches sur la morphologie, les stades évolutifs et l'hivernage du bostryche liseré (Xyloterus lineatus Oliv.). No. 11 Suppl. org. Soc. forest. suisse, Bern.Google Scholar
Hoffman, C. H., Townes, H. K., Swift, H. H. and Sailer, R. I.. 1949. Field studies on the effects of airplane applications of DDT on forest invertebrates. Ecol. Mono. 19: 3–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. G. and Taylor, L. R.. 1955. The measurement of insect density in the air. Lab. Practice 4: 187–192; 235–239.Google Scholar
Moeriche, V. 1955. Über das Verhalten phytophager Insekten während des Befallsflugs unter dem Einfluss von weissen Flächen. Zeit. Pflanzenkrank. u. Pflanzenschutz 62: 588–593.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. J. 1956. Insects other than Lepidoptera at a mercury-vapour light trap. Ent. Mon. Mag. 92: 19.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1953. A manual of entomological techniques. Edwards Bros., Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Rice, P. L. 1933. Insects collected in flight traps in the vicinity of Moscow, Idaho. J. Econ. Ent. 26: 1079–1083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rüschkamp, P. F. 1927. Der Flugapparat der Käfer. Vorbedingung, Ursache und Verlauf seiner Rückbildung. Zoologica 75: 1–88.Google Scholar
Turner, J. A. 1953. Intense drying periods over the southern coast of British Columbia. Canada, Dept. of Transport, Meteorological Division, Circular 2316. (Processed).Google Scholar
Wakeland, C. 1934. Flight studies of Bruchus pisorum L. (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). J. Econ. Ent. 27: 534–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar