Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-kg7gq Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-11-04T08:01:08.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Attack by the Ambrosia Beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) on Log Attractiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

J. A. Chapman
J. A. Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of Forestry of Canada, Regional Laboratory, Victoria, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of attack by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Olivier) on log attractiveness was studied using "greenhouse" cages, in which solar heating causes release of odor-bearing air beneath glass-barrier traps. In all eight replicates of a test, attack by female beetles was followed by a marked increase in attractiveness of logs. This "secondary" attraction was strong within 2–3 days after attack, continued for many weeks if females remained alone, but disappeared following mating.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 98 , Issue 1 , January 1966 , pp. 50 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chapman, J. A. 1958. Studies on the physiology of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron, in relation to its ecology. Proc. Tenth Int. Congr. Ent. 4: 375–380.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1959. Forced attacks by the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron. Canad. Dept. Agr., For. Biol. Div., Bi-Mon. Prog. Rep. 15(5): 3.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1962. Field studies on attack flight and log selection by the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canad. Ent. 94: 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1963. Field selection of different log odors by scolytid beetles. Canad. Ent. 95: 673–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A. 1964. Evidence for a sex attractant in the elaterid beetle, Hemicrepidius morio (LeConte). Canad. Ent. 96: 909–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, J. A., and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1958. Studies of flight and attack activity of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.), and other scolytids. Canad. Ent. 90: 362–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, E. D. A., and Chapman, J. A.. 1965. Flight and attack of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) in relation to felling date of logs. Canad. Ent. 97: 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, E. D. A., and Kinghorn, J. M.. 1961. Factors influencing the distribution of over-wintering ambrosia beetles, Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.). Canad. Ent. 93: 746–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gara, R. I. 1963. Studies on the flight behavior of Ips confusus (Lec.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) in response to attractive material. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 51–66.Google Scholar
Goeden, R. D., and Norris, D. M. Jr., 1964. Attraction of Scolytus quadrispinosus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to Carya spp. for oviposition. Ann. ent. Soc. Amer. 57: 141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, K. 1959. Release by flight exercise of a chemotropic response from photopositive domination in a scolytid beetle. Nature 184: 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinghorn, J. M. 1957. Two practical methods of identifying types of ambrosia beetle damage. J. econ. Ent. 50: 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kliefoth, R. A., Vité, J. P. and Pitman, G. B.. 1964. A laboratory technique for testing bark beetle attractants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 283–290.Google Scholar
McMullen, L. H., and Atkins, M. D.. 1962. On the flight and host selection of the Douglasfir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Canad. Ent. 94: 1309–1325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitman, G. B., and Vité, J. P.. 1963. Studies on the pheromone of Ips confusus (Lec.). I. Secondary sexual dimorphism in the hindgut epithelium. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 221–225.Google Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1958. The behaviour of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopk., during mating, egg laying, and gallery construction. Canad. Ent. 90: 505–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1963. Response of Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins to volatile attractants. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 23–38.Google Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Daterman, G. E.. 1964a. Response of the ambrosia beetle Trypodendron lineatum (Oliv.) to a female-produced pheromone. Z. angew. Ent. 54: 300–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A., and Daterman, G. E.. 1964b. Field studies on flight patterns and olfactory responses of ambrosia beetles in Douglas-fir forests of Western Oregon. Canad. Ent. 96: 1339–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1961. A field method for observation on olfactory responses of bark beetles (Scolytidae) to volatile materials. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 175–182.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., and Gara, R. I.. 1962. Volatile attractants from ponderosa pine attacked by bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolvtidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 21: 251–274.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I. and Kliefoth, R. A.. 1963. Collection and bioassay of a volatile fraction attractive to Ips confusus (Lec.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 39–50.Google Scholar
Vité, J. P., Gara, R. I. and von Scheller, H. D.. 1964. Field observations on the response to attractants of bark beetles infesting southern pines. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22: 461–470.Google Scholar
Wood, D. L. 1962. The attraction created by males of a bark beetle Ips confusus (LeConte) attacking ponderosa pine. Pan-Pacif. Ent. 38: 141–145.Google Scholar