Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-9h5t2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-03T15:40:04.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE CHORIONIC ARCHITECTURE AND SHELL STRUCTURE OF AMATHES C-NIGRUM (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

E. H. Salkeld
E. H. Salkeld
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute, Canada Department of Agriculture, Ottawa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The chorionic architecture including the general and fine structure of the various shell layers and specialized areas in the newly-laid egg of Amathes c-nigrum (L.) is described. The chorion is, primarily, two-layered. The lamellate outer layer, comprising the main bulk of the shell, appears to be very porous over the ventral surface of the egg but much more solid over the lateral and upper surfaces. Here it is traversed by aeropylar canals which convey air to the inner layer. The trabecular inner layer completely surrounds the yolk except in the micropylar area. The micropyles protrude from the inner side of the chorion to form entomicropylar tubes which project towards the yolk. Each is enclosed by thickened vitelline membrane.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cruickshank, W. J. 1972. Ultrastructural modifications in the follicle cells and egg membranes during development of flour moth oocytes. J. Insect Physiol. 18: 485–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, W. A. L. 1959. The systemic insecticidal action of paraoxon on the eggs of Pieris brassicae (L.). J. Insect Physiol. 3: 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delachambre, J. 1970. Etudes sur l'epicuticule des insectes. 1. Le développement de l'épicuticle chez l'adulte de Tenebrio molitor L. Z. Zellforsch. 108: 380–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, E. 1955. Zur Morphologie du Schmetterlingseier. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
Gerrity, R. G., Rempel, J. G., Sweeny, P. R., and Church, N. S.. 1967. The embryology of Lytta viridana Le Conte (Coleoptera: Meloidae). 11. The structure of the vitelline membrane. Can. J. Zool. 45: 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardwick, D. F. 1958. Taxonomy, life history, and habits of the elliptoid-eyed species of Schinia (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with notes on the Heliothidinae. Can. Ent. Suppl. 6.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E. 1962. The fine structure and biology of the egg-shell of the wheat bulb fly, Leptohylemyia coarctata. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 103: 243–251.Google Scholar
Hinton, H. E. 1969. Respiratory systems of insect egg shells. A. Rev. Ent. 14: 343–368.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinton, H. E. 1971. Polyphyletic evolution of respiratory systems of eggshells, with a discussion of structure and density-independent and density-dependent selective pressures. In Heywood, V. H. (Ed.), Scanning electron microscopy. The Systematics Assoc. Spec. Vol. 4. Academic Press, London and New York.Google Scholar
King, R. C. and Koch, E. A.. 1963. Studies on the ovarian follicle cells of Drosophila. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 104: 297–320.Google Scholar
Locke, M. 1961. Pore canals and related structures in insect cuticle. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 10: 589–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, M. 1965. Permeability of insect cuticle to water and lipids. Science 147: 295–298.Google Scholar
Narbel, M. 1946. La cytologic de la parthénogénèse chez Apterona helix Sieb. (Lep. Psychides). Annls Soc. zool. Suisse 53: 625–681.Google Scholar
Neville, A. C., Thomas, M. G., and Zelazny, B.. 1969. Pore canal shape related to molecular architecture of arthropod cuticle. Tissue and Cell 1: 183–200.Google Scholar
Peterson, A. 1964. Egg types among moths of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). Fla Ent. 47: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, E. S. 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. cell. Biol. 17: 208–211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkeld, E. H. and Potter, C.. 1953. The effect of the age and stage of development of insect eggs on their resistance to insecticides. Bull. ent. Res. 44: 527–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seamans, H. L. 1933 (unpub.). A preliminary study of the chorion design in the micropyle area of noctuid eggs. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Saskatchewan.Google Scholar
Slifer, E. H. 1958. Diapause in the eggs of Melanoplus differentialis (Orthoptera, Acrididae). J. exp. Zool. 138: 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H. and Sekhon, J. J.. 1963. The fine structure of the membranes which cover the egg of the grasshopper, Melanoplus differentialis with special reference to the hydropyle. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. 104: 321–334.Google Scholar
Smith, D. S., Telfer, W. H., and Neville, A. C.. 1971. Fine structure of the chorion of a moth, Hyalophora cecropia. Tissue and Cell 3: 477–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Syme, P. D. 1961 (unpub.). The morphology of lepidopterous eggs with descriptions of two hundred and forty-eight species. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Telfer, W. H. and Smith, D. S.. 1970. Aspects of egg formation. In Neville, A. C. (Ed.), Insect ultrastructure. R. ent. Soc. Symp. 5. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford and Edinburgh.Google Scholar