Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-kmmxp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T06:54:05.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Palaeoart and Archaeological Myths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Robert G. Bednarik
Robert G. Bednarik
Affiliation:
International Federation of Rock Art Organizations(IFRAO) P.O. Box 216 Caulfield South Victoria 3162, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article addresses the question of human symbolic behaviour in the Lower and Middle Palaeolithic. Bednarik argues that the case against such early symbolic behaviour usually relies on untestable propositions about the stages of human cognitive development, and that too little attention has been paid to the full range of evidence for Lower and Middle Palaeolithic symbolism. He urges that the same criteria should be applied in assessing this evidence as in assessing the more widely accepted evidence for Upper Palaeolithic symbolism. In their following reply, Chase & Dibble observe that many quite reasonable hypotheses in the historical behavioural sciences cannot be refuted absolutely, and that where competing hypotheses are presented it may be difficult to decide which is most probable. Finally Davidson, also replying to Bednarik's criticisms, concludes that their different views of the evidence for early hominid symbolic behaviour arise from different objectives and conventions of understanding

Type
Articles
Information
Cambridge Archaeological Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , April 1992 , pp. 27 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © The McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agrawal, D. P., &Kusumgar, S., 1974. Prehistoric Chronology and Radiocarbon Dating in India. New Delhi: Prabhat PrakashanGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 1984. Pyrenean Prehistory. Warminster: Aris & PhillipsGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P.G., 1987. Excavation of a palaeolithic plank from Japan. Nature 329,110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahn, P.G., &Vertut, J., 1988. Images of the Ice Age. Leicester: Windward/ New York: Facts on FileGoogle Scholar
Barandiarán, J.M.de, 1980. Excavaciones en Axlor (Campaña de 1969), in Obras Completas XVII, 129–384Google Scholar
Beaumont, P., & Boshier, A., 1972. Mining in southern Africa and the emergence of modern man. Optima, March 1972Google Scholar
Beaumont, P., De Villiers, H., & Vogel, J., 1978. Modern man in sub-Saharan Africa prior to 49,000 BP: a review and evaluation with particular reference toBorderCave.South African Journal of Science74, 409–19Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1984a. Review of V.S. Wakankar, The oldest works of art?' Rock Art Research 1, 51–2Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1984b. Die Bedeutung der paläolithischen Fingerlinientradition. Anthropologie 23, 73–9Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1985. Parietal finger markings in Australia. Bollettino del Centro Camuno di Studi Preistorici 22,83–8Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1986a. Parietal finger markings in Europe and Australia. Rock Art Research 3, 30–61, 159–70Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1986b. Cave use by Australian Pleistocene man. Proceedings of the University of Bristol Spelaeological Society 17, 227–45Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1987. Engramme und Phosphene. Zeitschrift für Ethnologie 112, 223–35Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1988a. ‘Artorigins’. Paper presented at Symposium K, First AURA Congress, DarwinGoogle Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1988b. Comment on D. Mania & U. Mania, ‘Deliberate engravings on bone artefacts of Homo erectus’. Rock Art Research 5, 96–100Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1990a. On the cognitive development of hominids. Man and Environment 15, 1–7Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1990b. More to Palaeolithic females than meets the eye. Rock Art Research 7, 133–7Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1990c. An Acheulian haematite pebble with striations. Rock Art Research 7, 75Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1990d. About Pleistocene chert mining. Sahara 3, 113–15Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1991a. Natural line markings on Palaeolithic objects. Anthropologie 29Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1991b. The Palaeolithic art of Asia (in Chinese). FossilsGoogle Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1991c. On natural cave markings. Helictite 29Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1992a. Developments in rock art dating. Acta Archaeologica 63Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., 1992b. Microerosion dating of petroglyphs at Lake Onega, U.S.S.R. (in Russian) Sovetskaja Archeologia (in press)Google Scholar
Bednarik, R.G., (in press). Epistemology in palaeoart studies. Origini 15Google Scholar
Belitzky, S., Goren-Inbar, N., & Werker, E., 1991. A Middle Pleistocene wooden plank with manmade polish. Journal of Human Evolution 20, 349– 53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bordes, F., 1969. Os percé moustérien et os gravé acheuléen du Pech de l'Azé II. Quaternaria 11, 1–5Google Scholar
Brook, D., 1985. Comment on D. Groenfeldt, ‘The interpretation of prehistoric art’. Rock Art Research 2, 34–5Google Scholar
Byrne, R.W., & Whiten, A., (eds) 1988. Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intelligence in Monkeys, Apes, and Man. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Capitan, L., & Peyrony, D., 1912. Station préhistorique de la Ferrassie, commune de Savignac-du-Bugue (Dordogne). Revue Anthropologiaue 22, 76–99Google Scholar
Capitan, L., &Peyrony, D., 1921. Les origines de l'art à l'Aurignacien moyen: La Ferrassie. Revue Archéologiaue 31, 92–112Google Scholar
Chase, P.G. &Dibble, H.L., 1987. Middle Paleolithic symbolism: a review of current evidence and interpretations. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 6, 263–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J.D., 1988. The Middle Stone Age of East Africa and the beginnings of regional identity. Journal of World Archaeology 2, 235–305Google Scholar
Combier, J., 1984. Grotte de la Tête-du-Lion, in L'Art des Cavernes. Paris: Ministère de la Culture, 595–9Google Scholar
Davidson, I., 1990. Bilzingsleben and early marking. Rock Art Research 7, 52–6Google Scholar
Davidson, I., &Noble, W., 1989. The archaeology of perception: traces of depiction and language. Current Anthropology 30, 125–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, I., &Noble, W., 1990. Tools, humans and evolution: the relevanceof the Upper Palaeolithic. Paper presented at the symposium ‘Tools, language and intelligence: evolutionary implications’, Cascais, PortugalGoogle Scholar
Davis, S.J.M., 1974. Incised bones from the Mousterian of Kebara Cave (Mount Carmel) and the Aurignacian of Ha-yonim (Western Galilee), Israel. Paléorient 2, 181–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoer, W.R., 1990. Interaction, imitation, and communication as expressed in style: the Ucayali experience, in The Uses of Style in Archaeology, eds. Conkey, M. W. & Hastorf, C. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 82–104Google Scholar
D'Errico, F., Gaillard, C., & Misra, V.N., 1989. Collection of non-utilitarian objects by Homo erectus in India. Hotninidae. Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Human Paleontology. Milan: Editoriale Jaca Book, 237–9Google Scholar
DeWaal, F., 1982. Chimpanzee Politics. London: Jonathan CapeGoogle Scholar
Dupree, L., 1972. Tentative conclusions and tentative chronological charts, in Prehistoric research in Afghanistan (1959–1966), ed. Dupree, L.. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 62, 74–82Google Scholar
Freeman, L.G., & Gonzalez, Echegaray J., 1983. Tallymarked bone from Mousterian levels at Cueva Morín (Santander, Spain), in Homenaje al Prof. M. Almagro Bosch, Vol. I. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura, 143–7Google Scholar
Frolov, B.A., 1981. L'art paléolithique: préhistoire de la science? in Arte Paleolitíco, Comisión XI, 10th Congress UISPP, Mexico City, 60–81Google Scholar
Gábori-Csánk, V., 1988. Une mine de silex paléolithique à Budapest, Hongrie, in Upper Pleistocene Prehistory of Western Eurasia, eds. Dibble, H.L. & Montet-White, A.. Philadelphia: University Museum, University of Pennsylvania, Monograph 54, 141–3Google Scholar
Gallus, A., 1971. Results of the exploration of Koonalda Cave, 1956–1968, in Archaeology of the Gallus site, Koonalda Cave, ed. Wright, R.V.S.. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 87–133Google Scholar
Gallus, A., 1986. Comment on R.G. Bednarik, ‘Parietal finger markings in Europe and Australia’. Rock Art Research 3,56–9Google Scholar
Gautier, A., 1986. Une histoire de dents: les soi-disant incisives travaillées du Paléolithique moyen de Sclayn. Helinium 26, 177–81Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N., 1986. A figurine from the Acheulian site of Berekhat Ram. Mi‘Tekufat Ha’Even 19, 7–12Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N., 1990. Quneitra: a Mousterian site on the Golan Heights. Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology, Monograph 31Google Scholar
Goren-Inbar, N., Lewy, Z., & Kislev, M.E., 1991. The taphonomy of a bead-like fossil from the Acheulian of Gesher Benot Yáaqov, Israel. Rock Art Research 8, 83–7Google Scholar
Gruet, M., 1955. Le gisement moustérien d'El Guettar (Tunisie). Quaternaria 2, 53–68Google Scholar
Gruet, M., 1959. Amoncellement pyramidal de sphères calcaires dans une source fossile moustérienne à El-Guettar (Sud Tunisien). Actes du 2e Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire, Alger, 449–56Google Scholar
Hahn, J., 1990. Höhlenkunst aus dem Hohlen Fels bei Schelklingen, Alb-Donau-Kreis. Archäologische Ausgrabungen in Baden-Württemberg 10, 19–22Google Scholar
Handwerker, W.P., 1989. The origins and evolution of culture. American Anthropologist 91, 313–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henri-Martin, G., 1947. Un disque en calcaire dans le gisement Mousterien de la Quina. Société Préhistorique Francaise 44, 1–4Google Scholar
Hernández, Pérez M.S., Ferrer, I., Marset, P., & Catalá, Ferrer E., 1988. Arte Rupestre en Alicante. Alicante: Gráficas EstiloGoogle Scholar
Howell, F.C., 1966. Observations on the earlier phases of the European Lower Palaeolithic. American Anthropologist 68, 88–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huyge, D., 1990. Mousterian skiffle? Note on a Middle Palaeolithic engraved bone from Schulen, Belgium. Rock Art Research 7, 125–32Google Scholar
Inskeep, R., 1962. The age of the Kondoa rock paintings in the light of recent excavations at Kisese II rock shelter. Actes du IV Congrès Panafricain de Préhistoire et de l'étude du Quaternaire, 249–56Google Scholar
Jelinek, J., 1988. Considérations sur l'art Paléolithique mobilier de l'Europe centrale. L'Anthropologie 92, 203–38Google Scholar
Jones, R., (ed) 1985. Archaeological Research in Kakadu National Park. Canberra: Australian National Parks and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
Jullien, R., 1965. Les Hommes Fossiles de la Pierre Taillée. Paris: BoubéeGoogle Scholar
Keeley, L.H., 1977. The function of Palaeolithic flint tools. Scientific American 237, 108–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, K., 1978. Preliminary analysis of the mammalian fauna from the Redcliff Stone Age cave site, Rhodesia. Occasional Papers, National Museum of Southern Rhodesia A4(2), 74–80Google Scholar
Klein, R.G., 1973. Ice Agehunters of the Ukraine. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Kumar, G., Narvare, G., & Pancholi, R., 1988. Engraved ostrich eggshell objects: new evidence of Upper Palaeolithic art in India. Rock Art Research 5, 43–53Google Scholar
Leakey, L.S.B., 1958. Recent discoveries at Olduvai Gorge, Tanganyika. Nature 19, 1099–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, M.D., 1971. Olduvai Gorge, Vol. 3: Excavations in Beds I and II, 1960–1963. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Leonardi, P., 1988. Art paléolithique mobilier et pariétal en Italie. L'Anthropologie 92, 139–202Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1961. Les fouilles d'Arcy-sur-Cure (Yonne). Gallia Prehistoire 4, 3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1967. Treasures of Prehistoric Art. New York: AbramsGoogle Scholar
Lewis-Williams, J.D. &Dowson, T.A., 1988. The signs of all times: entoptic phenomena in Upper Palaeolithic art. Current Anthropology 29, 201–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindly, J.M., & Clark, G.A., 1990. Symbolism and modern human origins. Current Anthropology 31, 233–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorblanchet, M., Labeau, M., Vernet, J.L., Fitte, P., Valladas, H., Cachier, H., & Arnold, M., 1990. Palaeolithic pigments in the Quercy, France. Rock Art Research 7, 4–20Google Scholar
Loy, T.H., Jones, R., Nelson, E., Meehan, B., Vogel, J., Southon, J., & Cosgrove, R., 1990. Accelerator radiocarbon dating of human blood proteins in pigments from Late Pleistocene art sites in Australia. Antiquity 64, 110–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lumley, H. de, 1966. Les fouilles de Terra Amata, Nice. Premiers résultats. Bulletin du Musée d'Anthropologie Préhistorique de Monaco 13, 29–51Google Scholar
Mania, D., & Mania, U., 1988. Deliberate engravings on bone artefacts of Homoerectus. Rock Art Research 5, 91–107Google Scholar
Marshack, A., 1976. Some implications of the Paleolithic symbolic evidence for the origin of language. Current Anthropology 17, 274–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1981. On Paleolithic ochre and the early uses of color and symbol. Current Anthropology 22, 188–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1986. Microscopic analysis of seeming intentional Mousterian engravings. Paper presented to the Colloque International sur l'Homme du Néandertal, Liège, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
Marshack, A., 1991. A reply to Davidson on Mania & Mania. Rock Art Research 8, 47–58Google Scholar
Martin, H., 1907–10. Recherches sur I'Evolution du Moustérien dans le Gisement de la Quina (Charente). Industrie Osseuse, Vol. 1. Paris: Schleicher FrèresGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J., Officer, K., Jull, T., Donahue, D., Head, J. & Ford, B., 1990. Investigating 14CAMS: dating prehistoric rock art in the Sydney Sandstone Basin, Australia. Rock Art Research 7, 83–92Google Scholar
Misra, V.D., 1977. Some Aspects of Indian Archaeology. Allahabad: Prabhat PrakashanGoogle Scholar
Morwood, M., 1989. The archaeology of Aboriginal art in S.E. Cape York: preliminary report on the 1989 fieldwork. Rock Art Research 6, 155–6Google Scholar
Mottl, M., 1951. Die Repolust-Höhle bei Peggau (Steiermark) und ihre eiszeitlichen Bewohner. Archaeologica Austriaca 8, 1–78Google Scholar
Munn, N.D., 1973. Walbiri Iconography. Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Muzzolini, A., 1990. The sheep in Saharan rock art. Rock Art Research 7, 93–109Google Scholar
Narr, K.J., 1951. Alt-und mittelpaläolithische Funde aus rheinischen Freilandstationen. Banner Jahrbuch 151, 5–47Google Scholar
Narr, K.J., 1966. Handbuch der Urgeschichte. Vol. 1: Ältere und mittlere Steinzeit. Berne & Munich: Francke VerlagGoogle Scholar
Nobbs, M.F. & Dorn, R.I., 1988. Age determinations for rock varnish formation within petroglyphs: cation-ratio dating of 24 motifs from the Olary region, South Australia. Rock Art Research 5, 108–46Google Scholar
Noble, W., & Davidson, I., 1991. The evolutionary emergence of modern human behaviour: language and its archaeology. Man 26, 223–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, K.P., 1981. Emergence of higher thought, 3.0-0.2 Ma BP. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B292, 205–11Google Scholar
Pei, W.C., 1931. Notice of the discovery of quartz and other stone artifacts in the Lower Pleistocene hominid-bearing sediments of the Choukoutien Cave deposits. Bulletin of the Geological Society of China 11, 109–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyrony, D., 1934. La Ferrassie. Préhistoire 3, 1–92Google Scholar
Roberts, R.G., Jones, R., & Smith, M.A., 1990. Thermoluminescence dating of a 50,000-year-old human occupation site in northern Australia. Nature 345, 153–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenfeld, A., Horton, D., & Winter, J., 1981. Early Man in North Queensland. Terra Australis 6. Canberra: Australian National UniversityGoogle Scholar
Seyfarth, R.M., Cheney, D.L., & Marler, P., 1980. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210, 801–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singer, R., & Wymer, J., 1982. The Middle Stone Age at Klasies River Mouth in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Solecki, R., 1975. The Middle Palaeolithic site of Nahr Ibrahim (Asfurieh Cave) in Lebanon, in Problems in Prehistory: North Africa and the Levant, eds. Wendorf, F. & Marks, A.. Dallas: Southern Methodist University Press, 283–95Google Scholar
Tangri, D., 1989. !Science, hypothesis testing and prehistoric pictures. Rock Art Research 6, 83–95Google Scholar
Tode, A., 1953. Einige archäologische Erkenntnisse aus der paläolithischen Freilandstation von Salzgitter-Lebenstedt. Eiszeitalter und Gegenwart 3, 192–215Google Scholar
Valoch, K., 1987. The Early Palaeolithic site Stránská skála I near Brno (Czechoslovakia). Anthropologie 25, 125–42Google Scholar
Vandermeersch, B., 1981. Les Hommes Fossiles de Qafzeh (Israël). Paris: CNRSGoogle Scholar
Vermeersch, P.M., Paulissen, E., & Van Peer, P., 1989. Palaeolithic chert quarries and mines in Egypt. Sahara 2, 95–8Google Scholar
Vértes, L., 1964. Tata: eine mittelpaläolithische Travertin Siedlungin Ungarn. Budapest: Akadémiai KiadóGoogle Scholar
Vértes, L., 1965. Az öskökor és az átmeneti kökor emlékei Magyarországon. Budapest: Akadémiai KiadóGoogle Scholar
Vincent, A., 1988. L'oscomme artefact au Paléolithique moyen: principes d'étude et premiers résultats, in L'Homme de Néandertal, Vol.4: La Technique (Etudes et Recherches Archéologiques de l'Université de Liège 31), ed. Otte, M., 185–96Google Scholar
Volman, T., 1984. Early prehistory of southern Africa, in Southern African prehistory and palaeoenvironments, ed. Klein, R.. Rotterdam: Balkema, 169–220Google Scholar
Wakankar, V.S., 1988. Comment on G. Kumar, G. Narvare & R. Pancholi, ‘Engraved ostrich eggshell objects: new evidence of Upper Palaeolithic art in India’. Rock Art Research 5, 51Google Scholar
Walker, N.J., 1987. The dating of Zimbabwean rock art. Rock Art Research 4, 137–49Google Scholar
Wendt, W.E., 1974. Art mobilier aus der Apollo 11 Grotte in Südwest-Afrika. Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica 5, 1–42Google Scholar
White, R., 1989. Visual thinking in the Ice Age. Scientific American 261, 92–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar