Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-c8jtx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-24T15:24:15.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trust, Morality and International Business

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

George G. Brenkert
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper argues that trust is one of the crucial bases for an international business morality. To defend this claim, it identifies three prominent senses of trust in the current literature and defends one of them, viz., what I term the “Attitudinal view.” Three different contexts in which such trust plays a role in business relationships are then described, as well as the conditions for the specific kinds of Attitudinal trust which appear in those contexts. Difficulties for the international development of these forms of trust are briefly characterized and some of the possible responses are noted. Finally, the paper identifies morally important features of trust and some of their implications for an international business morality.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Business Ethics Quarterly , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , April 1998 , pp. 293 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Business Ethics 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arrighetti, A., Bachmann, R., Deakin, S. 1997. ‘Contract Law, Social Norms and Inter-firm Cooperation.’ Cambridge Journal of Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Baier, A. 1985. Postures of the Mind. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Baier, A. 1986. ‘Trust and Antitrust.’ Ethics, 96: 231–260.Google Scholar
Baier, A. 1995. Moral Prejudices. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B. and Hansen, M. H. 1994. ‘Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage.’ Strategic Management Journal, 15: 175–190.Google Scholar
Bluhm, L. H. 1987. ‘Trust, Terrorism, and Technology.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 6: 333–341.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Brenkert, G. 1994. ‘The Importance of the Structural Features of Moral Systems for International Business Ethics.’ Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Association For Business and Society, pp. 101–106.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. 1988. ‘Trust as a Commodity.’ In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeGeorge, R. 1993. Competing With Integrity In International Business. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deutsch, M. 1958. ‘Trust and Suspicion.’ Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2: 265–279.Google Scholar
Dodgson, M. 1993. ‘Learning, Trust and Technological Collaboration.’ Human Relations, 46: 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T. W. 1994. ‘Towards A Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory.’ Academy of Management Review, 19(2): 252–284.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and The Creation of Prosperity. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gabarro, J. J. 1978. ‘The Development of Trust, Influence and Expectations.’ Interpersonal Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. 1988. ‘Can We Trust Trust?’ In Gambetta, D. D. (ed.), Trust. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gellner, E. 1988. ‘Trust, Cohesion and the Social Order.’ In Gambetta, D. (ed.), Trust. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. 1982. ‘Human Rights and the Prevention of Cancer.’ In Gewirth, A., (ed.), Human Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Held, V. 1968. ‘On the Meaning of Trust.’ Ethics, 78: 15–159.Google Scholar
Held, V. 1984. Rights and Goods. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1979. ‘Value Systems in Forty Countries: Interpretation Validation and Consequences for Theory.’ In Eckensberger, L. H.Lonner, W. J., and Poortinga, Y. H. (eds.), Cross-Cultural Contributions to Psychology. Lisse: Swes & Zeiliner B. V., pp. 389–407.Google Scholar
Horng, C. 1993. ‘Cultural Differences, Trust and Their Relationships to Business Strategy and Control.’ Advances in International Comparative Management, 8: 175–197.Google Scholar
Horsburgh, H. J. N. 1960. ‘The Ethics of Trust.’ Philosophical Quarterly, 10: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hosmer, L. T. 1995. ‘Trust: The Connecting Link Between Organizational Theory and Philosophical Ethics.’ Academy of Management Review, 20: 379–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, T. M. 1995. ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics.’ Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.Google Scholar
King, J. B 1988. ‘Prisoner’s Paradoxes.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 7: 475–487.Google Scholar
Liebrand, W. B. G., Jansen, R. W. T. L., Rijken, V. M. and Suhre, C. J. M. 1986. ‘Might Over Morality: Social Values and the Perception of Other Players in Experimental Games.’ Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22: 203–215.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1979. Trust and Power. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Markels, A., Lublin, J. S. and Kuntz, P. 1996. ‘Why Executives Tour World with Politicians.’ The Wall Street Journal, April 4: B1.Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. and Schoorman, F. D. 1995. “An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust,” Academy of Management Review 20(3): 709–734.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., Bloom, S., Boldizar, J. P. and Samuelson, C. D. 1985. ‘Why We Are Fairer than Others.’ Journal of Business Ethics, 9: 619–638.Google Scholar
Noreen, E. 1988. ‘The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory.’ Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13: 359–369.Google Scholar
Puffer, S. M. and McCarthy, D. J. 1995. ‘Finding the Common Ground in Russian and American Business Ethics.’ California Management Review, 37: 29–46.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sable, C. F. 1993. ‘Studied Trust: Building New Forms of Cooperation in a Volatile Economy.’ Human Relations, 9: 1133–1170.Google Scholar
Sako, M. 1991. ‘The Role of “Trust” in Japanese Buyer-Supplier Relationships.’ Ricerche Economiche, 45: 449–474.Google Scholar
Sako, M. 1992. Prices, quality and trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. 1990. ‘Promises and Practices.’ Philosophy & Public Affairs, 19: 199–226.Google Scholar
Sellerberg, A.-M. 1982. ‘On Modern Confidence.’ Acta Sociologica, 25: 39–48.Google Scholar
Shell, G. R. 1991. ‘Opportunism and Trust in the Negotiation of Commercial Contracts: Toward a New Cause of Action.’ Vanderbilt Law Review, 44: 221–282.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. C. 1992. Ethics and Excellence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, D. O. 1978. ‘The Duty to Trust.’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 79: 89–101.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. 1989. Living Morally. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Tullock, G. 1967. ‘The Prisoner’s Dilemma and Mutual Trust.’ Ethics, 77: 229–235.Google Scholar
Zucker, L. 1986. ‘Production of Trust: Institutional Sources of Economic Structure, 1840–1920.’ Research in Organizational Behavior, 8: 53–111.Google Scholar