Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-13T22:26:33.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subnormality conditions in non-torsion groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

Luise-Charlotte Kappe  and
Gunnar Traustason
Luise-Charlotte Kappe
Affiliation:
SUNY at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, United States of America e-mail: menger@math.binghamton.edu
Gunnar Traustason
Affiliation:
University of BathBath BA2 7AY, England e-mail: masgt@maths.bath.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

According to results of Heineken and Stadelmann, a non-torsion group is a 2-Baer group if and only if it is 2-Engel, and it has all subgroups 2-subnormal if and only if it is nilpotent of class 2. We extend some of these results to values of n greater than 2. Any non-torsion group which is an n-Baer group is an n-Engel group. The converse holds for n = 3, and for all n in the case of metabelian groups. A non-torsion group without involutions having all subgroups 3-subnormal has nilpotency class 4, and this bound is sharp.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 59 , Issue 3 , June 1999 , pp. 459 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1999

References

[1]Baer, R., ‘Situation der Untergruppen und Struktur der Gruppe’, S.B. Heidelberg Akad. Math. Nat. Klasse 2 (1933), 12–17.Google Scholar
[2]Dedekind, R., ‘Über Gruppen, deren sämtliche Theiler Normaltheiler sind’, Math. Ann. 48 (1897), 548–561.Google Scholar
[3]Garrison, D.J. and Kappe, L.-C., ‘Metabelian groups with all cyclic subgroups subnormal of bounded defect’, in Proceedings of Infinite Groups 1994 (Walter de Gruyter, 1996), pp. 73–85.Google Scholar
[4]Heineken, H., ‘Engelsche Elemente der Länge drei’, Illinois J. Math. 5 (1961), 681–707.Google Scholar
[5]Heineken, H., ‘A class of three-Engel groups’, J. Algebra 17 (1971), 341–345.Google Scholar
[6]Kappe, L.-C. and Kappe, W.P., ‘On 3–Engel groups’, Bull. Austral. Math. Soc. 7 (1972), 391–405.Google Scholar
[7]Mahdavianary, S.K., ‘A special class of three-Engel groups’, Arch. Math. 40 (1983), 193–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Roseblade, J. E., ‘On groups in which every subgroup is subnormal’, J. Algebra 2 (1965), 402–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Robinson, D.J.S., A course in the theory of groups (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Stadelmann, M., ‘Gruppen, deren Untergruppen subnormal vom Defekt zwei sind’, Arch. Math. 30 (1978), 364–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Traustason, G., ‘On groups in which every subgroup is subnormal of defect at most three’, J. Austral. Math. Soc. Ser. A 64 (1998), 1–24.Google Scholar
[12]Vaughan-Lee, M., The restricted burnside problem (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993).Google Scholar