Department of Mathematics, The University of Queensland, Queensland 4072, AustraliaCurrent address: Albany Campus, Massey University, Private Bag 102–904, Auckland, New Zealand
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
[1]Burton, P.J. and Gould, M.D., ‘A unitary group formulation of the complete active space configuration interaction method II. An approach based on the subgroup chain U (n = n0 + n1 + n2) ⊇ U (n0) × U (n1 + n2) ⊇ U (n0) × U (n1) × U (n2)’, J. Chem. Phys.96 (1992), 5261–5271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]
[2]Gould, M.D. and Battle, J.S., ‘Spin dependent unitary group approach II. Derivations of matrix elements for spin dependent operators’, J. Chem. Phys.99 (1993), 5961–5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]
[3]Gould, M.D., ‘Unitary group approach to general system partitioning II U (n) matrix element evaluation in a composite basis’, Int. J. Quantum Chem.30 (1986), 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]
[4]Gould, M.D. and Chandler, G.S., ‘A unitary group formulation of the complete active space configuration interaction method I. General formalism’, J. Quantum Chem.30 (1989), 3680–3685.Google Scholar
[5]
[5]Gould, M.D. and Paldus, J., ‘Unitary group approach to general system partitioning I. Calculation of U (n): U (n1) × U (n2) reduced matrix elements and reduced Wigner coefficients’, Int. J. Quantum Chem.30 (1986), 327–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]
[6]Gould, M.D. and Paldus, J., ‘Spin dependent unitary group approach I. General formalism’, J. Chem. Phys.92 (1990), 7394–7401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar