Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T01:07:59.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A case of boundedness in Littlewood's problem on oscillatory differential equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2009

G.R. Morris
G.R. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is shown that all solutions of ẍ + 2x3 = p(t) are bounded, the notation indicating that p is periodic. It is not necessary to have a small parameter multiplying p.

The essential step is to show by appeal to Moser's theorem that, under the mapping (of the initial-value plane) which corresponds to the equation, there are invariant simple closed curves. This implies also that there is an uncountable infinity of almost-periodic solutions and, for each positive integer m, an infinity of periodic solutions of least period 2mπ (2π being taken as the least period of p ).

It is suggested that for a large class of equations the same attack would show all solutions of ẍ + g(x) = p(t) bounded. However, in order to show the method clearly, no generalisation is attempted here.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 71 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1976

References

[1]Birkhoff, George D., “An extension of Poincaré's last geometric theorem”, Acta Math. 47 (1926), 297–311. see also George David Birkhoff, Collected mathematical papers, Vol. II, 252–266.(Amer. Math. Soc., New York, 1960).Google Scholar
[2]Birkhoff, George D., Dynamical systems (Colloquium Publications, 9. Amer. Math. Soc., New York, 1927; reprinted Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Island, 1966).Google Scholar
[3]Earl, A. Coddington and Norman Levinson, Theory of ordinary differential equations (McGraw-Hill, New York, Toronto, London, 1955).Google Scholar
[4]Littlewood, J.E., “Unbounded solutions of ÿ + g(y); = p(t), J. London Math. Soc. 41 (1966), 491–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Littlewood, J.E., “Unbounded solutions of an equation ÿ + g(y) = P(t), with p(t) periodic and bounded, and g(y)/y ∞ as y → ±∞”, J. London Math. Soc. 41 (1966), 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Littlewood, John E., Some problems in real and complex analysis (Heath, Lexington, Massachusetts, 1968).Google Scholar
[7]Morris, G.R., “A differential equation for undamped forced non-linear oscillations. I”, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 51 (1955), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Morris, G.R., “A differential equation for undamped forced non-linear oscillations. II”, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 54 (1958), 426–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Moser, J., “On invariant curves of area-preserving mappings of an annulus”, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. Göttingen Math.-Phys. Kl. II 1962, 1–20.Google Scholar
[10]Whittaker, E.T. and Watson, G.N., A course of modem analysis: an introduction to the general theory of infinite processes and of analytic functions; with an account of the principal transcendental functions, fourth edition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1935).Google Scholar