Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T02:51:34.131Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some evidence of gustatory discrimination in the cotton stainer Dysdercus fasciatus Sign. (Hem., Pyrrhocoridae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. J. Peregrine
D. J. Peregrine
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University College, Cardiff, South Wales
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In laboratory experiments with Dysdercus fasciatus Sign, systematic testing of the stylets with a sucrose solution and distilled water has shown that the receptors mediating the salivary response to sucrose are located either on the maxillary stylets or at some site internal to them. Electronmicroscopical examination showed that the maxillary stylets were not innervated, and histological evidence further suggested the epipharyngeal organ as the site of gustatory discrimination. Dendrites located in the mandibular sclerites by means of the electron microscope could possibly have a proprioceptor function.

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 62 , Issue 2 , November 1972 , pp. 211 - 214
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Awati, P. R. (1914). The mechanism of suction in the potato capsid bug, Lygus pabulinus Linn.—Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 685–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernard, J., Pinet, J. M. & Boistel, J. (1970). Electrophysiologie des récepteurs des stylets maxillaires de Triatorna infestans—Action de la température et de la teneur en eau de l'air.—J. Insect Physiol. 16, 2157–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, R. H. E. (1962). Response of the aphid Myzus persicae (Sulz.) to some fluids applied to the mouthparts.—Can. Ent. 94, 707–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frings, H. & Frings, M. (1949). The loci of contact chemoreceptors in insects.—Am. Midl. Nat. 41, 602–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, I. R. & Grimstone, A. V. (1960). On flagellar structure in certain flagellates.—J. biophys. biochem. Cytol. 7, 697–715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glauert, A. M. (1965). The fixation and embedding of biological speciments. In Kay, D. H. Ed. Techniques for electron microscopy, 166–212. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Glauert, A. M. & Glauert, R. H. (1958). Araldite as an embedding medium for electron microscopy.—J. biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 4, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kemper, H. (1929). Untersuchungen über die Sinnesorgane und die Sinnesphysiologie der Bettwanze.—Z. Desinfekt. Band 21, 285–297.Google Scholar
Miles, P. W. (1958). Contact chemoreception in some Heteroptera including chemoreception internal to the stylet food canal.—J. Insect Physiol. 2, 338–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, E. S. (1963). The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy.—J. Cell Biol. 17, 208–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slifer, E. H. (1954). The permeability of the sensory pegs on the antennae of the grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididæ).—Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 106, 122–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H. (1962). Sensory hairs with permeable tips on the tarsi of the yellow-fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti.—Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 55, 531–535.Google Scholar
Slifer, E. H. (1970). The structure of arthropod chemoreceptors.—A. Rev. Ent. 15, 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slifer, E. H., Prestage, J. J.. & Beams, H. W. (1959). The chemoreceptors and other sense organs on the antennal flagellum of the grasshopper (Orthoptera, Acrididæ).—J. Morph. 105, 145–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wensler, R. J. & Filshie, B. K. (1969). Gustatory sense organs in the food canal of aphids.—J. Morph. 129, 473–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar