Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-frp75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T13:38:47.166Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships of intercropped maize, stem borer damage to maize yield and land-use efficiency in the humid forest of Cameroon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Chabi-Olaye ,
C. Nolte ,
F. Schulthess  and
C. Borgemeister
A. Chabi-Olaye
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Diseases and Plant Protection, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Humid Forest Ecoregional Centre, Messa 2008 Yaoundé, Cameroon
C. Nolte
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Humid Forest Ecoregional Centre, Messa 2008 Yaoundé, Cameroon
F. Schulthess
Affiliation:
International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
C. Borgemeister*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plant Diseases and Plant Protection, Herrenhäuser Str. 2, 30419 Hannover, Germany International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology, PO Box 30772-00100, Nairobi, Kenya
*
*Fax: +254 20 860110 E-mail: dg@icipe.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Stem borers are the most important maize pests in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Field trials were conducted in the long and short rainy seasons of 2002 and 2003 to assess the level of damage and yield reductions caused by stem borers in monocropped maize and in maize intercropped with non-host plants such as cassava, cowpea and soybean. The intercrops were planted in two spatial arrangements, i.e. alternating hills or alternating rows. All intercrops and the maize monocrop were grown with and without insecticide treatment for assessment of maize yield loss due to borer attacks. The land-use efficiency of each mixed cropping system was evaluated by comparing it with the monocrop. The temporal fluctuation of larval infestations followed the same pattern in all cropping systems, but at the early stage of plant growth, larval densities were 21.3–48.1% higher in the monocrops than in intercrops, and they tended to be higher in alternating rows than alternating hills arrangements. At harvest, however, pest densities did not significantly vary between treatments. Maize monocrops had 3.0–8.8 times more stems tunnelled and 1.3–3.1 times more cob damage than intercrops. Each percentage increase in stem tunnelling lowered maize grain yield by 1.10 and 1.84 g per plant, respectively, during the long and short rainy season in 2002, and by 5.39 and 1.41 g per plant, respectively, in 2003. Maize yield losses due to stem borer were 1.8–3.0 times higher in monocrops than in intercrops. Intercrops had generally a higher land-use efficiency than monocrops, as indicated by land-equivalent-ratios and area-time-equivalent-ratios of >1.0. Land-use efficiency was similar in both spatial arrangements. At current price levels, the net production of mixed cropping systems was economically superior to controlling stem borers with insecticide in monocropped maize. The maize–cassava intercrop yielded the highest land equivalent ratios and the highest replacement value of the intercrop. At medium intensity cropping this system is thus recommended for land-constrained poor farmers who do not use external inputs such as fertilizer and insecticides.

Keywords

stem borersCameroonmaizeyield lossintercroppingland-use efficiencycassavacowpeasoybean

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 95 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 417 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adesiyun, A.A. (1979) Effects of intercrop on frit fly, Oscinella frit, oviposition and larval survival on oats. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 24, 204–766.Google Scholar
Altieri, M.A., Letourneau, D.K. (1982) Vegetation management and biological control in agroecosystems. Crop Protection 1, 405–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andow, D.A. (1991) Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annual Review of Entomology 36, 561–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baliddawa, C.W. (1985) Plant species diversity and crop pest control: an analytical review. Insect Science and Its Application 6, 479–487.Google Scholar
Bosque-Pérez, N.A., Mareck, J.H. (1991) Effect of the stem borer Eldana saccharina Walker (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on the yield of maize. Bulletin of Entomological Research 81, 243–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardwell, K.F., Schulthess, F., Ndemah, R. & Ngoko, Z. (1997) A systems approach to assess crop health and maize yield losses due to pests and diseases in Cameroon. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 65, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabi-Olaye, A., Nolte, C., Schulthess, F. & Borgemeister, C. (2005a) Abundance, dispersion and parasitism of the noctuid stem borer Busseola fusca (Fuller) in maize in the humid forest zone of southern Cameroon. Bulletin of Entomological Research 95, 169–177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chabi-Olaye, A., Nolte, C., Schulthess, F. & Borgemeister, C. (2005b) Effects of grain legumes and cover crops on maize yield and plant damage by Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the humid forest of southern Cameroon. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, (in press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAOFAO (1999) Food outlook. www.fao.org/WAICENT/faoinfo/economic/giews.htmGoogle Scholar
Fukai, S., Trenbath, B.R. (1993) Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component crops. Field Crops Research 34, 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gounou, S., Schulthess, F., Shanower, T., Hammond, W.N.O., Braima, H., Cudjoe, A.R., Adjakloe, R., Antwi, K.K. & Olaleye, I. (1994) Stem and ear borers of maize in Ghana. Plant Health Management Research Monograph No. 4. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria.Google Scholar
Härdter, R., Horst, W.J., Schmidt, G. & Frey, E. (1991) Yields and land-use efficiency of maize–cowpea crop rotation in comparison to mixed and monocropping on an Alfisol in northern Ghana. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 166, 326–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiebsch, C. (1978) Comparing intercrops with monocultures. pp. 187–200 in Agronomic economic research on soils of the tropics, 1976–1977. Annual report, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USAGoogle Scholar
Hiebsch, C.K., McCollum, R.E. (1987) Area time equivalency ratio: a method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agronomy Journal 79, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, T. (1983) Behavioural biology, feeding habits and ecology of three species of maize stemborers: Eldana saccharina (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), Sesamia calamistis and Busseola fusca (Noctuidae) in Ibadan, Nigeria, West Africa. Journal of the Georgia Entomological Society 18, 259–272.Google Scholar
Khan, Z.R., Chiliswa, P., Ampong-Nyarko, K., Smart, L.A., Polaszek, A., Wandera, J., Mulaa, M.A. (1997) Utilization of wild gramineous plants for management of cereal stemborers in Africa. Insect Science and Its Application 17, 143–150.Google Scholar
Kruess, A. & Tscharntke, T. (2000) Species richness and parasitism in a fragmented landscape: experiments and field studies with insects on Vicia sepium. Oecologia 122, 129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Litsinger, J.A. & Moody, K. (1976) Integrated pest management in multiple cropping systems 293–317 inPapendick, R.I., Sanchez, P.A. (Eds) Multiple cropping, Triplett Madison, Wisconsin American Society and Agronomy.Google Scholar
Mason, S.C., Leihner, D.E., Vorst, J.J. & Salazar, E. (1986) Cassava–cowpea and cassava–peanut intercropping. II. Leaf area index and dry matter accumulation. Agronomy Journal 78, 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R., Willey, R.W. (1980) The concept of a 'land equivalent ratio' and advantages in yield from intercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16, 217–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutsaers, H.J.W., Ezumah, H.C. & Osiru, D.S.O. (1993) Cassava-based intercropping: a review. Field Crops Research 34, 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndemah, R. (1999) Towards an integrated crop management strategy for the African stalk borer, Busseola fusca (Fuller) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize systems in Cameroon. 136 pp. PhD thesis, University of Hannover, Germany (http://www.gartenbau.uni-hannover.de/ipp/ipp/Publikationen/Dissertationen.html).Google Scholar
Ndemah, R. & Schulthess, F. (2002) Yield of maize in relation to natural field infestations and damage by lepidopterous borers in the forest and forest/savannah transition zones of Cameroon. Insect Science and Its Application 22, 183–193.Google Scholar
Ndemah, R., Gounou, S. & Schulthess, F. (2002) The role of wild grasses in the management of lepidopterous cereal stemborers on maize in the forest zone of Cameroon and the derived savanna of southern Benin. Bulletin of Entomological Research 92, 507–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ndemah, R., Schulthess, F., Poehling, H.-M. & Borgemeister, C. (2000) Species composition and seasonal dynamics of lepidopterous stem borers on maize and elephant grass, Pennisetum purpureum (Moench) (Poaceae), at two forest margin sites in Cameroon. African Entomology 8, 265–272.Google Scholar
Ndemah, R., Schulthess, F., Korie, S., Borgemeister, C., Cardwell, K.F. (2001) Distribution, relative importance and effect of lepidopterous borers on maize yields in the forest zone and mid-altitude of Cameroon. Journal of Economic Entomology 94, 1434–1444.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ofori, F., Stern, W.R. (1986) Maize/cowpea intercrop system: effect of nitrogen fertilizer on productivity and efficiency. Field Crops Research 14, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ofori, F., Stern, W.R. (1987) The combined effects of nitrogen fertilizer and density of the legume component on production efficiency in a maize/cowpea intercrop system. Field Crops Research 16, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okigbo, B.N., Greenland, G.J. (1976) Integrated pest management in multiple cropping systems, 63–101 inPapendick, R.I., Sanchez, P.A., Triplett, G.B. (Eds) Multiple cropping Madison, Wisconsin, American Society for Agronomy.Google Scholar
Polaszek, A. (1998) African cereal stem borers: economic importance, taxonomy, natural enemies and control. pp. 530 CAB International in association with the ACP-EU Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Co-operation (CTA).Google Scholar
Risch, S.J., Andow, D., Altieri, M.A. (1983) Agroecosystem diversity and pest control: data, tentative conclusions, and new research directions. Environmental Entomology 12, 625–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Root, R.B. (1973) Organisation of a plant–arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecological Monographs 43, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute (1997) SAS/STAT Software: Changes and enhancements, through release 6.12 North Carolina, USA, SAS InstituteGoogle Scholar
Schulthess, F., Bosque-Pérez, N.A., Chabi-Olaye, A., Gounou, S., Ndemah, R. & Goergen, G. (1997) Exchanging natural enemies species of lepidopterous cereal stemborers between African regions. Insect Science and its Application 17, 97–108.Google Scholar
Schulthess, F., Chabi-Olaye, A. & Gounou, S. (2004) Multi-trophic level interactions in a cassava–maize mixed cropping system in the humid tropics of West Africa. Bulletin of Entomological Research 94, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sétamou, M., Schulthess, F., Bosque-Pérez, N.A., Thomas-Odjo, A. (1995) The effect of stem and cob borers on maize subjected to different nitrogen treatments. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 77, 205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sétamou, M., Schulthess, F., Poehling, H.-M. & Borgemeister, C. (2000) Infestations and damage of maize by Mussidia nigrivenella Ragonot (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in Benin, West Africa. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 650–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, J. (1976) Influence of crop background on natural enemies of aphids on Brussels sprouts. Annals of Applied Biology 83, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Songa, J.M., Zhou, G., Overholt, W.A. (2001) Relationships of stemborer damage and plant physical conditions to maize yield in a semi-arid zone of eastern Kenya. Insect Science and its Application 21, 243–249.Google Scholar
Southwood, T.R.E., Way, M.J. (1970) Ecological background to pest management 6–29 in Rabb, R.L., Guthrie, F.E (Eds) Concepts of pest management, North CarolinaState UniversityGoogle Scholar
Thies, C. & Tscharntke, T. (1999) Landscape structure and biological control in agroecosystems. Science 285, 893–895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Berg, J., Nur, A.F., & Polaszek, A. (1998) Cultural control. pp. 333–347in Polaszek, A., (Ed.) Cereal stem-borers in Africa: economic importance, taxonomy, natural enemies and control. International Institute of Entomology, CAB International.Google Scholar
van Rensburg, J.B.J., Walters, M.C., Giliomee, J.H. (1988) Plant population and cultivar effects on yield losses caused by the maize stalk borer Busseola fusca (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). South African Journal of Plant and Soil 5, 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandermeer, J. (1989) The ecology of intercropping 237Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, M.J., Heathcote, G.D. (1966) Interaction of crop density of field beans, abundance of Aphis fabae Scop. virus incidence and aphid control by chemicals. Annals of Applied Biology 57, 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar