Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-n7lw4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-05T03:07:20.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of artificial diets based on different legume seeds on the nutritional physiology and digestive function of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2022

Hasan Jafari ,
Seyed Ali Hemmati Open the ORCID record for Seyed Ali Hemmati [Opens in a new window]  and
Behzad Habibpour
Hasan Jafari
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Seyed Ali Hemmati*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
Behzad Habibpour
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Seyed Ali Hemmati, Email: sa.hemmati@scu.ac.ir
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is considered a serious agricultural pest worldwide. We explored the effects of artificial diets containing ten legumes, including broad beans (Shadan, Feyz, Saraziri, Barekat, and Mahta cultivars), white kidney beans (Dehghan cultivar), red kidney beans (Goli cultivar), common beans (Khomein cultivar), cowpeas (Mashhad and Arabi cultivars) on the feeding responses of H. armigera by quantifying specific primary and secondary metabolites in the studied legumes and determining larval nutritional indices and digestive enzyme activities. The results showed that the highest efficiency of conversion of digested food (ECD) and relative growth rate values (RGR) of whole larval instars were obtained in the Dehghan and Goli cultivars. However, the lowest values of ECD and RGR were observed in the larvae fed on the Khomein and Mahta cultivars. The highest proteolytic and amylolytic activities of larvae were found on the Dehghan and Mashhad cultivars. The highest and lowest values of standardized insect-growth index and index of plant quality were observed in larvae feeding on the Dehghan and Khomein cultivars, respectively. Additionally, significant variations in phytochemical metabolites were recorded among the studied legume cultivars. Significant negative or positive correlations were also found between feeding characteristics and enzymatic activities of H. armigera with the biochemical composition of the studied legumes. The cluster analysis results revealed that artificial diets containing Mahta and Khomein cultivars were unsuitable for H. armigera, and can be used as candidates for integrated pest management programs or for screening insect inhibitors to produce genetically modified pest-resistant plants.

Keywords

Correlationcotton bollwormdigestive functionIPMlegume seeds
Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 113 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 133 - 143
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atashi, N, Shishehbor, P, Seraj, AA, Rasekh, A, Hemmati, SA and Riddick, EW (2021) Effects of Helicoverpa armigera egg age on development, reproduction, and life table parameters of Trichogramma euproctidis. Insects 12, 569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babamir-Satehi, A, Habibpour, B, Aghdam, HR and Hemmati, SA (2022) Interaction between feeding efficiency and digestive physiology of the pink stem borer, Sesamia cretica Lederer (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and biochemical compounds of different sugarcane cultivars. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 16, 309–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-022-09898-wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baghery, F, Fathipour, Y and Naseri, B (2013) Nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on seeds of five host plants. Applied Entomology and Phytopathology 80, 19–27.Google Scholar
Bernfeld, P (1955) Amylases, a and b. Methods in Enzymology 1, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, DR and McGregor, PG (1996) Gut pH and amylase and protease activity in larvae of the New Zealand grass grub (Costelytra zealandica; Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) as a basis for selecting inhibitors. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 26, 69–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradford, MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72, 248–254.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y, Ni, X and Buntin, GD (2009) Physiological, nutritional, and biochemical bases of corn resistance to foliage-feeding fall armyworm. Journal of Chemical Ecology 35, 297–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elpidina, EN, Vinokurov, KS, Gromenko, VA, Rudenshaya, YA, Dunaevsky, YE and Zhuzhikov, DP (2001) Compartmentalization of proteinases and amylases in Nauphoeta cinerea midgut. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 48, 206–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fallahnejad-Mojarrad, N, Goldasteh, S, Rafiei-Karahroodi, Z and Vafaei Shoushtari, R (2017) Response of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to different semi artificial diets. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology 19, 1303–1318.Google Scholar
Fathipour, Y, Chegeni, E and Moharramipour, S (2018) Genotype-associated variation in nutritional indices of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed on canola. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology 20, 83–94.Google Scholar
Fitt, GP (1989) The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annual Review of Entomology 34, 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gvozdenac, SM, Prvulovi, DM, Radovanovi, MN, Ovuka, S, Mikli, VJ, Acanski, JM, Tanasković, ST and Vukajlović, FN (2018) Life history of Plodia interpunctella Hübner on sunflower seeds: effects of seed qualitative traits and the initial seed damage. Journal of Stored Product Research 79, 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harsulkar, AM, Giri, AP, Patankar, AG, Gupta, VS, Sainani, MN, Ranjekar, PK and Deshpande, VV (1999) Successive use of non-host plant proteinase inhibitors required for effective inhibition of gut proteinases and larval growth of Helicoverpa armigera. Plant Physiology 121, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemati, SA, Naseri, B, Nouri-Ganbalani, G, Rafiee-Dastjerdi, H and Golizadeh, A (2012 a) Digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activities and feeding responses of Helicoverpa armigera (Noctuidae: Lepidoptera) on different host plants. Journal of Economic Entomology 105, 1439–1446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemati, SA, Naseri, B, Nouri-Ganbalani, G, Rafiee-Dastjerdi, H and Golizadeh, A (2012 b) Effect of different host plants on nutritional indices of the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera. Journal of Insect Science 12, 55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemmati, SA, Takalloo, Z, Taghdir, M, Mehrabadi, M, Balalaei, S, Moharramipour, S and Sajedi, RH (2021 a) The trypsin inhibitor pro-peptide induces toxic effects in Indianmeal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 171, 104730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemmati, SA, Karam Kiani, N, Serrão, JE and Jitonnom, J (2021 b) Inhibitory potential of a designed peptide inhibitor based on zymogen structure of trypsin from Spodoptera frugiperda: in silico insights. International Journal of Peptide Research and Therapeutics 27, 1677–1687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemmati, SA, Shishehbor, P and Stelinski, LL (2022) Life table parameters and digestive enzyme activity of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on selected legume cultivars. Insects 13, 661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hosseininaveh, V, Bandani, AR, Azmayeshfard, P, Hosseinkhani, S and Kazzazi, M (2007) Digestive proteolytic and amylolytic activities in Trogoderma granarium Everts (Dermestidae: Coleoptera). Journal of Stored Products Research 43, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ismail, SM (2020) Effect of sublethal doses of some insecticides and their role on detoxication enzymes and protein-content of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bulletin of the National Research Centre 44, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoyama, K, Kawahira, Y, Murata, M and Tojo, S (1999) Fluctuations of some characteristics in the common cutworm, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) reared under different diets. Applied Entomology and Zoology 34, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, Z, Tang, M and Wu, J (1999) The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chemistry 64, 555–559.Google Scholar
Jongsma, MA and Bolter, C (1997) The adaptation of insects to plant protease inhibitors. Journal of Insect Physiology 43, 885–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, GG, Gould, F, Deponti, OMB and Stinner, RE (1987) Ecological, agricultural, genetic, and commercial considerations in the deployment of insect-resistant germplasm. Environmental Entomology 16, 327–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koricheva, J and Haukioja, E (1992) Effects of air pollution on host plant quality, individual performance and population density of Eriocrania miners (Lepidoptera: Eriocraniidae). Environmental Entomology 21, 1386–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korrat, EEE, Abdelmonem, AE, Helalia, AAR and Khalifa, HMS (2012) Toxicological study of some conventional and nonconventional insecticides and their mixtures against cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annals of Agricultural Science 57, 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotkar, HM, Sarate, PJ, Tamhane, VA, Gupta, VS and Giri, AP (2009) Responses of midgut amylases of Helicoverpa armigera to feeding on various host plants. Journal of Insect Physiology 55, 663–670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouhi, D, Naseri, B and Golizadeh, A (2014) Nutritional performance of the tomato fruit borer, Helicoverpa armigera, on different tomato cultivars. Journal of Insect Science 14, 102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
La Rossa, FR, Vasicek, A and Lopez, MC (2013) Effects of pepper (Capsicum annuum) cultivars on the biology and life table parameters of Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Neotropical Entomology 42, 634–641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lazarevic, J and Peric-Mataruga, V (2003) Nutritive stress effects on growth and digestive physiology of Lymantria dispar larvae. Yugoslav Medical Biochemistry 22, 53–59.Google Scholar
Liu, Z, Li, D, Gong, PY and Wu, KJ (2004) Life table studies of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), on different host plants. Environmental Entomology 33, 1570–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naseri, B and Arghand, A (2015) Effect of artificial diet containing seeds of five corn hybrids on nutritional performance of Helicoverpa armigera (Lep.: Noctuidae). Journal of Crop Protection 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
Naseri, B, Fathipour, Y, Moharramipour, S and Hosseininaveh, V (2010 a) Nutritional indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, on 13 soybean varieties. Journal of Insect Science 10, 151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naseri, B, Fathipour, Y, Moharamipour, S, Hosseininaveh, V and Gatehouse, AMR (2010 b) Digestive proteolytic and apamylolytic activities of Helicoverpa armigera in response to feeding on different Soybean cultivars. Pest Management Science 66, 1316–1323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nathan, SS, Chung, PG and Murugan, K (2005) Effect of biopesticides applied separately or together on nutritional indices of the rice leaf folder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. Phytoparasitica 33, 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, JL (2002) Insect Physiology and Biochemistry. London, UK: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ofuya, TI and Credlandt, PF (1995) Responses of three populations of the seed beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), to seed resistance in selected varieties of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. Journal of Stored Products Research 31, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radwan, EH, Youssef, NS, Hashem, HO and Shalaby, AM (2019) The effects of zanzalacht on the gonotrophic cycle of the adult house fly Musca domestica. Journal of Plants and Animal Ecology 1, 23–39.Google Scholar
Rahimi Namin, F, Naseri, B and Razmjou, J (2014) Nutritional performance and activity of some digestive enzymes of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, in response to seven tested bean cultivars. Journal of Insect Science 14, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanon, A, Ba, NM, Binso-Dabire, CL and Pittendrigh, BR (2010) Effectiveness of spinosad (naturalytes) in controlling the cowpea storage pest, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 203–210.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scriber, JM and Slansky, F (1981) The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annual Review of Entomology 26, 183–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shishehbor, P and Hemmati, SA (2022) Investigation of secondary metabolites in bean cultivars and their impact on the nutritional performance of Spodoptera littoralis (Lep.: Noctuidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 112, 378–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, HH and Hale, RL (1965) Mass-rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. Journal of Economic Entomology 58, 522–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soleimannejad, S, Fathipour, Y, Moharramipour, S and Zalucki, MP (2010) Evaluation of potential resistance in seeds of different soybean cultivars to Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using demographic parameters and nutritional indices. Journal of Economic Entomology 103, 1420–1430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonald, SF and Laima, SK (2001) Phenolics and cold tolerance of Brassica napus. Plant Agriculture 1, 1–5.Google Scholar
SPSS Inc. (2007) SPSS Base 16.0 User's Guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS Incorporation.Google Scholar
Talekar, NS, Opena, RT and Hanson, P (2006) Helicoverpa armigera management: a review of AVRDC's research on host plant resistance in tomato. Crop Protection 25, 461–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toews, MD, Cuperus, GW and Phillips, TW (2000) Susceptibility of eight U.S. wheat cultivars to infestation by Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae). Environmental Entomology 29, 250–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, JH and Wang, JJ (2001) Effects of host plant on biology and life table parameters of Aphis spiraecola (Hom. Aphididae). Environmental Entomology 30, 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twine, BH (1971) Cannibalistic behaviour of Heliothis armigera (Hub.). Queensland Journal of Agricultural Science 28, 153–157.Google Scholar
Waldbauer, GP (1968) The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Advances in Insect Physiology 5, 229–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamani Fard, S, Hemmati, SA, Shishehbor, P and Stelinski, LL (2022) Growth, consumption and digestive enzyme activities of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd) on various mung bean cultivars reveal potential tolerance traits. Journal of Applied Entomology 146, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar