Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-gs9qr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T14:38:51.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tribolium aggregation pheromone: monitoring, range of attraction and orientation behaviour of T. castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

D. Obeng-Ofori  and
T.H. Coaker
D. Obeng-Ofori
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
T.H. Coaker
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Adult male Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) secrete an aggregation pheromone that is attractive to both sexes. The responses of T. castaneum to different pheromone concentrations (0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 mg/septa) were tested in the laboratory. In general, pheromone-baited pitfall and probe traps were over 50% more effective than unbaited traps. A curvilinear relationship between numbers trapped and pheromone concentration indicated that 2.0 mg of pheromone per trap elicited an optimum response. The proportion of marked beetles released in 2.5 m × 0.3 m × 0.4 m trough, filled with wheat and caught by unbaited probe traps, declined with distance from release point, whereas pheromone traps captured a similar proportion up to 2.0 m from the traps. Tracks of T. castaneum responding to different pheromone concentrations in still and moving air in a 2.5 m × 0.4 m olfactometer indicated that the aggregation pheromone stimulated the beetles to walk faster at higher concentrations, to increase the frequency and magnitude of turning and to decrease track reversal distances and distances between turns. The behavioural responses of the beetles to the pheromone in still and moving air were similar, indicating chemotaxis as the major orientation mechanism used by T. castaneum to locate an odour source. The beetles showed greater orientation efficiency within a discrete pheromone plume than a diffuse plume.

Information

Type
Research Paper
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 80 , Issue 4 , December 1990 , pp. 443 - 451
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baker, T.C., Meyer, W. & Roelofs, W.L. (1981) Sex pheromone dosage and blend specificity of response by oriental fruit moth males. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 30, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W.J. & Kramer, E. (1979) Search and anemotactic orientation of cockroaches. Journal of Insect Physiology 25, 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W.J. & Kramer, E. (1980) Sex pheromone-stimulated orientation of the American cockroach on a servosphere apparatus. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W.J. & Tobin, T.P. (1981) Orientation to sex pheromone in the Amerian cockroach: analysis of chemo-orientation mechanisms. Journal of the Insect Physiology 27, 501–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, W.J. & Tobin, T.P. (1982) Chemo-orientation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 57, 219–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkholder, W.E. & Ma, M. (1985) Pheromones for monitoring and control of stored-product insects. Annual Review of Entomology 30, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farkas, S.R., Shorey, H.H. & Gaston, I.K. (1974) Sex pheromones of Lepidoptera: influence of pheromone concentration and visual cues on aerial odour-trail following by males of Pectinophora gossypiella. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 67, 633–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faustini, D.L., Burkholder, W.E. & Lamb, R.J. (1981) Sexually dimorphic setiferous sex patch in the female Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), site of aggregation pheromone production. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7, 465–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faustini, D.L., Rowe, J.R. & Burkholder, W.E. (1982) A male-produced aggregation pheromone in Tribolium brevicornis (LeConte) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and interspecific responses of several Tribolium species. Journal of Stored Product Research 18, 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C. & Coaker, T.H. (1979) Factors affecting the behavioural response of adult cabbage rootfly, Delia brassicae to host plant odour. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 25, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, W.A. (1978) Effects of sex pheromone on locomotion in the male American cockroach, Periplaneta americana. Journal of Chemical Ecology 4, 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howell, J.F. (1974) The competition effect of field populations of codling moth on sex attractant trap efficiency. Environmental Entomology 3, 803–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, O.T., Lomer, R.A. & Howse, P.E. (1981) Responses of male Mediterranean fruit flies, Ceratitis capitata to Trimedlure in a wind tunnel of novel design. Physiological Entomology 6, 175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, J.S. (1977) Olfactory responses to distant plants and other odour sources. pp. 67–91in Shorey, H.H. & McKelvey, J.J. Jr (Eds) Chemical control of insect behaviour. New York, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J.S. (1978) The concepts of olfactory ‘arrestment’ and ‘attraction’. Physiological Entomology 3, 91–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenen, L.P.S. & Baker, T.C. (1982) The effects of pheromone concentration on the flight behaviour of the oriental fruit moth, Grapholitha molesta. Physiological Entomology 7, 423–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mankin, R.W., Vick, K.W., Mayer, M.S., Coffelt, J.A. & Callahan, P.S. (1980) Models for dispersal of vapours in open and confined spaces: application to sex pheromone trapping in a warehouse. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6, 929–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, C.A. & McDougall, G.A. (1973) Spruce budworm moth trapping using virgin females. Canadian Journal of Zoology 51, 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minks, A.K. & Dejong, D.J. (1975) Determination of spraying dates for Adoxophyes orana by sex pheromone traps and temperature recordings. Journal of Economic Entomology 68, 729–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murlis, J., Bettany, B.W., Kelley, J. & Martin, L. (1982) The analysis of flight paths of male Egyptian cotton leafworm moths, Spodoptera littoralis, to sex pheromone source in the field. Physiological Entomology 7, 435–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nottingham, S.F. & Coaker, T.H. (1985) The olfactory response of cabbage root fly, Delia radicum to the host plant volatile allylisothiocyanate. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 39, 307–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, H., Croft, B.A., Howitt, A.J. (1976) Forecasting codling moth phenology based on pheromone trap catches and physiological time models. Canadian Entomologist 108, 449–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shorey, H.H. (1973) Behavioural responses to insect pheromones. Annual Review of Entomology 18, 349–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, T. (1980) 4,8-Dimethyldecanal: the aggregation pheromone of the flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum and T. confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 44, 2519–2520.Google Scholar
Visser, J.H. (1986) Host odour perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology 31, 121–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, J.H. (1988) Host-plant finding by insects: orientation, sensory input and search patterns. Journal of Insect Physiolohy 34, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visser, J.H. & Nielsen, J.K. (1977) Specificity in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 21, 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, C. (1985) The exploitation of insect communication by man – fact or fantasy? pp. 379–400in Lewis, T. (Ed.) Insect communication. London, Orlando, San Diego, New York, Toronto, Montreal, Sydney, Tokyo, Academic Press (12th Symposium, Royal Entomological Society of London).Google Scholar