Skip to main content Accessibility help

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.

Cited by
  • Crossref logo 26
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2003. Constructing a complex world: The frontiers of international relations theory and foreign policy‐making. Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 37.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Berkman, Michael B. and Reenock, Christopher 2004. Incremental Consolidation and Comprehensive Reorganization of American State Executive Branches. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 48, Issue. 4, p. 796.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Brunk, Gregory G. and Hunter, Kennith G. 2008. An ecological perspective on interest groups and economic stagnation. The Journal of Socio-Economics, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 194.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Dunleavy, Patrick 2010. New Worlds in Political Science. Political Studies, Vol. 58, Issue. 2, p. 239.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Boin, Arjen and Fishbacher-Smith, Denis 2011. The importance of failure theories in assessing crisis management: The Columbia space shuttle disaster revisited. Policy and Society, Vol. 30, Issue. 2, p. 77.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Boin, Arjen and Fischbacher-Smith, Denis 2011. The Importance of Failure Theories in Assessing Crisis Management: The Columbia Space Shuttle Disaster Revisited. SSRN Electronic Journal,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Karsai, Márton Kaski, Kimmo Barabási, Albert-László and Kertész, János 2012. Universal features of correlated bursty behaviour. Scientific Reports, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Ki-Joon Hong 2014. Path Emergence in the Helsinki Process: Implications for Northeast Asia. The Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 32, Issue. 1, p. 109.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Ki-Joon Hong 2014. A Critique of New Institutionalism: A Path Emergence Theory Perspective. Korean Political Science Review, Vol. 48, Issue. 6, p. 5.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Zhukov, Dmitry S. Kanishchev, Valery V. and Lyamin, Sergey K. 2016. Application of the Theory of Self-Organized Criticality to the Investigation of Historical Processes. Sage Open, Vol. 6, Issue. 4,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Zhukov, Dmitry S. and Lyamin, Sergey K. 2016. The Modeling of Institutional Modernization by Means of Fractal Geometry. Sage Open, Vol. 6, Issue. 2,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Oatley, Thomas 2019. Toward a political economy of complex interdependence. European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 957.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Reilly, Andrew 2019. A Complex Adaptive Systems Approach to the Psychology of Political Change. p. 1.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Reilly, Andrew Rooy, Dirk Van and Angus, Simon 2019. A Complex Adaptive Systems Approach to the Relationship between Personality and Social Division. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Vol. 36, Issue. 6, p. 765.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Alan Fine, Gary 2019. Moral Cultures, Reputation Work, and the Politics of Scandal. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 247.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Voinea, Camelia Florela 2020. Political culture research: dilemmas and trends. Prologue to the special issue. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 54, Issue. 2, p. 361.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Zhukov, Dmitry Kunavin, Konstantin and Lyamin, Sergey 2020. Online Rebellion: Self-Organized Criticality of Contemporary Protest Movements. Sage Open, Vol. 10, Issue. 2,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Zhukov, D. 2022. Signature of rebellion: how SOC theory helps to detect signs of protest mobilization on the web. Journal of Political Research, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 3.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Zhukov, Dmitry 2022. How the theory of self-organized criticality explains punctuated equilibrium in social systems. Methodological Innovations, Vol. 15, Issue. 2, p. 163.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Maltseva, Svetlana Kornilov, Vasily Barakhnin, Vladimir Gorbunov, Alexander and Song, Yue 2022. Self‐Organization in Network Sociotechnical Systems. Complexity, Vol. 2022, Issue. 1,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Download full list
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Quick Links

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Aspire website

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Self-Organized Criticality: A New Theory of Political Behaviour and Some of Its Implications
  • Volume 31, Issue 2
  • GREGORY G. BRUNK (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000163
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Self-Organized Criticality: A New Theory of Political Behaviour and Some of Its Implications
  • Volume 31, Issue 2
  • GREGORY G. BRUNK (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000163
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Self-Organized Criticality: A New Theory of Political Behaviour and Some of Its Implications
  • Volume 31, Issue 2
  • GREGORY G. BRUNK (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000163
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.