Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T13:35:37.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

Magnus B. Rasmussen Open the ORCID record for Magnus B. Rasmussen [Opens in a new window]  and
Carl Henrik Knutsen Open the ORCID record for Carl Henrik Knutsen [Opens in a new window]
Magnus B. Rasmussen*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Oslo
Carl Henrik Knutsen
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Oslo
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: m.b.rasmussen@stv.uio.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues that the extent to which political parties are institutionalized shapes welfare state development. Institutionalized parties allow politicians to overcome co-ordination problems, avoid capture by special interests and form stable linkages with broad social groups. These features both enable and incentivize politicians to pursue extensive welfare policies. The study employs measures of party institutionalization and welfare state features to study these proposed relationships. Even when accounting for country- and year-fixed effects and plausible confounders such as electoral system, unionization, regime type and state capacity, the authors find clear relationships between party institutionalization and more extensive and universal welfare states. Focusing on universalism, they find that the relationship is more pronounced when constraints on executives are strong and in democracies, but that it also exists in autocracies. Further, when disaggregating party institutionalization and evaluating mechanisms, the linkages that institutionalized parties form with social groups constitute one important, but not the only relevant, factor.

Keywords

social policywelfare stateparty institutionalizationuniversalismparties

Information

Type
Article
Information
British Journal of Political Science , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , July 2021 , pp. 1203 - 1229
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Acemoglu, D and Robinson, JA (2006) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Allern, EH and Bale, T (2012) Political parties and interest groups: disentangling complex relationships. Party Politics 18(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansell, BW and Samuels, DJ (2014) Inequality and Democratization: An Elite-Competition Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, S, Snyder, JM and Stewart, C (2001) Candidate positioning in US House elections. American Journal of Political Science 45(1), 136–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S (2000) The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizzarro, F, Hicken, A and Self, D (2017) The V-Dem Party Institutionalization Index: a new global indicator (1900–2015). V-Dem Working Paper 48. Available from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2968265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizzarro, F et al. (2018) Party strength and economic growth. World Politics, 70(2), 275–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. Cambridge, UK, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C, Miller, M and Rosato, S (2013) A complete data set of political regimes, 1800–2007. Comparative Political Studies 46(12), 1523–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C and Svolik, M (2013) The foundations of limited authoritarian government: institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. Journal of Politics 75(2), 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, J and Zanden, JL (2014) The Maddison project: collaborative research on historical national accounts. The Economic History Review 67(3), 627–651.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, B et al. (2003) The Logic of Political Survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carreras, M (2012) Party systems in Latin America after the third wave: a critical re-assessment. Journal of Politics in Latin America 4(1), 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chhibber, P, Jensenius, FR and Suryanarayan, P (2014) Party organization and party proliferation in India. Party Politics 20(4), 489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Lindberg, SI, Skaaning, S-E, Teorell, J, Altman, D, Bernhard, M, Steven, Fish M, Glynn, A, Hicken, A, Knutsen, CH, Marquardt, K, McMann, K, Miri, F, Paxton, P, Pemstein, D, Staton, J, Tzelgov, Ei, Wang, Y-t, and Zimmerman, B (2016a) V-Dem Country-Year Dataset v6. Varieties of Democracy Project. Link: https://www.v-dem.net/en/data/data-version-6/.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M, Gerring, J, Lindberg, SI, Skaaning, S-E, Teorell, J, Altman, D, Bernhard, M, Steven, Fish M, Glynn, A, Hicken, A, Knutsen, CH, Marquardt, K, McMann, K, Miri, F, Paxton, P, Pemstein, D, Staton, J, Tzelgov, Ei, Wang, Y-t, and Zimmerman, B (2016b) V-Dem Codebook v6. Varieties of Democracy Project. Link: https://www.v-dem.net/en/reference/version-6-mar-2016/.Google Scholar
Duverger, M (1959) Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ebbinghaus, B (1995) The Siamese twins: citizenship rights, cleavage formation, and party-union relations in Western Europe. International Review of Social History 40(S3), 51–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, SD (2007) Access to protection: domestic institutions and trade policy in democracies. International Organization 61(3), 571–605.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fairfield, T and Garay, C (2017) Redistribution under the right in Latin America: electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies 50(14), 1871–1906.Google Scholar
Folke, O and Rickne, J (2016) Electoral competition and gender differences in political careers. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11(1), 59–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frendreis, J, Gibson, J and Vertz, L (1990) The electoral relevance of local party organizations. The American Political Science Review 84(1), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, B (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science 2, 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlbach, S and Keefer, P (2011) Investment without democracy: ruling-party institutionalization and credible commitment in autocracies. Journal of Comparative Economics 39(2), 123–139.Google Scholar
Gerring, J and Thacker, SC (2004) Political institutions and corruption: the role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science 34, 295–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goertz, G (2006) Social Science Concepts : A User's Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggard, S and Kaufman, RR (2008) Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Henisz, WJ (2002) The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(2), 355–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, A (2009) Building Party Systems in Developing Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, A, Kollman, K and Simmons, JW (2016) Party system nationalization and the provision of public health services. Political Science Research and Methods 4(3), 573–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, A, Kuhonta, EM and Weiss, ML (2015) Party System Institutionalization in Asia : Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicken, A and Simmons, JW (2008) The personal vote and the efficacy of education spending. American Journal of Political Science 52(1), 109–124.Google Scholar
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, E and Stephens, JD (2012) Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, EM (1992) Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe. Cambidge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iversen, T (2005) Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, K and Colman, T (1998) Effects of party organization on performance during the ‘golden age'of parties. Political Studies 46(3), 611–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, C (2014) The Right and the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, MP and Mainwaring, S (2003) The nationalization of parties and party systems: an empirical measure and an application to the Americas. Party Politics 9(2), 139–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurado, I (2014) Party system nationalisation and social spending. European Journal of Political Research 53(2), 288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jurado, I and Leon, S (2019). Geography matters: the conditional effect of electoral systems on social spending. British Journal of Political Science 49(1), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalvyas, SN (1996) The rise of Christian democracy in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
Kalyvas, SN and Kersbergen, K (2010) Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13, 183–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, RS (2001) The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy. Party Politics 7(3), 277–296.Google Scholar
Katz, RS and Mair, P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1), 5–28.Google Scholar
Kim, W and Gandhi, J (2010) Coopting workers under dictatorship. Journal of Politics 72(3), 646–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H and Kselman, DM (2013) Economic development, democratic experience, and political parties' linkage strategies. Comparative Political Studies 46(11), 1453–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, CH and Rasmussen, MB (2018) The autocratic welfare state resource distribution, credible commitments and political survival. Comparative Political Studies 51 (5), 659–695.Google Scholar
Korpi, W and Palme, J (2007) The social citizenship indicator program (SCIP). Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S and Way, L (2010) Competitive Authoritarianism : Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindert, PH (2004) Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B (2006) Voting for Autocracy : Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S and Torcal, M (2006) Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. In Katz, RS and Crotty, WJ (eds), Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 204–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S and Zoco, E (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition: electoral volatility in old and new democracies. Party Politics 13(2), 155–178.Google Scholar
Martin, CJ and Swank, D (2008) The political origins of coordinated capitalism: business organizations, party systems, and state structure in the age of innocence. American Political Science Review 102(2), 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, J and Sánchez-Ancochea, D (2016) The Quest for Universal Social Policy in the South: Actors, Ideas, and Architectures. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, MK (2015) Electoral authoritarianism and human development. Comparative Political Studies 48(12), 1526–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moene, KO and Wallerstein, M (2001) Inequality, social insurance, and redistribution. American Political Science Review 95(4), 859–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orloff, AS and Skocpol, T (1984) Why not equal protection? Explaining the politics of public social spending in Britain, 1900–1911, and the United States, 1880s–1920. American Sociological Review 49(6), 726–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pemstein, D, Tzelgov, E and Wang, Y (2017) The V-Dem measurement model: latent variable analysis for cross-national and cross-temporal expert-coded data. University of Gothenburg:V-Dem Working Paper 21. Available from https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/9a/18/9a188a8b-1073-4bbb-9831-20d200a358c3/v-dem_working_paper_2015_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Persson, T and Tabellini, G (2004) Constitutions and economic policy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 18(1), 75–98.Google Scholar
Pribble, J (2013) Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, MB (2016) How organized labor shaped the origin and structure of the regulatory revolution 1870–2000 (PhD dissertation). Aarhus: Politica.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, MB and Knutsen, CH (2019) “Replication Data for: Party Institutionalization and Welfare State Development”, https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EDHLIN, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:mNEYgpaCeMJjtAABID7Tqg== [fileUNF]Google Scholar
Rothstein, B, Samanni, M and Teorell, J (2012) Explaining the welfare state: power resources vs. the Quality of Government. European Political Science Review 4(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, D and Zucco, C (2015) Crafting mass partisanship at the grass roots. British Journal of Political Science 45(4), 755–775.Google Scholar
Schumacher, G (2012) ‘Marx'or the market? Intra-party power and social democratic welfare state retrenchment. West European Politics 35(5), 1024–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumacher, G, De Vries, CE and Vis, B (2013) Why do parties change position? Party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics 75(2), 464–477.Google Scholar
Scruggs, L (2006) The generosity of social insurance, 1971–2002. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22(3), 349–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shefter, M (1977) Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy. Politics & Society 7(4), 403–451.Google Scholar
Spies, DC and Kaiser, A (2014) Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics 20(4), 576–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, SC et al. (2013) Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, M (2012) The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tavits, M (2012a) Party organizational strength and party unity in post-communist Europe. European Political Science Review 4(3), 409–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, M (2012b) Organizing for success: party organizational strength and electoral performance in postcommunist Europe. Journal of Politics 74(1), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teorell, J et al. (2019) Measuring polyarchy across the globe, 1900-2017. Studies in Comparative International Development 54(1), 71–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, T (1997) Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wright, J (2008) Do authoritarian institutions constrain? How legislatures affect economic growth and investment. American Journal of Political Science 52(2), 322–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Rasmussen and Knutsen Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/EDHLIN
Link
Supplementary material: File

Rasmussen and Knutsen supplementary material

Online Appendices

Download Rasmussen and Knutsen supplementary material(File)
File 298.1 KB