Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T03:57:26.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Estimation of body fat in normal and obese mice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2008

P. Rogers  and
G. P. Webb
P. Rogers
Affiliation:
Department of Paramedical Sciences, North East London Polytechnic, Romford Road, London E15 4LZ
G. P. Webb
Affiliation:
Department of Paramedical Sciences, North East London Polytechnic, Romford Road, London E15 4LZ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Lee Index (weight (g0.33)÷ nasoanal length (mm)), density, body water and proportional weight of the gonadal fat pad were tested as estimates of body fat in a normal population of mice and a population which included obese mice.

2. In a normal population only body water and fat-pad weight correlated significantly with body fat.

3. In a population of normal and obese mice all four indices correlated significantly with body fat.

4. Lee Index had little advantage over weight: length as an estimate of body fat, and density did not correlate well enough to be used as a method of estimation.

5. Proportional weight of the gonadal fat pad is recommended as a simple reliable estimate of body fat in normal or obese mice.

Type
Papers on direct relevance to Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 83 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1980

References

REFERENCES

Bernardis, L. & Patterson, B. (1968). J. Endocr. 40, 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, G. & York, D. (1971). Physiol. Rev. 51, 598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brecher, J. & Waxler, S. (1949). Proc. Soc. exp. Biol. Med. 70, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunyan, J.. Murrel, E. & Shah, P. (1976). Br. J. Nutr. 35, 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, S., Passmore, R., Brock, J. & Truswell, A. (1975). Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 6th ed.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Kanarek, R. & Hirsch, E. (1977). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 36, 154.Google Scholar
Larsson, S. (1967). Acta Physiol. scand. Suppl. 294, 42.Google Scholar
Lee, M. O. (1928). Am. J. Physiol. 89, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, P., Webb, G. & Jagot, S. (1979). I.R.C.S. Med. Sci. 7, 402.Google Scholar
Rutman, R., Lewis, F. & Bloomer, W. (1966). Science, N.Y. 153, 1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Pirquet, C. P. (1917). System der Ernahrung, vol. 1 Berlin: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, G. & Rogers, P. (1979). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 38, 75A.Google Scholar