Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-4n89n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T22:04:02.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Support and Adjustments for Neurodiverse Students Referred to Greater Manchester Universities Student Mental Health Service

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Emmalene Fish
Affiliation:
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Timothy Alnuamaani
Affiliation:
Greater Manchester Mental Health, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Simon Postlethwaite
Affiliation:
Greater Manchester Mental Health, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Are neurodiverse university students, referred to Greater Manchester University Student Mental Health Service (GMUSMHS), receiving the Disability and advisory support services (DASS) input they are entitled to? If not, are GMUSMHS recognising this and signposting appropriately?

Methods: In the interest of improving equality and diversity, along with access to higher education, services to support the increasing numbers of neurodiverse students are available. GMUSMHS uses a needs-led approach, across the 5 Greater Manchester universities. It can also ensure those struggling with complex mental health needs, alongside neurodivergence, can be signposted to appropriate educational support/adjustments. Enabling them to thrive and reach their academic potential.

16 referrals mentioning Neurodiversity within the designated 3-month period were identified. Initial referral forms, GMUSMHS assessment notes and outcomes were reviewed for DASS input. There were no exclusion criteria.

Results: From our sample 69% had a working diagnosis of Autistic spectrum condition (ASC). In all cases, where the diagnosis was not confirmed, the student was offered screening or onward referral for diagnosis. Six of the students were not noted to be under DASS and were not documented to have been signposted. All students who engaged with GMUSMHS were offered an intervention, this included extended assessment, case management, formulation sessions, Connecting people, emotion regulation/compassion focused therapy group, and PTSD/trauma education group.

Conclusion: Neurodivergent students may not be accessing the educational support and adaptations they are entitled to. GMUSMHS are supporting referrals for diagnosis of neurodiversity. They are not, however, consistently documenting if these students are accessing, or have been referred to DASS. Raising awareness and improving a collaborative approach between GMUSMHS and DASS is required. Including prompts on referral forms and assessment proformas may be helpful. A neurodivergent service lead has been allocated and service development to improve access for this client group has begun.

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.