No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 June 2025
Aims: Assess the number of patients discharged from General Adult Psychiatry wards with hypnotics prescribed for insomnia.
Evaluate the consistency of documenting discontinuation plans for hypnotics in discharge summaries.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 24-hour discharge summaries for patients discharged from six adult inpatient general psychiatry wards between 15/01/2024 and 15/04/2024. The review focused on patients prescribed regular hypnotics for insomnia, specifically analysing the “Instructions to GP” section to determine whether a specific discontinuation plan was recommended or advised. This was done by reviewing our online database used within the trust.
Results: In the current audit, 56.25% of the sample had discharge summaries that included a medication review for hypnotics suggested to the GP, while only 18.75% included a specific discontinuation plan for hypnotic medication. A previous audit conducted in 2023 on two adult inpatient general psychiatry wards demonstrated 0% compliance, with no discharge summaries containing a medication review for hypnotics or a specific discontinuation plan. Following the implementation of changes, a re-audit in 2024 on the same wards showed significant improvement, with 66.6% of discharge summaries including a medication review for hypnotics and 33.3% containing a specific discontinuation plan for hypnotic medication.
Conclusion: The previous recommendations have led to noticeable improvements; however, strict adherence to these recommendations is necessary to achieve the target of 100% compliance. It is crucial for the inpatient General Adult Psychiatry team to consistently communicate a specific discontinuation plan for hypnotics to the GP. This practice is essential to reduce the risk of dependence and minimize potential side effects associated with hypnotic medications.
Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.