Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-tzd6m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-26T19:17:06.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Prospective Audit Investigating How the Anticholinergic Effect of Medications on Cognition Is Assessed and Reduced in Patients Admitted to an Older Adult Ward in a Psychiatric Hospital

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Dinushi Marambe
Affiliation:
Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom
Prami Rai
Affiliation:
Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust, Canterbury, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Older adults often have multiple comorbidities associated with an increased risk of anticholinergic effects. Mental health medications increase this risk, contributing to cognitive decline, dementia, memory loss and confusion. Evidence suggests stopping these medications can reduce cognitive deterioration and progression of dementia. MediChec is an online tool that calculates an Anticholinergic Effect on Cognition (AEC) score. An AEC score above 2 and a total AEC score above 3 require a medication review for potential adjustment or deprescribing. This audit aims to determine whether the AEC scores were recorded at admission, during admission, and at discharge. Additionally, it assesses if further actions were taken to deprescribe unsuitable anticholinergics, resulting in a lower AEC score before discharge.

Methods: Data was collected using RIO (clinical system) and eMeds (prescribing system) for inpatients admitted to the older adult ward, from 1 August 2024 to 9 November 2024. Patients’ past and current medications, including their AEC scores documented in the Notes section, were reviewed on eMeds. RIO notes were used to determine whether side effects were reconsidered during ward reviews with the medical team.

Results: 24 inpatients were identified with AEC score assessments documented for 22 inpatients. 22.7% (n=5) of these assessments were performed within the first 7 days of admission. The AEC scores recorded were documented solely by the lead pharmacist.

Antidepressant use was noted in 45.5% (n=10) of those 22 patients. Among these, 90% (n=9) were prescribed medication with an AEC score of 1, while the remaining had a score of 2. Similarly, 50% (n=11) of the patients were on antipsychotic medication. On the AEC score assessment, 27% (n=3) of these medications scored 1, 64% (n=7) scored 2, and 9% (n=1) scored 3.

For the above patients whose AEC scores indicated a review, 0 patients went on to receive a documented medication review and follow-up AEC score.

Conclusion: Increasing awareness and understanding of the anticholinergic effect on cognition can help provide better patient care. This can be achieved by sending a poster about the importance of reviewing medication for higher AEC scores to the pharmacy team and the ward doctors. Likewise, implementing the AEC score in the ward-round template and recording any changes to the medication on RIO and eMeds. By utilising the AEC score to guide medication reviews and deprescribing regimes, the cognitive burden of anticholinergic medications may be significantly reduced and ultimately promote improved outcomes.

Information

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.