Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-pf7kn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T19:49:47.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Managing Medical Emergencies in Psychiatry: An Induction for Foundation Doctors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

John Harvey
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, United Kingdom
La-Dantai Henriques
Affiliation:
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, United Kingdom
Muniswamy Hemavathi
Affiliation:
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Luton, United Kingdom
Sen Kallumpuram
Affiliation:
East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Inpatient mental health wards present an environment in which rotating foundation doctors often have little prior exposure; with the average length of psychiatry placements in the undergraduate curriculum spanning just six and a half weeks, out of a median of 85 weeks for all clinical placements. The environment of mental health wards differs significantly from the acute hospital environment, with different staffing roles, equipment, and escalation procedures. This project aimed to assess the knowledge and confidence of existing foundation doctors in managing medical emergencies on the ward and develop an induction teaching programme for new trainees to further equip them in managing these presentations. Topics including the nature and challenges of the clinical environment, familiarisation of the emergency kit, patient population-specific conditions and escalation procedures were included in the session.

Methods: Teaching focussed on each of the highlighted topics was delivered to new foundation trainees during their induction. This included two facilitated desktop simulation scenarios around the recognition, investigation and initial management of opioid overdose and neuroleptic malignant syndrome and subsequent debrief and facilitated reflection. Pre- and post- questionnaires were completed using 5-point Likert scales (0–strongly disagree – 5–strongly agree) allowing participants to self-assess their knowledge and confidence across a range of domains including familiarity with emergency kit, limitations of providing emergency medical care in mental health wards, and awareness of escalation procedures and referral documentation.

Results: This session was run with a total of 11 participants, as part of their induction programme to the trust. Improvement in Likert score was seen across all domains with an average improvement from 1.57/5 to 4.66/5. Analysis of written feedback for the session demonstrated that participants found the interactive case scenarios to be interactive and engaging, with all participants finding the session useful and appropriate to their level of clinical training.

Conclusion: Feedback from this session indicated that it is well received by all participants and demonstrated improvement in self-perceived knowledge and confidence across all domains assessed. Using a blend of traditional direct teaching alongside facilitated discussions and interactive scenarios was effective in facilitating engagement across the session as demonstrated in session feedback and through the use of live audience polling during the session. This session will continue to be featured as part of the induction of new foundation doctors to support them in their preparation for caring for patients in mental health wards.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.