Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-x9fsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T20:25:51.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lithium Monitoring in Adult Community Mental Health Patients: Evaluating Current Practices in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Mouza AlDhaheri
Affiliation:
Behavioral Sciences Institute, Al Ain Hospital, Al Ain, UAE
Salma AlAzeezi
Affiliation:
Behavioral Sciences Institute, Al Ain Hospital, Al Ain, UAE
Fatima AlShanqiti
Affiliation:
Behavioral Sciences Institute, Al Ain Hospital, Al Ain, UAE
Taibah AlMadhaani
Affiliation:
Behavioral Sciences Institute, Al Ain Hospital, Al Ain, UAE Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
Syed Fahad Javaid
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Lithium is a well-established mood stabiliser used for conditions such as bipolar disorder, mania, and depression. Given its narrow therapeutic index, regular monitoring is essential to prevent toxicity, which can cause confusion, seizures, coma, or death. This audit evaluated long-term lithium monitoring compliance for adult community-based patients at the Behavioural Science Institute, Al Ain Hospital, United Arab Emirates. We assessed adherence to local hospital guidelines, which align with The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Guideline CG185, recommending six-monthly checks of serum lithium levels, thyroid function, renal function, calcium levels, and BMI, with some patient groups requiring more frequent testing notably older adults, those taking medications interacting with lithium, and patients at risk of kidney, thyroid, or electrolyte abnormalities.

Methods: This retrospective audit reviewed electronic case notes of 38 patients on long-term lithium therapy under community mental health services from January 2018 to January 2019. A questionnaire was developed to capture the necessary information anonymously. Data collection occurred between March and May 2024.

Results: Of the 38 patients, 20 (53%) were male, with an age range of 20–64 years and a mean age of 35.2 years. The most common diagnosis was bipolar disorder, which accounted for 44.7% of cases, followed by schizoaffective disorder at 18.4% and major depressive disorder at 10.5%. Regarding six-monthly monitoring, serum lithium levels were measured in 25 patients (65.8%), with documented reasons provided for only six of the 13 patients who did not undergo testing. BMI was monitored in 36 patients (94.7%), while thyroid function tests were conducted for 31 patients (81.5%). Renal function was assessed in 27 patients (71%), with urea and electrolytes checked in 32 patients (84.2%). Notably, serum calcium levels were measured in only three patients (7.8%), highlighting a significant gap in monitoring adherence.

Conclusion: The audit revealed considerable inconsistencies in lithium monitoring, particularly in the assessment of serum lithium and calcium levels. To address these gaps, we recommend enhancing staff training on lithium prescribing and monitoring protocols to ensure adherence to guidelines. Optimising electronic prescribing systems to generate automated reminders may improve compliance, while better documentation practices are needed to ensure that any deviations from standard monitoring are appropriately justified. A re-audit will be conducted one year after implementing these measures to evaluate their effectiveness.

No financial sponsorship has been received for this evaluative exercise.

Information

Type
Service Evaluation
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.