Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-7mr9c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-24T15:46:53.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating PRN Medication Prescribing Practices in Mental Health Services: A Comparative Audit Following a Serious Incident

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Nidhi Shashidhar
Affiliation:
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Olayinka Adegboye
Affiliation:
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: PRN (pro re nata) medications are widely used in mental health settings but are prone to misuse and prescribing errors. A serious incident involving a patient’s death linked to excessive PRN medication supply prompted an initial audit to evaluate compliance with prescribing standards. A re-audit was conducted to assess progress and identify ongoing challenges.

Methods: Two prospective audits were conducted across an inpatient acute ward and a rehabilitation centre. The initial audit (29/07/2024–06/08/2024) and re-audit (29/01/2025–06/02/2025) reviewed medication cards, Rio (electronic patient notes) and EPMA (Electronic Prescribing and Medicines Administration) for 31 patients prescribed PRN medications. Compliance was assessed against 13 predefined standards, including generic naming, dose intervals, BNF compliance, and regular reviews.

Results: Sustained Full Compliance:

Both audits demonstrated 100% compliance in key areas: generic naming, specified administration routes, separate prescriptions for multiple routes, adherence to BNF limits, clear indications for use, and rewriting altered prescriptions.

Key Improvements:

Minimum dose interval specification improved from 64.5% to 93.5%.

Maximum dose documentation increased from 96.7% to 100%.

Regular ward round reviews rose dramatically from 3.2% to 64.5%.

Discontinuation of unused PRN medications (>1 month) improved from 0% to 22.2%.

Review of PRN medications used regularly (>72 hours) increased from 0% to 28.5%.

Documentation of regular vs. PRN use improved from 33.3% to 44.4%.

Ongoing challenges:

Review of PRN medications used regularly (>72 hours) remained low at 28.5%.

Discontinuation of unused PRN medications (>1 month) was only 22.2%.

Documentation of regular vs. PRN use remained below 50%.

Conclusion: The re-audit demonstrates significant progress in dose interval specification, maximum dose documentation, and ward round reviews. However, challenges persist in the regular review and discontinuation of PRN medications, as well as in documenting regular vs. PRN use. Continued focus on these areas is essential to ensure patient safety and adherence to best prescribing practices.

Recommendations:

Key recommendations include integrating PRN standards into doctor inductions, involving pharmacists in ward rounds, and conducting regular re-audits to monitor progress and sustain improvements. Disseminating guidelines and providing feedback to medical teams are essential steps toward achieving full compliance and enhancing patient safety.

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.