Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-kfd97 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-24T15:56:14.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Suicide and Homicide on Clinicians

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Christiana Elisha-Aboh
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley Foundation Trust, York, United Kingdom
Hany El-Sayeh
Affiliation:
Tees, Esk and Wear Valley Foundation Trust, North Allerton, United Kingdom.
Rachel Gibbons
Affiliation:
Independent Researcher, London, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: The effects on professionals following the death of a patient by suicide can be phenomenal and life changing. The Royal College of Psychiatrists has developed guidelines to promote operational strategies and adequate pastoral care for professionals affected by patient suicides. Recognizing the profound impact on mental health, burnout, retention and career progression, these guidelines aim to foster a supportive culture. Enhanced support could facilitate genuine reflection and learning from such incidents, ultimately leading to improved patient care.

The aim was to discuss the impact of suicides and homicides on clinicians while exploring available support structures and understanding relevant psychological processes.

Methods: On October 25, 2024, a one-hour medical webinar hosted 87 participants, including doctors, medical students, and nursing staff. Led by Dr Rachel Gibbons, an experienced consultant psychiatrist, the session focused on clinician vulnerabilities and defensive mechanisms. Pre- and post-workshop surveys evaluated areas of interest and effectiveness for future planning.

Results: The pre-survey results revealed that 34% of respondents were primarily interested in the potential blame associated with incidents, while 16% sought guidance on supporting colleagues. Notably, 65% had experienced a Serious Untoward Incident (SUI), predominantly suicides and homicides (92%), with many professionals expressing self-blame and feelings of failure. They struggled to support affected families and felt the review process often emphasized blame rather than learning.

In the post-survey, 77% of responders reported involvement in an SUI, with 88% linked to suicides or homicides. Support perceptions varied: 36% felt supported by fellow doctors, and 20% by their trust, while colleagues (52%) and family and friends (56%) were highlighted as key sources of support. Most learned about incidents through emails, phone calls, or word of mouth (64%), and only 40% were satisfied with how they were informed. Respondents emphasized the importance of sensitive communication and individualized support plans in enhancing their experiences.

Conclusion: Overall feedback was overwhelmingly positive, with 93% of attendees expressing interest in future events. An impressive 97% found the seminar very or extremely helpful, while 93% wanted webinars on supporting clinicians, bereaved families, and attending coroner’s court. Many reported significant emotional impacts from suicides, affecting performance in 41% and prompting 27% to consider leaving psychiatry. Attendees emphasized the need for better support systems, compassionate communication, and debriefs to alleviate blame culture and improve coping with immediate effects.

Upcoming webinars will utilise feedback, ensure wider participation, engage senior management, and raise awareness of pastoral support strategies.

Information

Type
Quality Improvement
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.