Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-mqssf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-25T14:11:29.289Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cultivating Confident Care: Implementation of a Bitesize Teaching Approach on a Crisis Assessment Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Andrew Hayward
Affiliation:
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
James Selbie
Affiliation:
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
Laura Shaw
Affiliation:
Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Leeds, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: Following a transformation in the acute care pathway within Leeds and York Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, a six-bed inpatient unit was established to support service users experiencing complex mental health crises requiring an in-depth assessment period of up to 72 hours. This service redesign highlighted a need for multidisciplinary staff to enhance their confidence in formally assessing a service user’s mental state within this timeframe and managing common medical issues, including those associated with the initiation of psychotropic medication.

To address this, we implemented a structured programme of regular ‘bitesize’ teaching sessions. The primary objective was to improve staff competence in these key areas, while a secondary aim was to embed regular teaching into the workplace culture, fostering continuous professional development within the multidisciplinary team.

Methods: A poster was developed to raise awareness of the teaching programme and gather staff input on topic selection. Nine structured 15-minute teaching sessions were delivered by various members of the multidisciplinary team and strategically integrated into regular board round meetings to optimise attendance.

To evaluate the impact of these sessions, attendees were asked to subjectively rate their confidence levels before and after each session using a five-point Likert scale. Additionally, an objective knowledge assessment was conducted, and qualitative feedback was collected. Pre- and post-session Likert scale data were compared and analysed for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Results: A total of 71 staff members participated in the nine sessions, with further sessions planned as part of the ongoing programme. Attendees included doctors, nurses, occupational therapists, health support workers and healthcare students, demonstrating broad multidisciplinary engagement.

Both verbal and written feedback were overwhelmingly positive, with recurring themes highlighting the sessions as engaging, accessible, and informative. Across all teaching topics, improvements in both knowledge and confidence levels were consistently observed, with the latter achieving statistical significance. However, challenges in ensuring the regular delivery of sessions were noted, particularly in relation to staff availability due to workload pressures and securing presenters.

Conclusion: The findings suggest that the ‘bitesize’ teaching model is an effective and well-received approach to enhancing staff confidence and knowledge in mental state assessment and the management of common medical conditions. The sessions continue to run, and to further support learning, a compendium of educational resources is being compiled for future reference and accessibility.

Type
Education and Training
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.