Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-2jdt9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-23T16:18:50.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessment and Management of Substance Misuse Among Patients With Psychosis at a Mental Health Inpatient Unit in CNTW NHS Foundation Trust: An Audit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Mithun Pulichumakal Devasia
Affiliation:
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Gary Martin
Affiliation:
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Pooja Thakrar
Affiliation:
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Rana Shahzaib
Affiliation:
Belfast Heath and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom
Adebayo Erinfolami
Affiliation:
Cumbria Northumberland Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Aims: The audit aims to check compliance with regards to assessment and management of substance misuse among patients admitted with psychosis in male wards, St George’s Park hospital. The following National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) guideline was considered for the audit: Coexisting Severe Mental Illness (Psychosis) and Substance Misuse: Assessment and Management in Healthcare Settings – CG 120 (published on March 23, 2011).

Methods: All patients with diagnosis of psychosis and any comorbid substance use history admitted as inpatients in the wards from a period of July 1 to July 31 2024 were considered for the audit. Only patients who were on the wards for a minimum duration of 7 days were included.

A total of 37 patients were found as suitable. Patient progress notes and discharge letters were reviewed to check compliance with standards.

Results: Our results showed areas of both good compliance and poor compliance with regards to the standard. We found that 88.8% of patients were assessed for comorbid substance use during the first week of admission by the treatment team. In 62.06% of patients, there was evidence of involvement for specialist drug and alcohol services on admission and in the management of withdrawal symptoms. For 87.5% of patients, it was evident that policies were followed with regards to search procedures, visiting arrangements, planning and reviewing leaves, regular drug and alcohol testing and other security measures. However, only 42.8% compliance was noted regarding involvement with specialist substance use services on discharge.

Conclusion: The audit has demonstrated that wards showed good compliance to NICE guidelines around assessment of substance use and in following policies regarding measures to check for substance use in ward settings. However lower compliance was evident with regards to involvement of specialist substance misuse services during both admission and discharge. Following the outcome of audit and presentation in local team meetings, it was decided to initiate a service evaluation to look at barriers regarding involvement of specialist drug and alcohol services along with an educational programme for professionals especially nursing staff regarding the need of screening and referral for people with comorbid substance use in psychosis. A re-audit is planned after a period of 6 months.

Information

Type
Audit
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

Footnotes

Abstracts were reviewed by the RCPsych Academic Faculty rather than by the standard BJPsych Open peer review process and should not be quoted as peer-reviewed by BJPsych Open in any subsequent publication.

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.