Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T02:36:19.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do people in the “Land of Hornbills” perceive Hornbills?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

PENGIRAN PHILOVENNY Open the ORCID record for PENGIRAN PHILOVENNY [Opens in a new window]  and
JAYASILAN MOHD-AZLAN Open the ORCID record for JAYASILAN MOHD-AZLAN [Opens in a new window]
PENGIRAN PHILOVENNY*
Affiliation:
UNIMAS, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia.
JAYASILAN MOHD-AZLAN
Affiliation:
UNIMAS, Kota Samarahan, 94300, Sarawak, Malaysia.
*
*Author for correspondence; email: philovennypengiran26@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Sarawak is known as the “Land of Hornbills”, having the Rhinoceros Hornbill as the state emblem and with hornbills also being closely associated with important cultural symbols and beliefs among various local communities. However, up to date there is limited understanding on the perception, awareness, and beliefs of local communities towards hornbills. This paper aims to describe the aforementioned factors in western Sarawak, in hope of acquiring the socio-cultural information needed to fill the gap, and to clarify misconceptions towards hornbill conservation efforts in Sarawak. Data collection was accomplished using Open Data Kit (ODK). A total of 500 respondents were approached in five administrative divisions in western Sarawak, namely Kuching, Samarahan, Serian, Sri Aman, and Betong. The questionnaire was carefully formulated to control acquiescence bias that might arise. Boosted Regression Tree (BRT) modelling was conducted to evaluate the strongest demographic predictor variables influencing the answers and word clouds were used to visualise hornbill species by the local community. Sarawakians acknowledge the importance of hornbills as a cultural symbol (95%) despite hornbills being used for food, medicine, and decoration. Whilst this study describes the perceptions of hornbills in local communities, a comprehensive assessment throughout Sarawak is recommended for better understanding of hornbill importance in other communities. Such socio-cultural information is vital to ensure the success of conservation efforts and for effective management strategies of hornbills within Sarawak.

Keywords

Hornbillsperception surveyconservationwestern SarawakBoosted Regression Tree Modelling
Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 33 , 2023 , e5
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of BirdLife International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abram, N. K., Meijaard, E., Wells, J. A, Ancrenaz, M., Pellier, A. S., Runting, R. K., Gaveau, D., Wich, S., Nardiyono, Tiju A., Nurcahyo, A. and Mengersen, K. (2015) Mapping perceptions of species’ threats and population trends to inform conservation efforts: the Bornean orangutan case study. Divers. Distrib. 21: 487– 499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, V. L. and Ripot, S. (2017) From pre-Brookes to hot, flat, and crowded world: are changes in indigenous knowledge, beliefs and practices seriously affecting hornbills conservation? Pp. 1–14 in Importance of hornbill: 7th International Hornbill Conference 2017 , 16-18 May. Kuching, Sarawak, East Malaysia.Google Scholar
Ancrenaz, M., Dabek, L. and O’Neil, S. (2007) The costs of exclusion: recognizing a role for local communities in biodiversity conservation. PLoS Biol. 5: e289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Azad, M.A.J.A.G. (2012) biodiversity conservation strategy in Malaysia: a review from an Islamic perspective (Strategi Pemuliharaan Biodiversiti di Malaysia: Satu Pandangan dari Sudut Islam). Jurnal Hadhari: An International Journal. 4: 129–136.Google Scholar
Beastall, C., Shepherd, C. R., Hadiprakarsa, Y. and Martyr, D. (2016) Trade in the Helmeted Hornbill Rhinoplax vigil: the ‘ivory hornbill’. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 26: 137–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, E. L., Nyaoi, A. J. and Sompud, J. (1997) Hornbills Buceros spp. and culture in northern Borneo: Can they continue to co-exist? Biol Conserv. 82: 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billiet, J. B. and Davidov, E. (2008) Testing the stability of an acquiescence style factor behind two interrelated substantive variables in a panel design. Sociol. Meth. Res. 36: 542–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, C. (2006) Translating data into meaning: education in conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 20: 689–691.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clements, R., Foo, R., Syahaneem, Othman, Rahman, U., Ruqaiyah, S., Mustafa, S. and Zulkifli, R. (2009) Islam, turtle conservation, and coastal communities. Conserv. Biol. 23: 516–517.Google ScholarPubMed
Collar, N. J. (2015) Helmeted Hornbills Rhinoplax vigil and the ivory trade: the crisis that came out of nowhere. Birding Asia. 24: 12–17.Google Scholar
Crandall, S. G., Ohayon, J. L., de Wit, L. A., Hammond, J. E., Melanson, K. L., Moritsch, M. M., Davenport, R., Ruiz, D., Keitt, B., Holmes, N. D. and Packard, H. G. (2018) Best practices: social research methods to inform biological conservation. Australas. J. Environ. Manage. 25: 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datta, A. (2007) Hunting for hornbills: approaches to conservation in Arunachal Pradesh, north-east India. P. 41 in Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I., eds. Proceedings the Fourth International Hornbill Workshop. The active management of hornbills and their habitats for conservation. Pretoria: Naturalists & Nomads.Google Scholar
Derwent, S. and Mander, M. (1997) Twitchers bewitched. The use of birds in traditional healing. Africa: Birds & Birding 2: 22–25.Google Scholar
Dhar, U., Rawal, R. S., Airi, S., Bhatt, I. D. and Samant, S. S. (2002) Promoting outreach through conservation education programmes. Case study from Indian Himalayan Region. Curr. Sci. 82: 808–815.Google Scholar
Di Minin, E., Tenkanen, H. and Toivonen, T. (2015) Prospects and challenges for social media data in conservation science. Front. Environ. Sci. 3: 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elands, B. H. M. and Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2007) Indicators for the ’Convention on biodiversity 2010’. Public awareness and participation. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wettelijke Onderzoekstaken Natuur & Milieu. (Work Doc No. 53.12).Google Scholar
Elith, J., Leathwick, J. R. and Hastie, T. (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J. Anim. Ecol. 77: 802–813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Engelbrecht, D., Theron, N., Turner, A., Van Wyk, J. and Pienaar, K. (2007) The status and conservation of Southern Ground Hornbills, Bucorvus leadbeateri, in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Pp. 252–256 in Kemp, A. C. and Kemp, M. I., eds. Proceedings the Fourth International Hornbill Workshop. The active management of hornbills and their habitats for conservation. Pretoria: Naturalists & Nomads.Google Scholar
Environmental Investigation Agency (2015) Sin City: illegal wildlife trade in Laos’ Golden Triangle Special Economic Zone. Available at: https://eia-international.org/wp-content/uploads/EIA-Sin-City-FINAL-med-res.pdf Google Scholar
Feinerer, I. and Hornik, K. (2018) tm: Text Mining Package. R package version 0.7-5. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm.Google Scholar
Fellows, I. (2018) wordcloud: Word Clouds. R package version 2.6. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=wordcloud.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. J. (1993) Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. J. Consumer Res. 20: 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FitzGibbon, S.I. and Jones, D. N. (2006) A community-based wildlife survey: the knowledge and attitudes of residents of suburban Brisbane, with a focus on bandicoots. Wildl. Res. 33: 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, G. A. and Thongaree, S. (2006) Density estimates of nine hornbill species in a l owland forest site in southern Thailand. Bird Conserv. Internatn. 16: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez, J. C. T. (2011) Enumerating the ethno-ornithological importance of Philippine hornbills. Raffles Bull. Zool. 24: 149–161.Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J., Philips, S., Leathwick, J. and Elith, J. (2017) dismo: Species distribution modeling. R package version 1.1-4. Https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dismo.Google Scholar
Kala, C.P. (2017) Conservation of nature and natural resources through spirituality. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 5: 24–34.Google Scholar
Kemp, A. C. (1995) The hornbills: Order Bucerotiformes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press,Google Scholar
Kitamura, S. (2011) Frugivory and seed dispersal by hornbills (Bucerotidae) in tropical forests. Acta Oecol. 37: 531–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, E. and Palmer, M. (2015) Why conservation needs religion. Coastal Manage. 43: 238–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijaard, E., Sheil, D., Nasi, R., Augeri, D., Rosenbaum, B., Iskandar, D., Setyawati, T., Lammertink, A., Rachmatika, I., Wong, A., Soehartono, T., Stanley, S. and O’Brien, T. (2005) Life after logging: reconciling wildlife conservation and production forestry in Indonesian Borneo. Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Meijaard, E., Mengersen, K., Buchori, D., Nurcahyo, A., Ancrenaz, M., Wich, S., Atmoko, S.S., Tjiu, A., Prasetyo, D., Hadiprakarsa, Y. and Christy, L. (2011a) Why don’t we ask? A complementary method for assessing the status of great apes. PLoS One 6: e18008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meijaard, E., Buchori, D., Hadiprakarsa, Y., Utami-Atmoko, S. S., Nurcahyo, A., Tjiu, A., Prasetyo, D., Christie, L., Ancrenaz, M., Abadi, F. and Antoni, I. N. (2011b) Quantifying killing of orangutans and human-orangutan conflict in Kalimantan, Indonesia. PLoS One. 6: e27491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misni, A., Rasam, A.R.A., and Buyadi, S. N. A. (2017) Spatial analysis of habitat conservation for hornbills: A case study of Royal Belum-Temengor forest complex in Perak State Park, Malaysia. Pertanika J. Soc. Sci. Human. 25: 11–20.Google Scholar
Mohd-Azlan, J. and Lawes, M. J. (2012) The efficacy of protected areas and future challenges for wildlife. Conservation in Sarawak. Pp. 136–146 in Mokhtar, M. and Halim, S. A., eds. RIMBA2: Regional Sustainable Development in Malaysia and Australia. Bangi: Lestari Publisher.Google Scholar
Mohd-Azlan, J., Belant, J. L. and Meijaard, E. (2013) Can secondary information inform about population trends of carnivores in Borneo? Raffles Bull. Zool. Supp. 28: 1–8.Google Scholar
Naniwadekar, R., Shukla, U., Isvaran, K. and Datta, A. (2015) Reduced hornbill abundance associated with low seed arrival and altered recruitment in a hunted and logged tropical forest. PLoS One 10: e0120062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Data Kit (2018) Open Data Kit Documentation. Getting Started With ODK, Release 1.0. Available at: https://docs.opendatakit.org/getting-started/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, E. C. M., Shiffman, D. S., Darling, E. S., Spillman, N. and Wright, A. J. (2014) How twitter literacy can benefit conservation scientists. Conserv. Biol. 28: 299–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. and Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88: 879.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rangkong Indonesia (2018) About rangkongID and social media account links. Available at: https://rangkong.org/en/about-us Google Scholar
Ridgeway, G. (2017) gbm: Generalized Boosted Regression Models. R package version 2.1.3. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gbm .Google Scholar
White, P. C., Jennings, N. V., Renwick, A. R. and Barker, N. H. (2005) Questionnaires in ecology: a review of past use and recommendations for best practice. J. Appl. Ecol. 42: 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Younis, E. M. G. (2015) Sentiment analysis and text mining for social media microblogs using Open Source tools: An empirical study. Internatn. J. Computer Applic. 112: 44–48.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Philovenny and Mohd-Azlan supplementary material

Philovenny and Mohd-Azlan supplementary material

Download Philovenny and Mohd-Azlan supplementary material(File)
File 2 MB