Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-xnzsz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-21T18:00:08.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What can artificial languages reveal about morphosyntactic processing in bilinguals?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2019

Sarah Grey Open the ORCID record for Sarah Grey [Opens in a new window]
Sarah Grey*
Affiliation:
Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Fordham University
*
Address for correspondence: Sarah Grey, E-mail: sgrey4@fordham.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article reviews work that has employed artificial languages to investigate the learning and processing of additional language grammar in bilinguals, with a focus on morphosyntactic processing in sentence contexts. The article first discusses research that has utilized artificial languages to elucidate two central issues in research on bilingual third language learning and processing: the role of prior language-learning experience and cross-linguistic transfer from the native and second languages to the third. Then, research that has compared bilingual third language to monolingual second language grammar processing is discussed, with specific consideration of hypothesized bilingual advantages at language learning. Finally, future directions in artificial language learning research on bilingual morphosyntactic processing are considered.

Keywords

morphosyntaxthird languagelanguage learningartificial language
Type
Review Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 81 - 86
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alonso, JG and Rothman, J (2017) Coming of age in L3 initial stages transfer models: Deriving developmental predictions and looking towards the future. International Journal of Bilingualism 21, 683–697.Google Scholar
Amato, MS and MacDonald, MC (2010) Sentence processing in an artificial language: Learning and using combinatorial constraints. Cognition 116, 143–148.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.001Google Scholar
Antoniou, M, Liang, E, Ettlinger, M and Wong, PCM (2015) The bilingual advantage in phonetic learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 683–695.10.1017/S1366728914000777Google Scholar
Bardel, C and Falk, Y (2012) The L2 status factor and the declarative/procedural distinction. In Cabrelli, J, Amaro, S, Flynn, S and Rothman, J (Ed.), Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Batterink, L and Neville, H (2013) Implicit and explicit second language training recruit common neural mechanisms for syntactic processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 25, 936–951.Google Scholar
Berkes, É and Flynn, S (2012) Further evidence in support of the Cumulative-Enhancement Model. In Cabrelli, J, Amaro, S, Flynn, S and Rothman, J (eds), Third language acquisition in adulthood. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E (2015) Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child development perspectives 9, 117–121.Google Scholar
Blanco-Elorrieta, E and Pylkkänen, L (2018) Ecological validity in bilingualism research and the bilingual advantage. Trends in cognitive sciences 22, 1117–1126.Google Scholar
Bowden, HW, Steinhauer, K, Sanz, C and Ullman, MT (2013) Native-like brain processing of syntax can be attained by university foreign language learners. Neuropsychologia 51, 2492–2511.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J (2013) The influence of bilingualism on third language acquisition: Focus on multilingualism. Language Teaching 46, 71–86.10.1017/S0261444811000218Google Scholar
Cenoz, J and Valencia, J (1994) Additive trilingualism: Evidence from Basque Country. Applied Psycholinguistics 15, 197–209.Google Scholar
Cox, JG (2017) Explicit instruction, bilingualism, and the older adult learner. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39, 29–58.Google Scholar
Dillon, AM (2009) Metalinguistic awareness and evidence of cross-linguistic influence among bilingual learners in Irish primary schools. Language Awareness 18, 182–197.10.1080/09658410902928479Google Scholar
Escudero, P, Mulak, KE, Fu, CSL and Singh, L (2016) More limitations to monolingualism: bilinguals outperform monolinguals in implicit word learning. Frontiers in psychology 7, 1218.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, M, Morgan-Short, K, Faretta-Stutenberg, M, and Wong, P C (2016) The relationship between artificial and second language learning. Cognitive Science 40, 822–847.Google Scholar
Ferman, S and Karni, A (2010) No childhood advantage in the acquisition of skill in using an artificial language rule. PloS one 5, e13648.10.1371/journal.pone.0013648Google Scholar
Flynn, S, Foley, C and Vinnitskaya, I (2004) The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults' and children's patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism 1, 3–16.Google Scholar
Friederici, AD, Steinhauer, K and Pfeifer, E (2002) Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 529–534.10.1073/pnas.012611199Google Scholar
Folia, V, Uddén, J, De Vries, M, Forkstam, C and Petersson, KM (2010) Artificial language learning in adults and children. Language learning 60, 188–220.Google Scholar
Grey, S, Sanz, C, Morgan-Short, K and Ullman, MT (2018) Bilingual and monolingual adults learning an additional language: ERPs reveal differences in syntactic processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 970–994.Google Scholar
Grey, S, and Tagarelli, KM (2018) Psycholinguistic methods. In Phakiti, A, d. Costa, P, Plonsky, L and Starfield, S (eds), Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. UK: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 287–312.Google Scholar
Grey, S, Williams, JN and Rebuschat, P (2014) Incidental exposure and L3 learning of morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36, 611–645.Google Scholar
Jessner, U (2008) Teaching third languages: Findings, trends, and challenges. Language Teaching 41, 15–56.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M (2012) Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 470–489.Google Scholar
Kempe, V, Kirk, NW and Brooks, PJ (2015) Revisiting theoretical and causal explanations for the bilingual advantage in executive functioning. Cortex 73.10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.021Google Scholar
Lado, B, Bowden, HW, Stafford, C and Sanz, C (2017) Two birds, one stone, or how learning a foreign language makes you a better language learner. Hispania 100, 361–378.10.1353/hpn.2017.0064Google Scholar
Lehtonen, M, Soveri, A, Laine, A, Järvenpää, J, de Bruin, A and Antfolk, J (2018) Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 144, 394–425.10.1037/bul0000142Google Scholar
Marian, V, and Shook, A (2012) The cognitive benefits of being bilingual. Paper presented at the Cerebrum: the Dana forum on brain science.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K (2014) Electrophysiological approaches to understanding second language acquisition: A field reaching its potential. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 34, 15–36.Google Scholar
Morgan-Short, K, Sanz, C, Steinhauer, K and Ullman, MT (2010) Second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: An event-related potential study. Language Learning 60, 154–193.Google Scholar
Nation, R and McLaughlin, B (1986) Novices and Experts: An Information Processing Approach to the “Good Language Learner” Problem. Applied Psycholinguistics 7, 41–55.Google Scholar
Nayak, N, Hansen, N, Krueger, N and McLaughlin, B (1990) Language-learning strategies in monolingual and multilingual adults. Language Learning 40, 221–244.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L and Holcomb, PJ (1992) Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of memory and language 31, 785–806.Google Scholar
Paap, KR, Anders-Jefferson, R, Mason, L, Alvarado, K and Zimiga, B (2018) Bilingual advantages in inhibition or selective attention: More challenges. Frontiers in psychology 9.Google Scholar
Pili-Moss, D (2017) Tracking the early stages of child and adult comprehension of L2 morphosyntax: A pilot study. Journal of the European Second Language Association 1, 113–125.10.22599/jesla.25Google Scholar
Poepsel, TJ and Weiss, DJ (2016) The influence of bilingualism on statistical word learning. Cognition 152, 9–19.Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P and Williams, JN (2012) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 33, 829–856.10.1017/S0142716411000580Google Scholar
Rothman, J (2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research 27, 107–127.Google Scholar
Rothman, J (2015) Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 179–190.Google Scholar
Rothman, J, Alemán Bañón, J and González Alonso, J (2015) Neurolinguistic measures of typological effects in multilingual transfer: Introducing an ERP methodology. Frontiers in psychology 6, 1087.Google Scholar
Sanz, C, Park, HI and Lado, B (2015) A functional approach to cross-linguistic influence in ab initio L3 acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 236–251.Google Scholar
Slabakova, R (2017) The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism 21, 651–665.Google Scholar
Stafford, CA, Bowden, HW and Sanz, C (2012) Optimizing language instruction: Matters of explicitness, practice, and cue learning. Language Learning 62, 741–768.Google Scholar
Stafford, CA, Sanz, C and Bowden, HW (2010) An experimental study of early L3 development: Age, bilingualism and classroom exposure. International Journal of Multilingualism 7, 162–183.Google Scholar
Van Hell, JG and Tokowicz, N (2010) Event-related brain potentials and second language learning: Syntactic processing in late L2 learners at different L2 proficiency levels. Second Language Research 26, 43–74.Google Scholar
Williams, JN and Kuribara, C (2008) Comparing a nativist and emergentist approach to the initial stage of SLA An investigatin of Japanese scrambling. Lingua 118, 522–553.Google Scholar