Skip to main content Accessibility help

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.

Cited by
  • Crossref logo 18
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Novitskiy, N.Y. 2016. Features of brain functioning in bilinguals while performing speech and general cognitive tasks. Journal of Modern Foreign Psychology, Vol. 5, Issue. 4, p. 77.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Hoversten, Liv J. Brothers, Trevor Swaab, Tamara Y. and Traxler, Matthew J. 2017. Early processing of orthographic language membership information in bilingual visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 103, Issue. , p. 183.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Hoversten, Liv J. and Traxler, Matthew J. 2020. Zooming in on zooming out: Partial selectivity and dynamic tuning of bilingual language control during reading. Cognition, Vol. 195, Issue. , p. 104118.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

R. Heredia, Roberto and B. Cieślicka, Anna 2020. Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. p. 3.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Whitford, Veronica and Guedea, Erika L. 2020. Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. p. 231.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Palma, Pauline and Titone, Debra 2020. Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. p. 159.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Assche, Eva van Brysbaert, Marc and Duyck, Wouter 2020. Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. p. 42.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Friesen, Deanna C. Whitford, Veronica Titone, Debra and Jared, Debra 2020. The impact of individual differences on cross-language activation of meaning by phonology. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 323.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

García, Omar Cieślicka, Anna B. and Heredia, Roberto R. 2020. Bilingual Lexical Ambiguity Resolution. p. 184.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Jankowiak, Katarzyna 2021. Current trends in electrophysiological research on bilingual language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 15, Issue. 8,
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Brothers, Trevor Hoversten, Liv J and Traxler, Matthew J 2021. Bilinguals on the garden-path: Individual differences in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 612.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

de León Rodríguez, D. Mouthon, M. Annoni, J.-M. and Khateb, A. 2022. Current exposure to a second language modulates bilingual visual word recognition: An EEG study. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 164, Issue. , p. 108109.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Arana, Sophie L. Oliveira, Helena M. Fernandes, Ana Isabel Soares, Ana Paula and Comesaña, Montserrat 2022. The cognate facilitation effect depends on the presence of identical cognates. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 660.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Bultena, Sybrine and Dijkstra, Ton 2023. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. p. 1.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Quiñonez-Beltran, Juan Francisco Seymour, Taylor Marissa Robbins, Robert A. J. Xu, Ying and Joshi, R. Malatesha 2024. What Can Eye Movements Tell Us about Reading in a Second Language: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Education Sciences, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 375.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Xue, Jinyi Chien, Yu-Fu and Xu, Kunyu 2025. Reading Chinese but with Korean in mind: ERP evidence for nonselective lexical access in sentence reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 28, Issue. 3, p. 638.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Parshina, Olga Smirnova, Anna Goldina, Sofya and Bainbridge, Emily 2025. The effect of the global language context on bilingual language control during L1 reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 577.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Tarin, Karla Hernández-Rivera, Esteban Iniesta, Antonio Palma, Pauline Whitford, Veronica and Titone, Debra 2025. When sentence meaning biases another language: an eye-tracking investigation of cross-language activation during second language reading. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, p. 1.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Quick Links

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Aspire

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2025

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements*
  • Volume 19, Issue 2
  • LIV J. HOVERSTEN (a1) and MATTHEW J. TRAXLER (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000115
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements*
  • Volume 19, Issue 2
  • LIV J. HOVERSTEN (a1) and MATTHEW J. TRAXLER (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000115
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

A time course analysis of interlingual homograph processing: Evidence from eye movements*
  • Volume 19, Issue 2
  • LIV J. HOVERSTEN (a1) and MATTHEW J. TRAXLER (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000115
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.

You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.