Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-k8lnt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-30T04:46:21.687Z Has data issue: true hasContentIssue false

The roles of intolerance of uncertainty, anxiety sensitivity and distress tolerance in hoarding disorder compared with OCD and healthy controls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2022

Shemariah R. Hillman*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Claire L. Lomax
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Nadeen Khaleel
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK
Theresa R. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath, UK
James D. Gregory
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, UK School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email: shem.hillman@bath.edu

Abstract

Background:

It is suggested that the different psychological vulnerability factors of intolerance of uncertainty (IU), anxiety sensitivity (AS) and distress tolerance (DT) may be in important in hoarding disorder (HD). However, the extent to which these factors are specific to HD compared with other disorders remains unclear.

Aims:

The current study aimed to investigate differences in IU, AS and DT in three groups: HD (n=66), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD; n=59) and healthy controls (HCs; n=63).

Method:

Participants completed an online battery of standardised self-report measures to establish the independent variable of group membership (HD, OCD and HC) and the dependent variables (IU, AS and DT).

Results:

A MANOVA analysis indicated statistically significant differences in IU, AS and DT between the clinical groups and HCs. Follow-up analyses showed no statistically significant differences between the HD and OCD group for any of the three constructs. The results remained the same when examining the effects of co-morbid HD and OCD. An unexpected finding was the trend for IU, AS and DT to be more severe when HD and OCD were co-morbid.

Conclusions:

The evidence suggests the absence of a specific relationship between IU, AS or DT in HD and instead is consistent with existing research which suggests that these psychological vulnerability factors are transdiagnostic constructs across anxiety disorders. The implications of the findings are discussed.

Information

Type
Main
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.