Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-28T19:19:27.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What we (don't) know about what we know

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2014

Shlomi Sher  and
Piotr Winkielman
Shlomi Sher
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Pomona College, Claremont, CA 91711 Shlomi.Sher@pomona.edu
Piotr Winkielman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0109 pwinkielman@ucsd.edu http://psy2.ucsd.edu/~pwinkiel/ University of Social Sciences and Humanities, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The hypothesis of unconscious influences on complex behavior is observationally equivalent to the dissociability of cognition and metacognition (reportability). The target article convincingly argues that evidence for unconscious influence is limited by the quality of the metacognitive measure used. However, it understates the empirical evidence for unconscious influences and overlooks considerations of cognitive architecture that make cognitive/metacognitive dissociations likely.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 38 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baars, B. J. (2005) Global workspace theory of consciousness: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience. Progress in Brain Research 150:45–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kouider, S. & Dehaene, S. (2007) Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362(1481):857–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D. & Simonsohn, U. (2011) False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant Psychological Science 22:1359–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, D. J., Hannula, D. E., Warren, D. E. & Day, S. W. (2007) Behavioral, neuroimaging and neuropsychological approaches to implicit perception. In: Cambridge handbook of consciousness, ed. Zelazo, P. D., Moscovitch, M., & Thompson, E., pp. 207–50. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Squire, L. R. (1992) Declarative and nondeclarative memory: Multiple brain systems supporting learning and memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4:232–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkielman, P. & Schooler, J. W. (2011) Splitting consciousness: Unconscious, conscious, and metaconscious processes in social cognition. European Review of Social Psychology 22: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar