Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T22:23:38.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Understanding action with the motor system

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 April 2014

Vittorio Gallese  and
Corrado Sinigaglia
Vittorio Gallese
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy. vittorio.gallese@unipr.ithttp://www.unipr.it/arpa/mirror/english/staff/gallese.htm
Corrado Sinigaglia
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, University of Milan, 20121 Milan, Italy. corrado.sinigaglia@unimi.ithttp://dipartimento.filosofia.unimi.it/index.php/corrado-sinigaglia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We challenge Cook et al.'s claim about the vagueness of the notion of action understanding in relation with mirror neurons. We show the multidimensional nature of action understanding and provide a definition of motor-based action understanding, shedding new light on the various components of action understanding and on their relationship. Finally, we propose an alternative perspective on the origin of mirror neurons, stressing the necessity to abandon the dichotomy between genetic and associative hypotheses.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 199 - 200
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butterfill, S. A. & Sinigaglia, C. (2014) Intention and motor representation in purposive action. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88(1):119–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2012.00604.Google Scholar
Cannon, E. N. & Woodward, A. L. (2012) Infants generate goal-based action predictions. Developmental Science 15:292–98. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01127.x.Google Scholar
de Lange, F. P., Spronk, M., Willems, R. M., Toni, I. & Bekkering, H. (2008) Complementary systems for understanding action intentions. Current Biology 18(6):454–57.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2000) The inner sense of action: Agency and motor representations. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7:23–40.Google Scholar
Gallese, V., Rochat, M., Cossu, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2009) Motor cognition and its role in the phylogeny and ontogeny of intentional understanding. Developmental Psychology 45(1):103–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V. & Sinigaglia, C. (2011) What is so special about embodied simulation? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15(11):512–19.Google Scholar
Kanakogi, Y. & Itakura, S. (2011) Developmental correspondence between action prediction and motor ability in early infancy. Nature Communications 2:341. doi:10.1038/ncomms1342.Google Scholar
Liepelt, R., von Cramon, D. Y. & Brass, M. (2008a) How do we infer other's goals from nonstereotypic actions? The outcome of context-sensitive inferential processing in right inferior parietal and posterior temporal cortex. Neuroimage 43:784–92.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Sinigaglia, C. (2010) The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(4):264–74. doi: 10.1038/nrn2805.Google Scholar
Vanderwert, R. E., Fox, N. A. & Ferrari, P. F. (2013) The mirror mechanism and mu rhythm in social development. Neuroscience Letters Apr 12:540:15–20.Google Scholar
Van Overwalle, F. (2009) Social cognition and the brain. A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 30:829–58.Google Scholar