Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-d5hhr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-03T09:58:36.065Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seeing attention in inattentional blindness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Steven B. Most Open the ORCID record for Steven B. Most [Opens in a new window]
Steven B. Most*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia s.most@unsw.edu.au https://www.unsw.edu.au/staff/steven-most
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rosenholtz is right that the multiple meanings of attention hinder development of a unified attention theory, but this is not a crisis. Embracing its diversity can advance fields like clinical psychology. However, inattentional blindness challenges attempts to move beyond attention as an explanatory concept. I illustrate this by highlighting attentional set, which demonstrates selective prioritization rather than mere task constraints.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e152
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bar-Haim, Y. (2010). Attention bias modification (ABM): A novel treatment for anxiety disorders. Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 51(8), 859–870. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02251.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, M. M., Golomb, J. D., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual review of psychology, 62, 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100427 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Gelder, B., Tamietto, M., van Boxtel, G., Goebel, R., Sahraie, A., van den Stock, J., Stienen, B. M., Weiskrantz, L., & Pegna, A. (2008). Intact navigation skills after bilateral loss of striate cortex. Current biology : CB, 18(24), R1128–R1129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.11.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in neurosciences, 15(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(92)90344-8 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Koivisto, M., & Revonsuo, A. (2007). How meaning shapes seeing. Psychological Science, 18(10), 845–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01989.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, C., Grafton, B., & Notebaert, L. (2019). Anxiety-linked attentional bias: Is it reliable?. Annual review of clinical psychology, 15, 529–554. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095505 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Most, S. B. (2013). Setting sights higher: Category-level attentional set modulates sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological research, 77(2), 139–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0379-7 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Most, S. B., & Astur, R. S. (2007). Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents. Visual Cognition, 15(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280600959316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R., & Simons, D. J. (2005). What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review, 112(1), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.217 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E., & Chabris, C. F. (2001). How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological science, 12(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onie, S., & Most, S. B. (2017). Two roads diverged: Distinct mechanisms of attentional bias differentially predict negative affect and persistent negative thought. Emotion, 17(5), 884–894. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000280 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onie, S., & Most, S. B. (2022). On the relative sensitivity of spatial and nonspatial measures of attentional bias: Emotion-induced blindness, the dot probe, and gradations in ratings of negative pictures. Emotion, 22(8), 1942–1951. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000855 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, F., Naumann, E., Trentowska, M., & Svaldi, J. (2014). Attentional bias for food cues in binge eating disorder. Appetite, 80, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.023 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059–1074. https://doi.org/10.1068/p281059 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., & Koster, E. H. (2014). A review of current evidence for the causal impact of attentional bias on fear and anxiety. Psychological bulletin, 140(3), 682–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034834 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, R. C., & Davies, A. A. (2008). Attention set for number: Expectation and perceptual load in inattentional blindness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(5), 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1092 Google ScholarPubMed