Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-nr592 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-24T08:32:24.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of embodied change in perceiving and processing facial expressions of others

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2010

Pablo Briñol ,
Kenneth G. DeMarree  and
K. Rachelle Smith
Pablo Briñol
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain. pablo.brinnol@uam.es http://www.uam.es/otros/persuasion/
Kenneth G. DeMarree
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409. ken.demarree@ttu.edu rachelle.smith@ttu.edu http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/kdemarre/
K. Rachelle Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409. ken.demarree@ttu.edu rachelle.smith@ttu.edu http://webpages.acs.ttu.edu/kdemarre/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The embodied simulation of smiles involves motor activity that often changes the perceivers' own emotional experience (e.g., smiling can make us feel happy). Although Niedenthal et al. mention this possibility, the psychological processes by which embodiment changes emotions and their consequences for processing other emotions are not discussed in the target article's review. We argue that understanding the processes initiated by embodiment is important for a complete understanding of the effects of embodiment on emotion perception.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 6 , December 2010 , pp. 437 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Briñol, P. & DeMarree, K. G., eds. (in press) Social metacognition. Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E (2003) Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 84:1123–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E. (2008) Embodied persuasion: Fundamental processes by which bodily responses can impact attitudes. In: Embodiment grounding: Social cognitive, affective and neuroscientific approaches, ed. Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R., pp. 184–207. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briñol, P., Petty, R. E. & Wagner, B. C. (2009) Body postures effects on self-evaluation: A self-validation approach. European Journal of Social Psychology 39:1053–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartrand, T. L. & Bargh, J. A. (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMarree, K. G., Briñol, P., Petty, R. E. & Smith, K. R. (2010) Facial validation through metacognitive processes. Unpublished manuscript, Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Briñol, P. & Tormala, Z. L. (2002) Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82:722–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19:123–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. R., DeMarree, K. G., Briñol, P. & Petty, R. E. (2010) Mimicry: A self-validation analysis. Unpublished manuscript, Texas Tech University.Google Scholar