No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 April 2025
We embrace Moffett's call for more rigorous definitions of social organizations but raise two intersecting critiques: (1) The spaces controlled by societies are not exclusively physical, and (2) cooperation is required to maintain control over spaces, physical or otherwise. We discuss examples of non-physical societal spaces across species and highlight the top-down group cooperation challenge that is maintaining them.
Target article
What is a society? Building an interdisciplinary perspective and why that's important
Related commentaries (16)
A nation by any other name: A failure to focus on function
Definitions and cultural dynamics in understanding “societies”
Do boundaries matter so much for societies?
How an interdisciplinary study of societies can develop a comprehensive understanding of the function of deceptive behavior
Identity groups, perceived group continuity, and schism
Identity is probably too complicated to serve as a useful criterion for defining society
Psychological mechanisms for individual recognition- and anonymous-societies in humans and other animals
Societies have functions for individuals and collectives
Societies of the open ocean without territories
Societies, identities, and macrodemes
Society: An anthropological perspective
The family as the primary social group
Understanding the jaggedness in social complexity is more important
Vocalizations are ideal identity signals
What is a society in the case of multilevel societies?
Why societies are important and grow so large: Tribes, nations, and teams