Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-kl2l2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-22T16:18:00.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Getting beyond the “convenience sample” in research on early cognitive development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Anne Fernald
Anne Fernald
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. afernald@stanford.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on the early development of fundamental cognitive and language capacities has focused almost exclusively on infants from middle-class families, excluding children living in poverty who may experience less cognitive stimulation in the first years of life. Ignoring such differences limits our ability to discover the potentially powerful contributions of environmental support to the ontogeny of cognitive and language abilities.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 2-3 , June 2010 , pp. 91 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arnett, J. (2008) The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist 63(7):602–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coe, C. L. & Lubach, G. R. (2008) Fetal programming: Prenatal origins of health and illness. Current Directions in Psychology 17:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A. & Marchman, V. A. (2006) Learning language in infancy. In: Handbook of psycholinguistics, 2nd edition, ed. Gernsbacher, M. & Traxler, M., pp. 1027–71. Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernald, A., Perfors, A. & Marchman, V. (2006) Picking up speed in understanding: Speech processing efficiency and vocabulary growth across the second year. Developmental Psychology 42:98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, G. (2007) Probabilistic epigenesis. Developmental Science 10:1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoff, E. (2003) The specificity of environmental influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development 74:1368–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2007) Spoken word recognition by Latino children learning Spanish as their first language. Journal of Child Language 33:27–249.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Marchman, V. A. & Fernald, A. (2008) Does input influence uptake? Links between maternal talk, processing speed and vocabulary size in Spanish-learning children. Developmental Science 11:F31–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, S. C., Vasilyeva, M., Lourenco, S. F., Newcombe, N. S. & Huttenlocher, J. (2005) Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science 16(11):841–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milner, E. (1951) A study of the relationship between reading readiness in grade-one children and patterns of parent-child interaction. Child Development 22:95–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. Harper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramey, C. T. & Ramey, S. L. (2004) Early learning and school readiness: Can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 50:471–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. S. & Kinzler, K. D. (2007) Core knowledge. Developmental Science 10:89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wight, V. R., Chau, M. & Aratani, Y. (2010) Who are America's poor children? The official story. National Center for Children in Poverty: Columbia University.Google Scholar
Zhang, T. Y. & Meaney, M. J. (2010) Epigenetics and the environmental regulation of the genome. Annual Review of Psychology 61:439–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed