Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-ksgrx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-03T09:58:23.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attention is still a productive framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Tianye Ma ,
Inik Kim ,
Sahereh Varastegan ,
Li Yang ,
Jessica Golding  and
Weiwei Zhang Open the ORCID record for Weiwei Zhang [Opens in a new window]
Tianye Ma
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , CA, US mack.ma@email.ucr.edu inik.kim@email.ucr.edu svara010@ucr.edu lyang147@ucr.edu jgold065@ucr.edu Weiwei.zhang@ucr.edu
Inik Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , CA, US mack.ma@email.ucr.edu inik.kim@email.ucr.edu svara010@ucr.edu lyang147@ucr.edu jgold065@ucr.edu Weiwei.zhang@ucr.edu
Sahereh Varastegan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , CA, US mack.ma@email.ucr.edu inik.kim@email.ucr.edu svara010@ucr.edu lyang147@ucr.edu jgold065@ucr.edu Weiwei.zhang@ucr.edu
Li Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , CA, US mack.ma@email.ucr.edu inik.kim@email.ucr.edu svara010@ucr.edu lyang147@ucr.edu jgold065@ucr.edu Weiwei.zhang@ucr.edu
Jessica Golding
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , CA, US mack.ma@email.ucr.edu inik.kim@email.ucr.edu svara010@ucr.edu lyang147@ucr.edu jgold065@ucr.edu Weiwei.zhang@ucr.edu
Weiwei Zhang*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Riverside , CA, US mack.ma@email.ucr.edu inik.kim@email.ucr.edu svara010@ucr.edu lyang147@ucr.edu jgold065@ucr.edu Weiwei.zhang@ucr.edu
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The debate on attention’s validity in cognitive psychology persists. However, attention remains essential beyond peripheral vision constraints, as it is a resource-limited process (Norman & Bobrow, 1975). The outright dismissal of attention proposed in the target article risks conceptual voids without superior alternatives. Instead, refining attention as a theoretical framework offers a pragmatic path for advancing cognitive research.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e148
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Anderson, B. (2011). There is no such thing as attention. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, B. (2023). Stop paying attention to “attention.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 14(1), e1574.Google ScholarPubMed
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 109.Google ScholarPubMed
Eberhardt, L. V., Strauch, C., Hartmann, T. S., & Huckauf, A. (2022). Increasing pupil size is associated with improved detection performance in the periphery. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84(1), 138–149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillyard, S. A., & Anllo-Vento, L. (1998). Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(3), 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommel, B., Chapman, C. S., Cisek, P., Neyedli, H. F., Song, J.-H., & Welsh, T. N. (2019). No one knows what attention is. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 2288–2303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, M. J., Bleckley, M. K., Conway, A. R., & Engle, R. W. (2001). A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2), 169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavie, N., & De Fockert, J. W. (2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65(2), 202–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luck, S. J., & Vecera, S. P. (2002). Attention. Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 1, 235–286.Google Scholar
Luck, S. J., Vogel, E. K., & Shapiro, K. L. (1996). Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature, 383(6601), 616–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Bobrow, D. G. (1975). On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology, 7(1), 44–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberauer, K., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Lewandowsky, S. (2016). What limits working memory capacity? Psychological Bulletin, 142(7), 758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, S. E. (1978). Fundamental aspects of cognitive representation. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 259–303). Routledge.Google Scholar
Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012). The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 35(1), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849.Google Scholar
Shalev, L., Tsal, Y., & Mevorach, C. (2007). Computerized progressive attentional training (CPAT) program: Effective direct intervention for children with ADHD. Child Neuropsychology, 13(4), 382–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soydaner, D. (2022). Attention mechanism in neural networks: Where it comes and where it goes. Neural Computing and Applications, 34(16), 13371–13385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vilotijević, A., & Mathôt, S. (2024). Functional benefits of cognitively driven pupil-size changes. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 15(3), e1672.Google ScholarPubMed
Wu, W. (2024). We know what attention is! Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(4), 304–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xie, W., & Zhang, W. (2023). Effortfulness of visual working memory: Gauged by physical exertion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152(7), 2074.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453(7192), 233–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, W., & Luck, S. J. (2009). Feature-based attention modulates feedforward visual processing. Nature Neuroscience, 12(1), 24–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed