Hostname: page-component-857557d7f7-8wkb5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-12-03T09:58:29.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attention and visual search: No crisis here

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2025

Jeremy M. M. Wolfe Open the ORCID record for Jeremy M. M. Wolfe [Opens in a new window]
Jeremy M. M. Wolfe*
Affiliation:
Visual Attention Lab, Department of Surgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA jwolfe@bwh.harvard.edu https://search.bwh.harvard.edu/new/index.html
*
*Corresponding author.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rosenholtz’s paper is a solid addition to a long tradition of throwing out babies with attentional bathwater (Di Lollo, 2012) (Wolfe, 2012) (Hulleman & Olivers, 2017) (Wolfe, 2017). She is correct that the term “attention” has been used in profligate and often ill-defined ways. That said, I argue that any plausible model of visual search must include visual selective attention.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 48 , 2025 , e159
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Di Lollo, V. (2012). The feature- binding problem is an ill-posed problem Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(6), 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulleman, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2017). The impending demise of the item in visual search. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, e132. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X15002794 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, R. M. (2009). On the control of attention Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 240–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, A., Wolfe, J. M., & Hulleman, J. (2024). Errors in visual search: Are they stochastic or deterministic? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 9, 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-024-00543-z Google ScholarPubMed
Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, J. M. (2012). The binding problem lives on: Comment on Di Lollo. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(6), 307–308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, J. M. (2017). “I am not dead yet!” – The item responds to Hulleman and Olivers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 48–e161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X16000303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Kosovicheva, A., & Wolfe, B. A. (2022). Normal blindness: When we look but fail to see. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26, 809–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.006 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolfe, J. M., Vo, M. L.-H., Evans, K. K., & Greene, M. R. (2011). Visual search in scenes involves selective and non-selective pathways. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J. M., Wu, C. C., Li, J., & Suresh, S. B. (2021). What do experts look at and what do experts find when reading mammograms? Journal of Medical Imaging (Bellingham), 8(4), 045501. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.Jmi.8.4.045501 Google Scholar
Wu, C. C., & Wolfe, J. M. (2022). The Functional Visual Field(s) in simple visual search. Vision Research, 190, 107965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2021.107965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar