Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Windschitl, Paul D.
and
Wells, Gary L.
1996.
Base rates do not constrain nonprobability judgments.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
40.
Stalker, Douglas
1996.
Where do you stand on the base rate issue?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
38.
Margolis, Howard
1996.
Nuancing should not imply neglecting.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
32.
Krueger, Joachim
1996.
Studying the use of base rates: Normal science or shifting paradigm?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
30.
Dawes, Robyn M.
1996.
The purpose of experiments: Ecological validity versus comparing hypotheses.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Koonce, Lisa
1996.
Base rates in the applied domain of accounting.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
McLeod, Peter J.
and
Watt, Margo
1996.
How are base rates used? Interactive and group effects.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
35.
Gigerenzer, Gerd
1996.
Why do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work on information, which needs representation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
23.
Koehler, Jonathan J.
1996.
Issues for the next generation of base rate research.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Edgell, Stephen E.
Roe, Robert M.
and
Dodd, Clayton H.
1996.
Base rates, experience, and the big picture.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
21.
McKenzie, Craig R. M.
and
Soll, Jack B.
1996.
Which reference class is evoked?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
34.
Vicente, Kim J.
1996.
The perils of reconstructive remembering and the value of representative design.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
40.
Hamm, Robert M.
1996.
Physicians neglect base rates, and it matters.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
25.
Fernandez-Berrocal, Pablo
Almaraz, Julian
and
Segura, Susana
1996.
How to reconsider the base rate fallacy without forgetting the concept of systematic processing.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
21.
Connolly, Terry
1996.
Are base rates a natural category of information?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
19.
Klar, Yechiel
1996.
P(D/H), P(D/˜H), and base rate consideration.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
26.
Melone, Nancy Paule
and
McGuire, Timothy W.
1996.
Conservatism revisited: Base rates, prior probabilities, and averaging strategies.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
36.
Koehler, Jonathan J.
1996.
The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
1.
Anderson, Norman H.
1996.
Cognitive algebra versus representativeness heuristic.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Ginzburg, Lev R.
Janson, Charles
and
Ferson, Scott
1996.
Judgment under uncertainty: Evolution may not favor a probabilistic calculus.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
24.