Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-23T04:09:47.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The multiple adaptive problems solved by human aggression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

David M. Buss
David M. Buss
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, A8000, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712. dbuss@psy.utexas.eduwww.davidbuss.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human psychology contains adaptations to deploy aggression as one solution to many distinct adaptive problems. These include expropriating resources, defending against incursions, establishing encroachment-deterring reputations, inflicting costs on rivals, ascending dominance hierarchies, dissuading partner defection, eliminating fitness-draining offspring, and obtaining new mates. Aggression is not a singular strategy. Comprehensive theories must identify the “design features” of multiple adaptations for aggression.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 271 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Buss, D. M. (1988b) The evolution of human intrasexual competition: Tactics of mate attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:616–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buss, D. M. (2005) The murderer next door: Why the mind is designed to kill. The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Dedden, L. (1990) Derogation of competitors. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 7:395–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Duntley, J. D. (2006) The evolution of aggression. In: Evolution and social psychology, ed. Schaller, M., Kenrick, D. T. & Simpson, J. A., pp. 263–86. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Duntley, J. D. (2008) Adaptations for exploitation. Group Dynamics 12:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, D. M. & Shackelford, T. K. (1997b) Human aggression in evolutionary psychological perspective. Clinical Psychology Review 17:605–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, A. (1995) A few good men: Evolutionary psychology and female adolescent aggression. Ethology and Sociobiology 16:99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. (2002) A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. (1983) Yanomamo: The fierce people, 3rd edition.Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Chagnon, N. A. (1988) Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239:985–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Duntley, J. D. & Shackelford, T. K., eds. (2008) Evolutionary forensic psychology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grauer, A. L. & Stuart-Macadam, P., eds. (1998) Sex and gender in paleopathological perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitt, D. P. & Buss, D. M. (1996) Mate attraction and competitor derogation: Context effects on perceived effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70:1185–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, D. L. (2007) The most dangerous animal. St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1988) The evolution of war and its cognitive foundations. Institute for Evolutionary Studies, Technical Report No. 88-1.Google Scholar
van der Dennen, J. M. G. (1995) The origin of war. Rigin.Google Scholar
Zerjal, T., Xue, Y., Bertorelle, G., Wells, R. S., Bao, W., Zhu, S., Qamar, R., Ayub, Q., Mohyuddin, A., Fu, S., Li, P., Yuldasheva, N., Ruzibakiev, R., Xu, J., Shu, Q., Du, R., Yang, H., Hurles, M. E., Robinson, E., Gerelsaikhan, T., Dashnyam, B., Mehdi, S. Q. & Tyler-Smith, C. (2003) The genetic legacy of the Mongols. American Journal of Human Genetics 72:717–21. [Published electronically January 17. Available at:http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract&artid=1180246.]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed